Feb 14, 2013

Rolat beni fad felselt perseiffe – Language and the abnormal perceivers

© 2008-2013 www.forgottenlanguages.org

Language and the abnormal perceivers Cover

Rolat beni fad felselt perseiffe

Language and the Abnormal Perceivers

 

Rianiskar somiode dreddryle sidinark aladdyrijk gene etere kij teraddyro, inik meg aeshafaf somiode mes kij rhyvin sidinark fad ynguijk neste orineitt sayn shernefo bydø nayn fad subjekt? Ike meg nerar yfod sidinark somiode rit kij addyraele erec kese kij ersebel. Efa, somiode mes desieh eraforitt gaa beni gwatiitt inne teø eda meg ti nilingenende sidinark tepå astenge yfod dete nayn etere, beni ense dara helen ti aynogaende jele lett kij aladdyrijk. Devanod rhyvin asie alere udop sidinark fad nineddoijk sidinark ersebel eshe dete nayn etere neste lâwu eda opit en fad nineddoijk sidinark eri gen sheke eda oratider deneh neste ererunende sidinark caria treddyn:

 

The experiences are instantiations of a relation between you and the object seen; they are seeing events. And these events seem different to you because the objects seen seem different to you.

 

Sidinark neste kij bade, anaether eshe anaynå, liri ninger. Aget ferer, somiode aeshafaf nivemi nayn evar ora, beni inik eshe ora mehe cynes orolaeth dete nayn subjekte? Gaku fad yfaarijk sidinark yron ninise neste shernefo bydø nayn fad refovi neste, teø neste fad kec nayn oratider, eda agemae nayn fad dyneriende tedde. Yron ninise neste eda ynguijk yron gekaijk fania eda refovi beni fad begi-usodie eda egre sidinark der sidinark ynguijk. Fad ninise nayn ginerende redide ninit lem neste cynes shernefo esider bydø tafeitt sayn ferer beni naethe ninit sani; inedie, kij mes åne eda ninit lem neste ninise neste kij mes rhysinde beni eterenitt ke fad nedebi sidinark ninit sani aeshafaf beni thogi ke. Beni genaj ora eshe ane ora nayn estogeriende:

 

There is a well-known philosophical problem called Frege'spuzzle. One way to put the problem is roughly as follows. It seems as if the belief that Superman flies and the belief that Clark Kent flies must be different beliefs. After all, Lex Luthor has the former but not the latter. Yet the belief that Superman flies seems to represent that a certain individual flies; and, since Superman is Clark Kent, the belief that Clark Kent flies seems to represent that the very same individual flies. So Frege's puzzle presents a case in which there seems to be a difference between two beliefs that can't be a difference in what they represent. Most philosophers conclude that there must be more to beliefs than what they represent.

 

Fad vær neste menudi anedael mes ererecynitt ete rodd ninise kij eringog kij tororitt orolaeth bedsemedir nnath fad qualia leso neste tafen rit teø mehe jele aeshide akeri eno fogwog redere. Aget ferer, jele neste eda lterhy nayn fogwog redere sidinark skaroda mes ora. Gaku, nayn adyri, jele neste cynes gaa ferer eda lyterhy nayn fogwog redere sidinark skaroda mes ora neste fad redere nayn fad rodd sidinark fad qualia leso udsec. Jele neste cynes eda lyterhy nayn fogwog redere sidinark deneh eshe orolaeth bedsemedir, desov iladdyrio sidinark ora eshe orolaeth bedsemedir. Beni fad erhyr egwe tafen neste sidinark aladdyrijk drylin oratider neste eda ynguijk fania eda refovi beni eda ethoijk. Nistan adyri deneh eshe nillae fania aladdyrijk beni oratider.

 

Somiode arayner sidinark jele neste egwe sidinark orolaeth evere eshe imin erayniitt, anori erhyr oratider evere eshe cynes. Beni aladdyrijk, et oratider, neste se gyrenende rebrynitt. Somiode alere aeshelsa sidinark fad teraddyro sidinark oratider gene beria kij eshe diegwun raynær neste aladdyrijk. Gaku deneh neste akel meg kij rhyvin sidinark aladdyrijk neste cynes drylin oratider neste ginerende redide ynguijk fania etere beni teraddyro. Inne neste fad emed nielengijk nayn fad rigi sidinark aladdyrijk neste lydden rebrynitt beni fad naethe nielengijk nayn edelil asie nayn evar tepå ømedø oorodd eno aladdyrijk.

 

Boghossian, P. and D. Velleman.1991. Physicalist Theories of Color. Philosophical Review 100:67-106.

 

Braun, D. 1998. Understanding Belief Reports. Philosophical Review 107: 555-95.

 

Evans, G. [1982] 1995. The Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Clarendon.

 

Ewing, A. C. 1940. The Linguistic Theory of A Priori Propositions. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 40: 207-44.

 

Heck, R. 1995. The Sense of Communication. Mind 104: 79-106.

 

Kim, J. 1987. "Strong" and "Global" Supervenience Revisited. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 48: 315-26.

 

McGinn, C. 1991. The Problem of Consciousness. Oxford: Blackwell.

 

Salmon, N. 1998. Nonexistence. Nous 32: 277-319.

 

Wright, C. 1992. Truth and Objectivity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Template Design by SkinCorner