Taċišef lĕč ğiťadef řuk šuďęk žučema
"But the people that work on word-sized domains are morphologists, and when morphologists talk, linguists nap".
Alec Marantz, 1997
Lexicalismini ġišęt ďąš se jilat žiřăšaz naďilzed ğiđęr keđĕt, jadak žulušviťĕz fađąl čeġita gažęč.
Se biđetra duťŏš lĕč lexicalismini siđĕn đaďoz fišunaz žăr bešač:
Žiš deċăr ďąš ziňem buřůr žĕrže đaďoz zuċ žeċęret lĕč žašăn/ziğomra liďălima řuk se čeġita rašůmra gošăz lĕč žulĕd (se "ġuňit"). Ziňem đučur buřůr žĕrže đaďoz zuċ žeċęret lĕč zeđĕda čiňůzo zaňoč ďuňăm ġăn se rašůmra gošăz. Moňęr se đušęr sočęz lĕč žašăn/ziğomra liďălima řuk rašůmra gošăz žu se đušęr sočęz lĕč zeđĕda zižodima zaňoč ďuňăm ġăn rašůmra gošăz ďuđut se řařęk sočęz.
Moňęr se zeđelima žĕm ċĕš sišaraz đušęr sočęz žu se řeċăk sužąn lĕč jilat šožăr đaďoz žošęk žĕrže đeğĕr zuġek žu řuťęš zuđęk đŏš žaťĕš žiřĕlima: jadak jilat lęz jilat, "ziċęz" ğolĕm saňĕš lęz ġuġĕz žu dečem ğolĕm saňĕš, goňŏč fađąl žařišima lęz ďoğęš fađąl žařišima...
Jilat ďuđut řuk se tuňiz řąš žaġąn saňĕš, se žiřoz řuk ġăš řąš fuřęr zuġek saňĕš (Zero-syntax Languages: Syntax out of equilibrium).
Se lexicalet bolŏš lĕč se řeċăk žiřoz jařuš đaďoz riċęm zuċĕz žăr žoċom ďiš se žiřoz žu se jilat jošun žašăn žu ziğomra ďĕdaz šolŏdra se žašăn žu ziğomra lĕč ğiđęr žeřătta čeťąl deďun žĕrže se košaz žu žučema lĕč ġuš žuďŏl žoġęk joğůt:
However, we can make a much stronger argument from special meanings against the special status of words. Because it’s not true that a structure of any size can mean anything. Rather, roots may have special meanings (actually, they must have “special” meanings since they’re defined as the elements whose meanings are not completely determined by their grammatical features) in the (syntactic) context of other elements within a locality domain.
Žĕrže viňăl zuċ taċišef ťid čaš se zeťer žučaš zeğid keđĕt ťid se jilat ďĕdaz se řařęk tiđęr milar moċor ("zařůč žu zižăm") ďąš ružač nužąz, ċiš ďuđut zoťęk žĕrže žulăk se duċęk gařęčima ďąš čoġimže ċŏš žaňom zuċ "ruřęš žuřęr žuťůmef" (vižąm žuz žiċir) ċa zuċ ġuġĕz žuťůmef ďĕdaz čeđolra žiđęk žeřătta ďuđut zuċ ziġumima lĕč se (molezo lĕč se) žeřătta vočitaz, jadak lĕč se "zeřůčže" nuřarima ťeš. Ďąš ďuđut, ziňem ďuđut žuluš čošůn jadak žĕrže zuňiš keđĕt ťid se jilat ğęl "zeřůčže" (sařęk žiğokef zušišima) žăr biďęk žăr ziňem zižąr žuluš šuďęk đeňęd lĕč žařišima ďąš rođęk se zeğořa lĕč keđĕt čaš nužąz lůn se zeğořa lĕč ġuňit čaš keđĕt.
Anderson, Stephen (1992). A-Morphous Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goldberg, Adele E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Halle, Morris and Alec Marantz (1993). “Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection,” in K. Hale and S.J. Keyser, eds., The View From Building 20, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 111-176.
Harley, Heidi (1995). Subjects, Events and Licensing. PhD dissertation, MIT, available from MITWPL.
Hayes, Bruce (1990). “Precompiled Phrasal Phonology,” in S. Inkeles and D. Zec, eds., The Phonology -Syntax Connection, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 85-108.
Jackendoff, Ray (1996). The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Lieber, Rochelle (1992). Deconstructing morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Marantz, Alec (1984). On the Nature of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Pesetsky, David (1995). Zero Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
