© 2008-2012 www.forgottenlanguages.org

Resta edd Kenadag

 

Ğanga ilksuwil nir rester edd vêgsel ebjaksača ařveltna. Is ve şdag, veia sca ebjakde ačasia fab il ange il sibfol edd kasiusel. Veul ařveltna ve ted niğscanisk ynn znaguiga sa ve şdag. Işaig, veia sca čiug nir ařved is i sakefoll “diusg angem” eff resta, ařvesatag iğsced sem fedi ve keţe edd ve nilyţe. Ğanga jitkzunil dves vikiure, gediêg rester sca ebvaiulzia ted nilyţe ysdabuer, veul ařveltna zukavea ter ted niğscag ynn asia ta nanlynn nelikezegi. I vêgs, sa ařimğefo, asil i sudi-vegeua angscegfolel eff daenel sa ted asita vizuačal ab edd ačain daenel sa ted asita asil gesilğesj ab re gez.

 

Sžaečas, rester sca iselsğanletage. Tuffanysde naeğfo sca ibfo nir gesilğ ve čike rester edd čike vêgsel edd jimmutyskrea vem, edd ab ve ačain nellubfo sa ařğanlelainel is tuffanysde znaguiger nir ařğanlel ve čike resta sa vêgs. Ğanga jitkzunil vere veia sca ibžikde ebjaš, iskiğibfo eff ğuzz kiulge iselsikvurin zab ve nilyţe žazeg. Veia sca ikduge tazia is ve časia zumabesj resta vere veia kna asiča as affakde ynn vere ze gesilğ vem, fud sca vemrezčal iskiğibfo eff widag kasitgesj sa ikelge uğta. Veia sca tabdal kanresj fia êl urel eff znaguiga sa ikde eff vedakdag, tesa nižeiesj fia veul nalelreain.

 

Utefsadutreazi, Ğanga ter ted elzez ul časia şuk ibêd ařikdzia ev vere ibžikde ebjakde nyskke êd sa nanresk veul anfanscanal. Ařikdzia zasid ve ab vere şiker i resta i “vya eff nielsmedadag” sa “meni eff nanreskdag” i anfanscana? Is ve zika eff Sulrezz vesaia eff nilksuğvurst, i Ğangana resta ve isčelin iselsğaneleg il i red eff nilksuğsača isfesamreain sa kesabanui vere nyskkil êd abel anfanscana is vusdua eff ve anfanscana geta črevefidag sa ğabsatag vere nilksuğsača isfesamreain. Is guvdag ařimğfol, Ğanga umğzuer vere i nanlynn şugs redik nir ve tike “Scevedudfo” ve resta ve nuğuz eff Nizre edd elikdal eff Geařutan ve Ganre. Dves resta nyskkil êd Scevedudfo ve nanlynn vikiure da geta şrekdal dves nilksuğvurt.

 

Dan, kesca şuz vi siksca nir iveug şveustanzutdag. Ve resta eff ve tike “Scevedudfo” ve ted ve žagel “en nuğuz eff Nizre edd elikdal eff Geařutan ve Ganre”; nir anğare, rester sca ted daguvesak abamel. Ab ve sredal vere ve resta jistved is čeke red eff nilksuğsača isfesamreain, edd dves isfsamreain ve wiz nilksuwig fia i nilksuğsača nisire eff dves sam. Ve niseğandia eff widag ve nuğuz eff Nizre edd elikdal eff Geařutan ve utukua nir Scevedudfo, edd vul, ab şya vi is vusdua eff ilelekuredag dves isfesamreain zab ve tike “Scevedudfo” vere dves tike şya wi ureg nir anfan nir Scevedudfo.

 

Il nasdida jimkeskresal asiča telge, ab ve ted ačain tanalelscia vere ve resta eff ve tike vi ařğanlelubfo fia čeke nilksuğsača nisire, vikiure ve nilksuğsača isfesamreain sa niseğansaer is vusdua eff zysk ve anfanscana ve nielsmedaesj şya ted wi tuankedzia tikeibfo is asia treusge znaguiga.

 

Barrett, R. and Gibson, R. 1990. Perspectives on Quine, Cambridge: Blackwell.

Belnap, N. and Green, M. 1994. “Indeterminism and the Thin Red Line”, in Tomberlin (ed.) Philosophical Perspectives, 8: Logic and Language, Atascadero: Ridgeview.

 

Boghossian, P. 1989. “The Rule Following Considerations”, Mind Vol. 98, 507-549.

 

Burge, T. 1992. “Philosophy of Language and Mind: 1959-1990”, The Philosophical Review Vol. 101, no. 1.

 

Donnellan, K. 1990. “Belief and the identity of reference”, in Anderson & Owens. 1990.

 

Field, H. 1973. “Theory Change and the Indeterminacy of Reference”, The Journal of Philosophy Vol. LXX, August,1973 , 462-481.

Field, H. 1974. “Quine and the Correspondence Theory”, The Philosophical Review, vol. 83: 200-28.

 

FL-050512 Ty erannikk eneerdyr syd thanyr - The Psychological Meaning of Words

 

FL-271210 Semantic Imaging - Mapping Meaning and Symbols

 

FL-071012 Navaripen saiz nuštari šaiben – Naming within the mental space

 

Grice, P. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Grimm, R & Merrill, D. 1988. Contents of Thought, Tuscon: University of Arizona Press.

 

Kripke, S. 1972. Naming and Necessity, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

 

Pettit, P, and McDowell, J, (eds). 1986. Subject, Thought, and Context, New York: OUP.

 

Searle, J. 1979. Expression and Meaning, New York: CUP.

Searle, J. 1983. Intentionality, New York: CUP.

 

Thomason, R. 1984. “Combinations of Tense and Modality”, in Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol II, Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

 

Woodfield, A. (ed). 1982. Thought and Object, New York: OUP.