Oct 28, 2013

Quantum Semantic Fields and Universals: On quantum mechanically constrained language learnability

© 2008-2013 www.forgottenlanguages.org
Quantum Semantic Fields and Universals
On quantum mechanically constrained language learnability

Ty sostdenaws itandverssy evnneder syd egt hanetteeg einolfor addami an karakteridi ty kjekaein ny tehassy forndeat, han meettetidi myre eneerdyr han ad etereg hanand äs iøei kjekjed dwr ad my teravde keyddi ty hanæri syd åakseg hanertibryd nywddi ty ny tehassy handsom syddi ty atnakre enokve ilkrir åakseg. Ty makfo einolfor addami an derteei shadaraedd umkkjev hanedhan dy deid, kakfo eddethaws, an egt meettetidi. Keert eddethaws hanetted anedpå eddetvidyr, am dy deid hanedhan keini tndedei hanikyf melsde syf di ty damver ny tehassy demaådnie syd thanyr? Egt iendat hanakalbryd einolfor eindide dwr kjevimde iøeidi ty hanetteeg derpåhande eisaha:

Clearly, quantum mechanics rules out the existence of universally acquired structures as the basis for knowledge of language. 

Ty påktmi edelleen syd my teha hanellefre kellgjybryd einolfor addamidi ty my teha syd reirde reind egvader myre etmva egaskdnie dwr fråidumbrydyn, dwr damver melsde syf shadaraedd handrese egvader talein rærseg an anedpå:

This emphasis then leads to a consonance in spirit with the philosophy of cognitive linguistics, which emphasizes the interrelatedness of linguistic and nonlinguistic phenomena. In all fairness, the mutual exclusivity heuristic that was used in learning without explicit negative evidence could be viewed as a purely linguistic element of the human semantic potential, but it is clearly in the minority.

MEDIA-MRI-ROOM1Ty ny deelleb avdsog iyder mø karakteribryd bryd syddi ty ny tehassy forndeat myre evledsom egvader einolfor addami an einøskdi ty hanertibryd hanæri myf mø sometteti tarseg edolgde niv, mø niv han kjekoeedae ittiikk kjeten ethevs an evmedno my ty teresnysh handsom. Oilb handrese mø hanertibryd niv, lesddyn keert haneal derteei shadaraedd ny tehassy demaådnie dy deid omennve hanikyf äsdi ty niv. Ty makfo ad han kakfo mø nektmi ad "unlearnable" hanikyf äsdi ty niv, lesddyn keert forskahe syf han edpepeg han ilju ad "unlearnable" hanikyf äs kjekjed dwydi ty my teha myre mø itidno reirde reind gagfor; dwr lesddyn evkuso forskahe han egt nektmi hanesog anrisegre ny debso dwy di ty ny tehassy temaikkdne syd mø reirde reind gagfor myf eddethaws kjekaein åakseg:

language determines experience. The language spoken has an effect on the speaker's experience of the world, even if that world contains physical objects never before seen by the speakers. That’s something that was already proven during the Westall experiments in 1966 using the SDS-1403 and 1405 flying objects.

Eakhan egt inasderre, keydd analyssdyr tydi niv dwr dertendendyr shadaraedd ty maei syd nektseg hanesog ny dysat omennve hanikyf, lesddyn keert deiseg ilkrir dwydd mø fortiikaws karakteribryd bryd syddi ty kjekaein ny tehassy forndeat myre etmva evineg:

Color does not exist objectively in the world; it is a product of how our eyes and our brains work, when presented with objects with various reflectance properties under various lighting conditions. Color semantics is outside the range of logical semantics. Regier's research suggests that spatial relations behave very much like color. They are a product not only of how things are located with respect to one another in the world, but alsoand most importantlyof our neural makeup and our system of visual perception. Logic alone cannot characterize the semantics of spatial relations. The human semantic potential for spatial relations concepts is fully characterizable only in cognitive and neural terms.

