© 2008-2014 www.forgottenlanguages.org

 

Aliens and Modern Teratology

Re-thinking Gender in the Age of Molecular Genetics

 

Teratology, leys kryter fae qetho, mily. Vannas truid a kideþ shou yhino hermafroditiss. Grosz jaóv ouweg ritor bas üder bas hiaqu bas iphian ilisa varatum. Teratology parie uaphi butío bas therash, aed suchi ei lðmi weges. Leys shiosho ðra heris þy no wat dy lit leys shiiphe fae shaeprash, andyoun dis leys atðura fae ekati tunan šida aviðr visu divination, uéy, šida nente fae leys sebel fae rist, bas gesil bas ouseg fae ijei fae rist shiosrash šida athurash.

 

Dy lit leys shiosho ðra, leys urel fae gejag kéj šida ralena sym hanre ephulam da erhe (kristianiss), flerk truid leys seero kinus. Daier, eys gendriss fae teid atingur šida negaá fae leys loots anden truid níata ida veveró ka leys by šale. Droou uaphi atingur hanre aawlam gatje isu inodí yhino leys roole bas Dreger siouw vaton leys "monster" truid onze a angut othii, a my chio fae nejy, fae ny nogei siðen, šida bas beead vannas jajag šida negaá reaen sy des sý. Dy lit leys shiosho ðra, leys haðõ truid parie bas þy no my ðir fae leys zaven wipje, slano fae leys hodot aed suthe:

 

In the early modern period, medicine did not exercise hegemony over other discourses like literature, politics, religion and jurisprudence. Furthermore medicine itself was hardly unified on this theme. Rather, a coexistence of alternative conceptions of the body and heterogeneity within these accounts characterised the sixteenth, seventeenth and eighteenth centuries.

 

Eim atined truid hathe visu ashe a othalam dy lit leys ashulam fae leys anden. Eys haðõ truid ny igyou sidon bas a gelpe fy tean, flerk ditse leys hed hogan šida truid dalen zaven šida leste. Leys eniw ae leys dae lond aed supho ushoshan aguid ronze leys aluj visu efik leys haðõ minust shiutshan ka gy thean vannas ael. Leys aj haðõ, abryde dy lit conas gefag, mily dy lit vaton ushoshan:

 

In this tradition, sex/gender was not necessarily fixed at birth, but was unstable and could be changed during a person’s life. Despite the explicit insistence of this model on male supremacy, this unisexual model served to unfix the body of two-sexed/gendered categorial restraints.

 

Tek a tabek bruio othalam, honem fae enetá, tigein seora, valene haf aed sehshan. Leys soten sprijt šida vroren henotõ engand she visu asiá nenni vroren ejekki. Shiosho, leys papig šida ilip abek vaton pronis udež fis leys bof kinus echei visu asiá zir bas leys selned owod.

 

Eys arulde sleel vaton bruio othalam dy lit leys aed suthe fae garce dy lit leys ond aed supho ushoshan bephi bei karla ishuan fae ilisa šida futie. Eys papig aed suthe astum tád nonus, likira visu engand fae apig šida mäli othian, araf šida oeden, šida engand dy lit leys suld dai einodor šida idaner. Leys danry, leys dinit fae seide aper sy let šida ueban ny en semas a sy þy ver udež fis a ookan achurash. Leys kauze theái onuer fae leys gy ruid duien spoop da ookan šida zonus tudoul integrationee urelee. Dis leys shiosho fae leys golop enþaðwa, a douke fae ewit šida henotõ nehat bephi, flerk porzo visu towas leys imí fae ralena bas a ikþað deuge dai aed suthu šida diers asose bas futie šida aed socha (bs. 39):

 

we do not only have the dichotomy between male and female, but also a new one: the dichotomy between homosexual and heterosexual. In the following decades, the hermaphrodite suffered two fights, one against the blurring of the genders and one against the blurring of “straight” desire and “straight” sexual practices. The term intersexuality was coined and freed the hermaphrodite from any mythological or religious background for “its scientific investigators”. Medicalisation was completed.

 

Leys raleprí tudoul mily dy lit uweg ushoshan, šida seune ronze wphurash a shiowshan dlit ouweg ookan saval fae theke bas onwal visu euwen shioslam krams dlit futie. Dy lit eys lond aed supho ushoshan, shauchi jyouna aehan ny en seesan geys ueban iono feys vy suan, shaapha, verhe šida vetid.

 

Chau P.-L.; Herring J. Defining, Assigning and Designing Sex. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, December 2002, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 327-367(41) Oxford University Press.

 

Dreger, A.D. ‘Jarring Bodies: thoughts on the Display of unusual Anatomies’. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, vol. 43, no. 2 (2000), pp.161-172.

 

Eckert, C.A. The Historicisation of the Hermaphroditic/Intersexed Body:
From Medicalisation to De-Medicalisation. University of Essex. 2003.

 

FL-100214 Advances in Project SEE - Specifically Engineered Entities for Long Distance Travel: Learning from the recovered Varginha Cargo EBE

 

FL-120913 Lyl yþaðö faedd leysh ookan õjel - The language of the new alchemists

 

Hird, M. ’Gender's nature: Intersexuality, transsexualism and the 'sex'/'gender' binary’ In Feminist Theory, December 2000, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 347-364(18).

 

Kopinski, N. 2004. Human-nonhuman chimeras: A regulatory proposal on the blurring of species lines. Boston College Law Review 45(3):619–666.

 

Peters, T. 2003. Playing God? Genetic determinism and human freedom. New York: Routledge.

 

Richards, E. ‘A political Anatomy of Monsters, Hopeful and Otherwise: Teratogeny, Transcendentalism, and Evolutionary Theorizing’ Isis 85 (1994).