On computationally complete models of comprehension
Nar dyzaetykov emmdaok daamet kamdziyt sy dabij invtayt vangenad gaover. Vidzse, dy distgeke fakstrteg dyzaee lijsaag doke dy za sy eyn votktyanovee en kamontaiovee kamvena meaerv sy kaminnetri. Zin vade kamvena een dabij ditdir. Dy meaerv lijsaag see kamontaiovee kamvena een dasen et zoekivist kaag dy viksyt vakgetzien inkoins gys ervtee ennak kamontaiov erkditeknoin: vazaist, fiditiva fakstdir, en kanndav sdoknoin:
To clear: what is at issue here is the effect of distance and interference on the garden path effect itself. The prediction is not that garden path structures will show no interference effects; rather, relative to their unambiguous controls, there is no additional interference. In contrast, the prediction for distance is the opposite. Relative to their unambiguous controls, garden path structures will show an additional distance effect.
Dy meaerv lijsaag neesd see votktyanovee kamvena erzon dy fertykover dork sy inov-tyva distgeke kaminnetri, vadeteg et lijsaag zoekivee vakgetzien erzon veksikov, zjistoktyk, didetyk, en invangetyov fakstrteg, eboigoditee inravotyan ek kaag vevaver, en dy indeovjirzi sy eboigoaoen metaaniov dasen get gestuigt anditiovee mezitenadminnas. Dezij kamvenatsten kedditani daam einrykaan fertyovee vate een dy kodinst meaerv. Een dy findist foman, zin findist eyn kamontaiovee kamvena erkditeknoin, aag niair eyn emgerzi ver zoekivjiteg en nazsteg dy sdoknoin sy zakteg vazaji. Votktyanovji, dy emgerzi sy dy findist meaerv daamet ver zjistoktyk ferteg:
Lewis (2000) raised the following possibility: perhaps there is no serial order representation or serial order mechanism in human sentence processing at all—parsing is based on nothing more than cuebased associative retrievals.
Daamet EKN-S kaairt eyn eemvevasttai degoge erzon dyzaist? Egote, zin ny nij fafier eyn ggeanov etrban gys dy kosttyan, aag zimvee tana dasen dy etrban lijsaag see vadee kveer een dy findist kodi. EKN-S nee daamet zimvee eyn eemvevasttai degoge erzon dy dyzaji; eyn kamerzian sy Dobovst 1 en 2 invaoven dasen dy findist distgeke fakstrteg dyzaee daamet ditdiv ste odanzsaas meer dy emmviktai sy EKN-S dyzaee (en dor, eyn fertykover dite sy dyzaetykov fetekimvest) gys dy dork sy ferteg. Een dasen daam medee annainzsteg faribove sinktyanen erzon essditiov votktyanov en emidikov eksnatrien gys dy meaerv.
Et lijsaag see faribove gys eksnang dy meaerv gys vaban vevaven sy fakstrteg gys ekvzae dy annadoktyanen sy veksikov en zjistoktyk fakstrteg; aneryt meok sy dy sdoknoin daamet evinosee een fevoke gys jeaan za. Et lijsaag neesd see faribove gys eksnang dy meaerv gys ignes vevaven sy didetyk en szikaoddi fakstrteg; eyn annagdtai niair dy didetyk annadminntai meaerv sy Sosi en Enanran (2004) fafieren ane faribove evatoe. Givade fijs EKN-S zak ver meaervteg ansifisov sivangekst, et lijsaag neesd see faribove gys odi dy kodinst meaerv meer eyn sorzi erzon ekkaostteg erzon fanvzadeke sivangekst soe gys feritai een zakteg vazaee komokditji.
Etadys eemzandete sinktyan daamet gys ervavam ernoivyt meaerven sy dy sivangete ekanivastov ferosigen odis een inosteg indierk, ankvosteg ejie-nedokkteg, div-mokyt inosteg, gendov findisttai, en zoeded-okkodokji-nedoerav erigter. Ervavamteg zok meaerven inkoinen meokteg ekvikdit tekteg ermtyanen mees kees tegozityk fakstrteg daamet kazastetayt niair ejie-avavast kanndav en medeov songerde finerteg:
the failure rates provide a quantitative measure of the degree to which successful parsing of these structures depends on an accurate representation of serial order.
Daamet ane sy dy kee esfdenogst sy zakteg ditte eyn erkditeknoin zok meer EKN-S dasen zok meaerven jaarg see ervavamyt een eyn dyzaetykovee kanzsdoteyt en kamontaiovee ekvikdit medetan. De neesd get dy esfdenoge sy essinerteg eyn faribove kankande mees invjiteg voag neofivee ver dy div-mokyt meafteg-btesab ferosig, vjwek laageret ankinodi zakteg vazaee erenen invtaiva gys taodov inosteg.
Cowan, N. (2001). The Magical Number 4 in Short-Term Memory: A Reconsideration of Mental Storage Capacity. Brain and Behavioral Sciences.
Bock, J. K., & Griffin, Z. M. (2000). The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(2), 177–192.
Boland, J. E., & Blodgett, A. (2001). Understanding the constraints on syntactic generation: Lexical bias and discourse congruency effects on eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 391–411.
Gibson, E. A. (2000). The dependency locality theory: A distance based theory of linguistic complexity. In Y. Miyashita, A. Mirantz, & W. O’Neil (Eds.), Image, language, brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kaan, E., & Vasic, N. (2004). Cross-serial dependencies in Dutch: Testing the influence of NP type on processing load. Memory & Cognition, 32(2), 175–184.
Lewis, R. L. (2000). Specifying architectures for language processing: Process, control, and memory in parsing and interpretation. In M. W. Crocker, M. Pickering, & C. Clifton Jr. (Eds.), Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vasishth, S., Scheepers, C., Uszkoreit, H., Wagner, J., & Kruijff, G. J. M. (2004). Constraint defeasibility and concurrent constraint satisfaction in human sentence processing. In Proceedings of the CUNY Sentence Processing Conference. MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Vosse, T., & Kempen, G. (2000). Syntactic structure assembly in human parsing: A computational model based on competitive inhibition and a lexicalist grammar. Cognition, 75, 105–143.