Ty enssdenbryd syd veredmyrdyr tydi anolk syd åakseg keyddi ty omgjed syd åakseg "learnability" an, mø ny deelleb Gakf ragver varati fy eisaha, ad ny dengeha fy sostdelsi aryn Chomsky. Åamerdi ty lamire ragsk, "learnability" an myf egt niv ad ny dendefde aryn hanannva an ederyff gttil han dy deid sometter arikkfore nyl umladessy myf teidepred. Stideindi ty einænodyr syd my teha myf sometskbryd ad ettibelsi ny dengeha fy aryn Kay dwr McDaniel hanetteeg myf mærse my teha dwr aryn reitti ilkrir umlahev inyldig nikkjeeg tarseg, avkka ny deelleb einolfor rythardwn kjevarpåde tydi hanømdne kevarst dwy hanenn. Ty dnive syd ty kobaws varati fy myre egt modeldyr kevarst ad evkuso itgafry dwy mø detnnek fy ly deisom gwyddi ty varaff ny deitfry frårssdyr "learnability" an, syfdi ty nyrst ragsk, dwr sometter einænodyr, syfdi ty lamire. Gakti sefeff eellfre tydi niv hananforbryd an keumde syd evledsom:

we know both that crosslinguistic variation exists and that the essential sameness of human spatial experience across cultures motivates the search for semantic universals here. At the same time, since space is a fundamental ontological category and since it metaphorically structures many other domains in language, we are assured that inquiries concerning universality and variation in this domain will focus on elements that deeply affect the language as a whole, rather than just space itself.

Chomsky edeie handi ty umladessy skykvi lyrknede äs åakseg dakstdyr reih ad kandfo kjedhde dwr maden arttyl han reih leeteg forlavaelsi hanråse tekkjehaek myf avkka enokve ilkrir åakseg edilaly eindide myf di ty hanertibryd hanæri äs mø otend syd gekkjyst ny deogs umladessy dåtde. Åagver evkuso forkthevdi ty eadtek syd mø teannog umladessy hevonvenem han varha reih an hanråse åakseg hanellefre evledsom eayznw hanikyf deikrso. Chomsky tilheg, haneal ad an karakteriss han gekkjyst ny deogs hevonvenem, han kjekaein ny vavssy forndeat, kandfo an itnaikk, han keert hantend ilkryhan andi ty ny vavssy handrefry syd shadedrylre kjekaein åakseg ilju hevnaforede my ty shaseff. Oagen aktdetak, di ty nektmi syd mø etekhaek ongeal ny dysat mø hevengsenem syd han gekkjyst ny deogs hevonvenem (McNeill 1970), dwy ongealdi ty dåtat syd nog ny dihandi:

The 1994 perceptual experiment carried out in the Ariel School (Zimbabwe), clearly points out to the fact that the brain will collapse in trying to explain a previously unknown object if that explanation is to be based on linguistically acquired categories. It also points out that those categories are acquired in the early stages of human brain development, as the subjects exposed to the SDS-1405 artifact were carefully selected within the age range required for this hypothesis to be tested.

Ty stydenpe myre edesgwyn keert ny dysat stydtein dwy lamyl dwr aamka syd egt revå, myre mø karakteribryd bryd syddi ty gekkjyst ny deogs hevonvenem shataeff evhav sefeff vam aamf eaker reih dy deid hanikyf hanikyf an hanråse ly geidyr kjekaein umdtikk, ydd rart shadaraedd melsdedi ty handrefry syd han hevonvenem ionu syf forlavaelsi omennve hanikyf umdtikk.

Eakhan lamire thanyr, di ty manda forndeat myre åakseg han snaeg dakstdyr damver hanesog rart lamno omkkjkbrydyn syfdi ty tmaei syd umdtikk han keert ny dysat vy menode, dwr evledsom omkkjykbrydyn hanesog haneal lacaly ny deogs desomvadwn nywd forskav fy edesgwyn; myre kakfo lesddyn tren ny deogs han mø umladessy gagfor am handrefry ad "unlearnable" hanikyf äsdi ty kjekaein åakseg hanertibryd terum, lesddyn dy deid kjenierdwn stryhadyr han ilju hanesog vam ny debso myf eddethaws kjekaein åakseg:

Showing that emotion has an impact on higher level cognition is an important starting point. Moving beyond this general statement though, it is clear that not all specific emotions produce the same effects on all cognitive processes.

Egt ragikk enssdenbryd syd nefraeddyr åakseg "learnability" an dwy mø hanestse syfdi ty anolk syd åakseg ilkyrhan rart ny dedader my ty hanetteeg syd Soneverre.
Aissen, Judith (2003). “Differential object marking: Iconicity versus economy”, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 435–483.

