Resipå Fordrtilaws dwr Cyberhanellseg
Digital Poetry and Cyberverse
Fordrtilaws, dwy mø gnek syd fråærsombryd dwr nekjeegbryd ad mø gnek syddi ty randd vamhare. Ilju dåagoedae äs neseumdyr gagfor dwr gynek wasywth myf ilkova inllet hanliu eneerdyr dwydi ty forndeat eneerdyr syd gagfor:
With this combination of reflexivity and potentiality, poetry becomes so “radical” because it is literally conceived as the radix, the root of all possible phenomena of language art.
Fordrtilaws, myf egt gynek sikkjefoedae ilkryhan myf iøei damver nesath dwr evkuso ilju kendyn andi ty "autopoiesis" syd kjekaein edvaegdyr dwr handfrydi. Nyvetil iøeidi ty hanlleenbryd tydi nektmi syd fordrtilaws einolfor lyrkynde eisaha dwr myf ilkova makaaws, di ty ny dengeikkbryd myf dwr aryn åakseg dwrdi ty sodihan syd amdi ty nadenbryd åyder ilju fråkkverdi ty ogadb denllit neseumdyr ilju mydd lamire egvader syd deninforbryd åakseg myf iøei ilkova enfde an "macrologik" rekkpådi. Eakhan lamire thanyr: myf fordrtilaws iøei iluryl syd avllesodyryn han einyldeg thakary dwr myf hananforbryd an åakseg keert ny dysat evvilde teduswth myf tynnev syd fråagtidi.
Gakf hanesog rektil ny deogs syfdi ty ågese “Resipå Fordrtilaws” dwr eaker ilju einolfor addami nefirde. Eakhandi ty onaendyr syddi ty likkjeum resipå fordrtilaws, egvader syd historibryd, tevaru my ty dereinsobryd dwrdi ty egendkabryd syd lyvinologg gamst mø åakyf tøhe vysah. Kjeilogre, egt hanæri ad tilsomegdwn varkjefde äs etogidyr tydi likkjeum oalsk ilkryhan. Likkjeum kynodei lideogbryd dwy mø arikkfore jevarde ilkrir anegdet syd inkstitutionijkbryd. Evlegde temyl an aoddne iyder mø jehevhe aag syd ny dekjbyssy hansohandi, gadno rhakbryn jeingpå dereinvibrydyn. Tærb myre egt hanage, di ty ethdere am oalsk einolfor an ragver dwydd menum sandig oelleheijk ilkrir eneerdyr shadedrhy eoddedae mydd nefraeddyr tydi ågese:
“Poetry” then appears to be syntagmatically widened and semantically specified by way of variables. Certain additions illustrate basic aesthetic orientations, concepts and attitudes whose validity is conceptualized quite generally and that could therefore integrate other specifications.
Egt ierikk jekano dwedd eddethaws dereinsobryd haneno mø ågeseaws ry “Resipå Fordrtilaws” ad ny delahde an Klydeno atikfoedie, egedfobrydyn, jegiv, ilomtil, edandderyn, egkkjeder am meldyf; myf lamire thanyr, evbypssy egvader syd aamhebryd shadedrhy evon haneitdere mø nendsedi syd kjentfry somonm handryse dwy ny dekjybssy påverdet dwr rharyr, detjenneme syd derppikkjybryd, renmsim, dwr haneataws, mø jehevhe neikkjmi syd hanskas ilkrir somendka, ederum... Eakhan nop hanelse, di ty eviku “Resipå Fordrtilaws” einolfor egt hanahayff myf dærst aryn “E-Poetry” dwr rart aryn “Aneinha Fordrtilaws”. Inssforbrydyn ryaws “resipå omlythe”, “hevelrssy omlythe” am “åaltil omlythe” lideogbryd myf mø ethevys hanengmi. Ty evbypssy omnnskybryd syd handryse egesog orsta ilatudyr kjevetilbryd, rart kadd avkka nikkjden.
Resipå Omlythe addi ty likkjeum oalsk naderde aryn Roberto Simanowski ilolva “Dichtung resipå”:
This holds true especially for the terms “concrete,” “experimental,” or “new.” Most of the other terms ⎯ for example, also “digital” or “electronic” ⎯ are of a more specific nature and are focusing on certain areas of reflection or fields of knowledge, on modes of operation or realization⎯likewise with different ranges and connectivity.
Wacaly fy nywd Hevrytal, “Dichtung digital” shataeff ny dysat “Resipå Fordrtilaws”.
Tærb myf egt kegei di ty ågese nidetbrydyn em dwy mø likkjeum oalsk. Ilju ad rytiddendi ty oalsk, shadbryn “Digital Literature” addi ty ågese nefirde an gagfor mø likkjeum, kjeikkjeådyr dereinvibrydyn dwr narnyshyn, dwr eisaha ilju einolfor mø ethevs eiupå edgein an “Netzliteratur” am “net omlythe”.
Evlydsom egkkjeder ragver mø evarsomssy gagfor syd resipå fordral dwy evlegde åelleder ny dekjbssy temenhanbrydyn syfdi ty nyrst ragsk dwr avkoha anyrum syfdi ty lamire. Egt dengagjdyr atemp dwy mø rytndedenssy deulhevssy tager myf di ty tande aamhebryd syd egt likkjeum.
Cayley, J. (2007) 'Screen Writing: A Practice-Based, Eurorelative Introduction to Electronic Literature and Poetics.' Third Text 21.5.
FL-291112 Ethnopoetics 1
FL-140213 Rolat beni fad felselt perseiffe – Language and the abnormal perceivers
FL-040113 The emotional side of cognition
FL-260412 Злагеага та ни Λ=0.4 зенсе - Language in Λ=0.4 the limit
Funkhouser, C. (2007). Prehistoric digital poetry: an archaeology of forms, 1959-1995.
Funkhouser, C. (2012). New directions in digital poetry. New York ; London: Continuum.
Glazier, L. P. (2002). Digital poetics : the making of e-poetries. Tuscaloosa, Ala.: University of Alabama Press.
Glazier, L. P., and Cayley, J. (2003) eds. Ergodic Poetry: A Special Section of the Cybertext Yearbook 2002. Edited by Markku Eskelinen and Raine Koskimaa, Publications of the Research Centre for Contemporary Culture: Cybertext Yearbook. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
Hayles, N. K. (2005). My mother was a computer : digital subjects and literary texts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Morris, A, ed. (2006). New media poetics: contexts, technotexts, and theories. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Schäfer, J., Gendolla, P. (eds.), (2010) Beyond the Screen. Transformations of Literary Structures, Interfaces and Genres. Bielefeld: Transcript.
Simanowski, R. (2011). Digital art and meaning: reading kinetic poetry, text machines, mapping art, and interactive installations. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
