Khuburi agali
Bybee-compliant Languages
After having spread to new uses, patterns adapt by reducing phonetically and becoming tighter.
Adšar khephekarši therker ka nyevo rephipen theguri, khuburi doar kia cizhekarši fonetikalar man isipen thalimo.
Ando zhekikerši řašđali ter oksimo kheover ando řačivariic raćhimo prozesi, keturi si ašfavno ka lelar edna šobani maškar duj thočani umimo theguri ter nuniben kheover, keči si vamzjev čizhikerde man fušikerde balo šonekharši theguri nuniben kha 'bamuri' man 'zhikari':
Adaptive sound change is in my view a reaction to the changed role of an expression, when it is trapped in a complex construction, or when the construction of which it is a part expands its territory. It can be seen as a way of restoring the balance between the communicative role of an expression and its form. It follows that “erosion” and “attrition” are not suitable metaphors for this process.
Keturi si sizaloela řolej na protivno ka phenel kodo nyevo daimo refover kheover si zhitekherdaši ando butipen ter sa đařali, kodo si, kodo keturi ugceli ka zhethker oksimo čoburi ter supin theguri. Buvjov te kothe si čořuri edna ceřa eři, rezultata si kodo kiel zhumkkhar, řačivariic eřkederibeni si befikerde man/vaj řagekharde ando lengero oksimo lelar kiele theguri.
Nyevo daimo refover kheover vikhare na gazoj phošker edna raćhimo niphčuri nuniben kha gramatikalizacija, izze keturi applie theguri ka sa evimi ter gabali zukhoř.
Čeđani, nyevo daimo refover kheover khenare ašđin sočuno řašđali ka khelel ando raćhimo prozesi, ando kodo keturi efipen theguri ka uzkani idiosinkrasija (Asimetrija ando gabali Asymmetry in language).
Nyevo daimo refover kheover dagala rogeli ka edna vizmari ando řodni kompleřiti. Naguri kaver fisamno, te nuniben edna kheover vaj agkar ter niben theguri rogeli ka total zučuri ter edna dunđuri gepekarši, kado muciben rezultata ando cušsimo ter dunđuri řodni:
Thus, high frequency items are associated both with “conservative” and “innovative” tendencies in maturation (Bybee, 2001). This means that the high frequency items in a category may come to be differentiated from the rest in two different ways — either passively, by not undergoing a change, or actively, by undergoing it.
Bi dujekarši šobani maškar nyevo daimo man limekharši refover kheover iluri sokekharde, keturi si ašfavno ka čikher arade unyi vidimo theguri. Mazoř, ame mai gecšari kodo zhuikaniben ter refover pholeni khenare verto tačekarde ando mabgno denoi; iben kodo refover kheover si vamzjev kečekharde kroz 'uzkani difuzija' zabkhali kodo edna refover kheover mai gephala appli čukvunoši ka uzkani gissiben theguri, keči šucpsimo theguri keturi kaj evani izharal kodo nyevo daimo kheover muciben gazima arade kha edna limekharši refover kheover.
Lelari, edna nyevo daimo refover kheover keči si čurimo naguri imari vothtari, akhiben phevani, edna kheover ter kvalitat vokali ando řelekherde silaba theguri akhere zafali uzkani man dunđuri tođřeni ando edna binikerde eiben, man thu theguri akker čořuri garimo ka edna limekharši kheover (Phonosemantics Models and Phonaesthemes).
Esuri ando frekvencija mai khelel edna garimo řašđali:
For each of these scales, there is an associated process by which a sign moves from one end to the other. Thus, the first scale, integrity, is associated with the process of attrition, defined as “the gradual loss of semantic and phonological substance”. Herein lies a paradox, in that the highest degree of grammaticalization turns out to entail the total annihilation of the item: when attrition comes to its logical end-point, the item has totally lost both meaning and overt expression.
Niš, keturi đalpsimo akker čemikerde kodo duj kind theguri ter cizhekarši kheover bazhrar na gazoj akker čucvuno ando denoi kodo von kheover oksimo sathšar ter deleli. Adšar sa, kothe si sekjev edna činekharde vethkar ter denoi ka zhethker edna eřkederibeni fonetikali, keturi si uctamno kodo tafikano prozesi đalpsimo vizar kiele theguri ando lena ipali.
Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ball, Philip. 2001. The self-made tapestry: pattern formation in nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barlow, Michael and Kemmer, Suzanne. 2000. Usage-based models of language. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications.
Barnes, Janet. 1996. Autosegments with three-way lexical contrasts in Tuyuca. International Journal of American Linguistics, 62.31–58.
Bybee, Joan. 1994. The grammaticization of zero: asymmetries in tense and aspect systems. In Perspectives on grammaticalization, ed. byWilliam Pagliuca, 235–254. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Bybee, Joan. 2001. Phonology and language use. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, Joan and Hopper, Paul J. 2001. Introduction to Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. In Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, ed. by Joan Bybee and Paul J. Hopper, 1–24. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Bybee, Joan L. and Slobin, Dan I. 1982. Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense. Language, 58.265–289.
Bybee, Joan L. and Dahl, Östen. 1989. The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Studies in Language, 13.51–103.
Bybee, Joan L., Perkins,Revere and Pagliuca,William. 1994. The evolution of grammar.Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
Bybee, Joan L. Ms. Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: the role of frequency.
Curry, Haskell B. 1961. Some logical aspects of grammatical structure. In Structure of language and its mathematical aspects, ed. by Roman Jakobson, 56–68. Providence, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society.
Dyen, Isidore, Kruskal, Joseph B. and Black, Paul. 1992. An Indoeuropean classification: A lexicostatistical experiment. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 82.
Geurts, Bart. 2000. Explaining grammaticalization (the standard way). Linguistics, 38.781–798.
Goddard, Cliff. 2001. Lexico-semantic universals: a critical overview. Linguistic Typology, 5.1–66.
Goertzel, Ben. 1994. Chaotic logic: language, thought, and reality from the perspective of complex systems science. IFSR international series on systems science and engineering, 9. New York: Plenum Press.
Harris, Zellig S. 1951. Methods in structural linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Johansson, Christer. 1997. A view from language: growth of language in individuals and populations. Lund Linguistics Institute Works, 34. Lund: Lund University Press.
Jurafsky, Daniel, Bell, Alan, Gregory, Michelle and Raymond, William D. 2001. Probabilistic relations between words: evidence from reduction in lexical production. In Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, ed. by Joan Bybee and Paul J. Hopper, 229–254. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Keller, Rudi. 1994. On language change: the invisible hand in language. London: Routledge.
Kusters, Wouter and Muysken, Pieter. 2001. The complexities of arguing about complexity. Linguistic Typology, 5.182–185.
Lass, Roger. 1980. On explaining language change. Cambridge studies in linguistics, 27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marcus, Gary F. and Fisher, Simon E. 2003. FOXP2 in focus: what can genes tell us about speech and language? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7.257–262.
McCarthy, John J. 1981. A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology. Linguistic Inquiry, 12.373–418.
Plotkin, Henry C. 1994. The nature of knowledge: concerning adaptations, instinct and the evolution of intelligence. London: Allen Lane.
Timberlake, Alan. 1977. Reanalysis and actualization in syntactic change. In Mechanisms of syntactic change, ed. by Charles N. Li, 141–177. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Vennemann, Theo. 1983. Causality in language change: Theories of linguistic preferences as a basis for linguistic explanations. Folia Linguistica Historica, 6.5–26.
Zipf, George Kingsley. 1935. The psycho-biology of language: an introduction to dynamic philology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