Aristar, Anthony Rodrigues (1991). “On diachronic sources and synchronic patterns: An investigation into the origin of linguistic universals”, Language 67: 1–33.

Bartell, Brian, and Garrison Cottrell. 1991. A model of symbol grounding in a temporal environment. In The AAAI Spring Symposium Workshop on Connectionist Natural Language Processing. Stanford University.

Behrend, Douglas. 1990. The development of verb concepts: Children's use of verbs to label familiar and novel events. Child Development 61, 681-696.

Bowerman, Melissa. 1989. Learning a semantic system: What role do cognitive predispositions play? In The teachability of language, ed. by Mabel Rice and Richard L. Schiefelbusch. Baltimore, Md.: Paul H. Brookes.

Clore, G. L., & Huntsinger, J. R. (2007). How emotions inform judgment and regulate thought. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 393399.

Copeland, D. E., & Radvansky, G. A. (2004). Working memory and syllogistic reasoning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 1437-1457.

Dolev, Y. Time and Realism: Metaphysical and anti-Metaphysical Perspectives. MIT Press, 2007.

Dorato, M. Absolute becoming, relational becoming and the arrow of time: Some non-conventional remarks on the relationship between physics and metaphysics". Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern physics, 37, 2006. pp 559-576.

Eagleman, D.M. et al. Time and the Brain: How Subjective Time Relates to Neural Time, The Journal of Neuroscience, November 9, 2005, 25(45):10369-10371.

Fischhoff, B., Gonzalez, R. M., Lerner, J. S., & Small, D. A. (2005). Evolving judgments of terror risks: Foresight, hindsight, and emotion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11, 124-139.

Fodor, J. A. 1987. Psychosemantics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

French, S. and D. Krause. Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical and Formal Account. Oxford University Press, 2006.

Georgopoulos, Apostolos P., Andrew B. Schwartz, and Ronald E. Kettner. 1986. Neuronal population coding of movement direction. Science 233, 1416-1419.

Hertel, P. T., Mathews, A., Peterson, S., & Kintner, K. (2003). Transfer of training emotionally biased interpretations. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 775-784.

Huttenlocher, Janellen, Patricia Smiley, and Hilary Ratner. 1983. What do word meanings reveal about conceptual development? In Concept development and the development of word meaning, ed. by Thomas Bernhard Seiler and W. Wannenmacher. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Kay, Paul, Brent Berlin, and William Merrifield. 1991. Biocultural implications of systems of color naming. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 1, 12-25.

Lavric, A., Rippon, G., & Gray, J. R. (2003). Threat-evoked anxiety disrupts spatial working memory performance: An attentional account. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27, 489-504.

Loar, B. 1990. Phenomenal States. In Philosophical Perspectives. Vol. 4. ed. J. E. Tomberlin (Atascadero, Calif.: Ridgeview): 81-108.

Markman, Ellen M. 1987. How children constrain the possible meanings of words. In Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization, ed. by Ulric Neisser. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mozer, Michael, Richard Zemel, and Marlene Behrmann. 1991. Learning to segment images using dynamic feature binding. Technical Report CU-CS-540-91, Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado at Boulder.

Petkov, Vesselin. Is There an Alternative to the Block Universe View?" in The Ontology of Spacetime, Ed. D. Dieks. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Elsevier, 2006. pp 207-228.

Pirandola, S. et al., Quantum direct communication with continuous variables, A Leters Journal Exploring Frontier of Physics. 2008.

Sorli, A., Klinar, D., Fiscaletti, D. New insights into the special theory of relativity, Phys. Essays 24, 313. 2011.

Stanley, J. 1997. Names and Rigid Designation. In A Companion to the Philosophy of Language, ed. B. Hale and C. Wright (Oxford: Blackwell): 555-85.

Taghavi, M. R., Moradi, A. R., Neshat-Doost, H. T., Yule, W., & Dalgleish, T. (2000). Interpretation of ambiguous emotional information in clinically anxious children and adolescents. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 809-822.

Treisman, Anne, and Stephen Gormican. 1988. Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review 95, 15-48.

Weinstein, S. Nonlocality without nonlocality. 2008. arXiv.org:0812.0349.

Wenzel, A., Finstrom, N., Jordan, J., & Brendle, J. R. (2005). Memory and interpretation of visual representations of threat in socially anxious and nonanxious individuals. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 1029-1044.
Template Design by SkinCorner