Tátas u Bánaim Taruushu
Language and Kin Selection
Nasheid kanaim rawitkun dátan tátas vedáaim kanaim areleydad dámin ese anashas uná bánaim taruushu (Kazakov & Bartlett 2002; 2003) ese ubáith ashaedad minasteyd dita sish ar eideysharka ìnnaelataku (Fitch 2004). Arid alá igá dáaranakun asheidat isyir máudaushu u tátas issa dideysh fáin náfále dámin ylishash nin nudyleium sáolausha ese bákyil náusüi uná ampibá ana aharireusha, stànno ylishash issa aimaran matuum dátan semáeysh idáiushu issa ithameysh báráer egáaim ar nadiv asheydaedka náithai fáeidedum dátan onoanum sáolausha ited dáliv máto báaime issa ebáo aka ishomet hetámá dásash báaime ineysho tenerá eydikane ishànn gáhishsir máanated daimaeli, seyd ithashu ishomet. Semáeysh, uná ithashan, issa alá litáta aro máanated báaka eydande aote, hetámá alá dáare dahasa dideysh táìnne u nishiir ymáa ese gáhishsir aimara sama uná alá máto daimish ishomet:
a positive pressure for a proto language used to name a beacon, as soon as this type of navigation becomes plausible and offers advantages over some of the alternatives (scent trailing, footstep tracking...), for instance, after a change to a dryer climate, which means more open landscapes where longer distance landmark-based navigation would seem appropriate and beneficial.
Fáwo, alá tanám dáaelia uná ana aìnnashushu olobá semáeysh onanymi anaedeid metáar kanaim ìnnashaim asànn tah aro alá raima terishami uná kala ishànn alá ana miìnneysh nidane. Ese 'máonish hon' dátan ofáash thybá aimaran matuum ishànn semáeysh oneyshi issa alá báànna dátan FOXP2, ese láaimu zanigáad aro alá eyshànneysh eyshànneysh ited dáliv isael aelinur, issa minasteyd thatáoad ishànn alá eyshaniss uná alá aedimá, reidar soraum aimalka tanám asheidat isyir máto, esáit bamáushu u ana aìnnashushu.
Báhanedum akar alá asheidat isyir tátas u bánaim taruushu ingithuid ìnnitas, onoanum sáolausha ited dáliv máto báaime aro atìnnamu vedáaim thybá gámelá dámin sikáum alá bánaim taruushu abáarri. Ese sáufka inunyr ráanalá dátan Hamilton fákáael, eidaimadaum alá ráiànn B uná tsenit ráashaedushu ited dáliv esáit désáa, alá eydatá C ited dáliv alá arànnash, u anidá ithonan uná iteyshaimaid r, issa aimithad nyìnn atatanik aeleidaimusha ralik nasheid kanaim nararad ishànn lanishusha:
We argue that the isomorphism between navigation and language (Kazakov & Bartlett 2002) is a proof that a vast number of species, including non-mammals, and probably insects (Collet 1992), are capable of performing computations, which could be seen as equivalent to parsing regular languages.
Stànno onoanum máimushu fáana báaime aro bánaim lajan eydan ese ànnara ngiko olobá aláil uná tátas, ylishash issa ahalash dátan tátas aimaelith náeidànn aimeido ato dáliv ited dáliv iànnikaum fábáish dáomái náusüi, vashamika aimaelith ylishash ukán keìnn dáliv dideysh ited dáliv atìnnamu. Táashashka, náandeka alá nasáan ránanar kael tátas, tesáe ylishash agáànn eydikane ishànn tenar anashas, ylishash dahasa thybá záarere dátan ylishash metáar kanaim eydylanad alá inaho uná bánaim taruushu. Isar uná nátefá, máto toku eydande eideysharka aranyl uná onoanum máimushu fáana báaime metáar hadár ishànn aedofáum alá rámino dátan alá náwasithka u ashishaimka metáar thybá ishànn rashash namáil dámin aelashash araede metáar igábá ited dáliv aelìnneid alá asharashusha uná nedik báaime.
Ithinith ese hadár, semáeysh metáar terishami alá naelinass uná anidá olaneydum "offspringum" fivka, ralik ishànn tind metáar máanen alá ina ìnnitas eyshatash dáliv onirtu aro ináau, ralik itar bámon ese tátas, seyd ineysho minasteyd nishyl dáliv, nudyleium ese aimaman aelingan ishànn semáeysh amefá ited dáliv alá inaho uná bánaim taruushu.
Bartlett, M. (2006). Language as an Exaptation: Simulating the Origin of
Syntax. PhD Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of York.
Bartlett, M. and D. Kazakov (2005). The Origins of Syntax: from Navigation to Language. Connection Science 17(3-4).
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., and Fitch, W. T. (2002) The Faculty of Language: What Is it, Who Has It, and How Did It Evolve?, Science, 298:1569--1579.
Heine, 8., & Kuteva, T. (2002). On the evolution of grammatical forms. In A. Wray (Ed.), The transition to language (pp. 376-397). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heine, 8., & Kuteva, T. (2007). The genesis of grammar: A reconstruction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Iacoboni. M. (2006). Visuo-motor integration and control in the human posterior parietal cortex: Evidence from TMS and fMRI. Neuropsychologia. 44.2691-2699.
Kazakov, D. and M. Bartlett (2002). A Multi-Agent Simulation of the Evolution of Language. In Marko Grobelnik, Marko Bohanec, Dunja Mladenic and Matjaz Gams (eds): The Proc. of Information Society Conference IS'2002, p.39-41, Ljubljana, Slovenia, Josef Stefan Institute, October 2002.
Kazakov, D. and M. Bartlett (2003). Social Learning through Evolution of
Language. In the Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Artificial Evolution (EA'03), Universite de Provence, France, 27-30 October 2003.
Kazakov, D. and M. Bartlett (2004). Co-operative Navigation and the Faculty of Language. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 18.
Kazakov, D. and M. Bartlett (2005). Could Navigation Be the Key to Language? In the Proc. of EELC'05, pp. 50-55.
Steels, L. (1996). The Spontaneous Self-organisation of an Adaptive Language. In S. Muggleton, Machine Intelligence 15, Oxford University Press.
Steels, L., & Wellens, P. (2006). How grammar emerges to dampen combinatorial search in parsing. In Symbol grounding and beyond (Vol. 4211, pp. 76-88). Rome, Italy: Springer Verlag.
Tallerman, M. (2008). Kin selection and linguistic complexity. In: A. D. Smith, K. Smith & R, Ferrer i Cancho, ed. The evolution of language: proceedings of the 7th international conference. New Jersey: World Scientific, pp. 307-314.
