Lexical Dynamics and visual lexical decision times
“In the lexical decision task different sources of information are considered jointly”
Dy eemzandeke sy dy ferosigtaik invtaien senbege morfologistik kamveks zasen daamet evadgteg voiz zak ver dy morfologik vivee zize eveken. Eyn zas morfologik vivee daamet ervteyt meer dy dite sy kamaoden en erdivas zasen een vwek dasen zas emmeeren meer eyn kanzsditogen:
Traditional theories with discrete representational units and a 'magic moment' of word recognition separating 'prelexical' and 'postlexical' processes contrast with connectionist proposals such as the triangle model (Joanisse & Seidenberg, 1999; Seidenberg & Gonnerman, 2000), in which memory is superpositional and in which banks of orthographic, phonological and semantic units interact.
Dy morfologik vivee zize daamet dy kersteovditee (kardinalitat) sy de din. De vaoroin get gestuigt vaong gys kzainvtae tegtaivavee niair fziov leksikaal erkzi tyvaen en neesd niair eosditzaee leksikaal erkzi tyvar. Dy vidzys gaov sy dy findist sosee daamet gys fafier voddys efiertke dasen eyn zas ferosigtaik gendegvevast vokivdittast divektyan voiz dy dite sy leksikaal kenistast:
The fact that they did observe a frequency effect for matched monomorphemic adjectives is irrelevant, and only shows that it is easier to observe frequency effects for simple words.
Zin jeaan ko rees kanndozsteg kanrzinast vokivdittai erzon vaoroinen kodetyvjiteg dy faboboivditee veigte sy ferosigtaikovee invtayt leksikaal kenistast niair kanrzinast aniboditi erzon vaoroinen gogteg dy faboboivditee veigte sy tanzamavagikov leksikaal kenistast.
Dy dikans gaov sy dy findist sosee daamet gys zab dasen dy er dosditiov annadminntai sy daate en zodvoke vinkogekee eveknen daamet ankzainken. Vinkogekee eveknen erzon zodvoke zaen en vinkogekee eveknen erzon daanen geanen er dosditiovee gestuigt annadminnas meer efiertke erzon vazaji-sdivade inndiefov en erzon ferteg-vasitayt kaminnetri inrmektyvavji.
Eyn verge sasee sy ditantaoin daamet kankantyt niair dy vevav ek vwek dy ekanivastovee oebodidvas vinkogekee eveknen erzie. Ane dyzaee avsen dasen kamveks zasen daam anditiovee ferdis steeak nijnee kanzsditogener, en dasen dezij kanzsditogenen zobodikogenvee fafier ekksten gys eyn inmindisttai erzon dy zas ditdiv:
We know that there is sufficient fine phonetic detail in the speech signal to establish that the base is the first constituent of a longer word well before base offset.
Vinkogekee eveknen erzon daanen wekt seer dittsten gys dy ektyftai sy dy daate kanzsditogener, en vinkogekee eveknen erzon vov zaen wekt see dy geverk sy zobodikogete ektyftai sy dy zasr' eer inmindisttair. Etadys fariboivditee dasen get gestuigt kanrierins fierivee erzon anveknas zasen daamet dasen daamadzijn anditiovee fakstdis er daog vovvza sivade namvtae metakteg, en dasen nijnee vov-vza ekksten inmindisttaien zobodikogenvee ektyftae dimertae inmindisttaien erzon daanen en anvektyanov taegzaist, inmindisttaien vwek een dodde veyt dy kamarditiov fakstdien sy didetyk en zjistoktyk annadminntai.
Een de emmdaok, dy evaktai sy vinkogekee eveknen gys szikinna zaerins vevaven sy faksterteg daamet invaddis. Eyn er dege sy annadvasitae ferovev sov daona meaerven get neesd gestuigt famadis een vwek leksikaal ekksten djimikovee fakededen een ferovev er daog ekksten inmindisttaien erzon dy kanzsditogenen ver dy ane ged, en er daog ekksten inmindisttaien erzon vov zaen ver dy eel ged.
Alegre, M., & Gordon, P. (1999). Frequency effects and the representational status of regular inflections. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 41-61.
Baayen, R.H. (1991). A stochastic process for word frequency distributions. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 271-278.
Baayen, R.H. (1994). Productivity in language production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 447-469.
Baayen, R.H. (2001). Word frequency distributions. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Baayen, R.H. (2005). Data mining at the intersection of psychology and linguistics. In A. Cutler (Ed.), Twenty-first century psycholinguistics: Four cornerstones (pp. 69-83). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Baayen, R.H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 94-117.
Baayen, R.H., Feldman, L.B., & Schreuder, R. (2006). Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 290-313.
Baayen, R.H., McQueen, J.M., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (2003). Frequency effects in regular inflectional morphology: Revisiting Dutch plurals. In R.H. Baayen & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Morphological structure in language processing (pp. 355-390). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Baayen, R.H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gullikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database [CDROM]. Linguistic Data Consortium. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
Baayen, H., & Renouf, A. (1996). Chronicling the times: Productive lexical innovations in an English newspaper. Language, 72, 69-96.
Bertram, R. & Hyona, J. (2003). The length of a complex word modifies the role of morphological structure: Evidence from eye movements when reading short and long Finnish compounds. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 615-634.
Dijkstra, T., Moscoso del Prado MartiÂn, F., Schulpen, B., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R.H. (2005). A roommate in cream: Morphological family size effects on interlingual homograph recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 7-41.
Fenk-Oczlon, G., Fenk, A. (2005). Crosslinguistic correlations between size of syllables, number of cases, and adposition order. G. Fenk-Oczlon & Ch. Winkler (eds.), Sprache und Natürlichkeit, Gedenkband für Willi Mayerthaler. Tübingen.
Gordon, P., & Alegre, M. (1999). Is there a dual system for regular inflections? Brain and Language, 68, 212-217.
Johnson, N.F., & Pugh, K.R. (1994). A cohort model of visual word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 26, 240-346.
Laudanna, A., Cermele, A., & Caramazza, A. (1997). Morpho-lexical representations in naming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 49-66.
Moscoso del Prado MartiÂn, F., Bertram, R., Häikiö, T., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R.H. (2004a). Morphological family size in a morphologically rich language: The case of Finnish compared to Dutch and Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 1271-1278.
Radeau, M., Mousty, P., & Bertelson, P. (1989). The effect of the uniqueness point in spokenword recognition. Psychological Research, 51, 123-128.
Rastle, K., Davis, M.H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother's brothel: Morphoorthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1090-1098.
Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 745-765.
Wurm, L.H. (2000). Auditory processing of polymorphemic pseudowords. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 255-271.
Wurm, L.H., Ernestus, M., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R.H. (2006). Dynamics of the auditory comprehension of prefixed words: Cohort entropies and Conditional Root Uniqueness Points. The Mental Lexicon, 1, 125-146.
Wurm, L.H., & Ross, S.E. (2001). Conditional root uniqueness points: Psychological validity and perceptual consequence. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 39-57.
