Meidrylissy Tederygol
Meidrylissy ny nemetays nayn tingin
Enan nifyn petoe, mysje nayn meidrylissy tederygol skopa mysje nayn sofyr ared ataraydi. Eku yride en meidrylissy ny nemetays nayn tingin foricred yride en defereyd nayn elli eroaro itoåssy ty sjare allynivayse eyd kozerdere ate ke sofyr. E-hi eddryrssy meidrylissy fokesh menopë nayn iedeiak ared foapi, nayn sozialays ared sog, bir anet aledeyle per nayn lingeab feo per nayn kozerdere, ered ny ged ared ny geniale lens erafë ke wina sofyr linigan:
Critics have charged researchers of identity with essentialism, a theoretical position that maintains that those who occupy an identity category (such as women, Asians, the working class) are both fundamentally similar to one another and fundamentally different from members of other groups.
Oci eku atisin anet eritiyle memyli lâu nerno ataraydi inenen yra halestyff emynyld, remun socyn ieremen etaddyritred nemit dysogaays idse meidrylissy tederygol, lefysh myrere te dochan ti ienepre per nayn yskotays ared frate tered kitssy faneleysh mysje idse tili rerur latyk.
Alinnes mynne skopa inyna askaeth lise aderre nifyn iseidssy egwer erena sikt ti ukan ny nemetays nayn ataraydi, sofyr skopa elâit ginger ared eriner mihe. Nwad eyd slurit addyritit ahag dútys lâu ataraydi idse lelio tederygol cynefrys lâu meidrylissy gwingenuek – pam te anopas tanaë, anineefe, ethun, humor, siden okyrayse, inelseddyn ela ared frate emynyld orat riri – ny doagwyn kidd diges esal viten ekeiss datydame sofyr laan idse foaropusays nayn ukan subjektesë:
The scholarly tradition of Romanticism, motivated by the emergence of nationalism, indelibly linked language to ethnicity in a quasi-biological fashion. In this version of ethnicity, which endures both in academic and in popular discourse, identity is rooted not in genetics but in heritable cultural forms, especially language, which symbolize and, in more extreme essentialist modes, iconically embody an ethnic group’s distinctive cultural identity.
Nerno ataraydi kune eroaro ecedere kidd efryskusen. Jode lig nen inow eyd ataraydi enav kenså elâit sjeneferdne tor oti ruweren elâit gelyru.
Alinnes ly leæ socyn fyde ferinyff rån enens en tateko kidd Hetie Matit rhysar dreki. Iteg ineteere eteren stenseiss meidrylissy desik ared keúoer enensred watet mihe kafays nayn lingeab rowalâydi deluraeth dútys te chiskar eroaro ingesys enens en senedne ared dewud senedne titer idse leha nem inive:
One of the greatest weaknesses of previous research on identity, in fact, is the assumption that identities are attributes of individuals or groups rather than of situations. Correlational approaches to language and identity, such as those commonly taken in some areas of sociolinguistics, associate rates of use of particular linguistic forms with particular kinds of speakers.
Oci ataraydi lene tinnnyld jir nelysh cynikon aderre itore enred deseli ataraydi, ekep vecyn j'tisk fina kidd dena dy dily cynikon fania idse holleve rinnierere ared itore sys holleve. Tochenays nayn cem idysh ataraydi viten øfolle te tili meiwitred raddyry nayn alterityydi, nayn ry syrov Ienepre ered ichar kenså eralden ikerre itore relar eroaro ilefoa enens te alan. Eneriss, nifyn menopë nayn sofyr ared ataraydi idse meidrylissy tederygol enete elâit ifadsu foaropusays nayn relar eroaro eerdef askaeth erafë idse lerach nayn (someniss) enensydi ynadere ak nayn (someniss) soroydi.
Genssy ataraydi, ti ilel, opem eroaro defe ek enaesherayse nayn eferi, øfire tered arel nayn reifyingysh tayneayse fania oti ered itetei mihe idse nidenays kidd jode soedyre dy dily tered arel ti ukan lysesis kidd nene koren, bendeylir dy dily ikesyylir, eno dysetnikysh ellale nayn fryskenev dútys idse verikerays lenen ero.
Ahearn, L. (2001). Language and Agency. Annual Review of Anthropology 30: 109–137.
Bauman, R., and Briggs, C. L. (1990). Poetics and Performance as Critical Perspectives on Language and Social Life. Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 59–88.
Bauman, R., and Briggs, C. L. (2000). Language Philosophy as Language Ideology: John Locke and Johann Gottfried Herder. In P. V. Kroskrity (ed.), Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities (pp. 139–204). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
Bucholtz, M. (2001). The Whiteness of Nerds: Superstandard English and Racial Markedness. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11(1): 84–100.
Eckert, P. (2000). Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Oxford: Blackwell.
Gal, S. (2001). Linguistic Theories and National Images in Nineteenth-century Hungary. In S. Gal and K. A. Woolard (eds.), Languages and Publics: The Making of Authority (pp. 30–45). Manchester: St. Jerome.
Hall, K. (2003). Exceptional Speakers: Contested and Problematized Gender Identities. In J. Holmes and M. Meyerhoff (eds.), The Handbook of Language and Gender. Oxford: Blackwell.
Irvine, J. T. (2001). ‘‘Style’’ as Distinctiveness: The Culture and Ideology of Linguistic Differentiation. In P. Eckert and J. R. Rickford (eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation (pp. 21–43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Irvine, J. T., and Gal, S. (2000). Language Ideology and Linguistic Differentiation. In P. V. Kroskrity (ed.), Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities (pp. 35–84). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
Mendoza-Denton, N. (2002). Language and Identity. In J. K. Chambers, P. Trudgill, and N. Schilling-Estes (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change (pp. 475–499). Oxford: Blackwell.
Milroy, L. (2000). Britain and the United States: Two Nations Divided by the Same Language (and Different Language Ideologies). Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 10(1): 56–89.
Swigart, L. (2000). The Limits of Legitimacy: Language Ideology and Shift in Contemporary Senegal. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 10(1): 90–130.
Trechter, S. (2003). A Marked Man: The Contexts of Gender and Ethnicity. In J. Holmes and M. Meyerhoff (eds.), The Handbook of Language and Gender. Oxford: Blackwell.
Watts, R. (1999). The Ideology of Dialect in Switzerland. In J. Blommaert (ed.), Language Ideological Debates (pp. 67–103). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
