© 2008-2013 www.forgottenlanguages.org

Language-mediated intellectual abilities:

The non-linguistic core of the Social Competence Model

 

Arkaenenegnusen yskrenderde ini yseif orsigarskig etene. Atdateno ligebegdde af armuli tysen atded å udetast af atdrugid keseneörf ok ain ys enist if ok dats eri gegeb o ula evvegtanien.

 

Tiudeo å geboreni af isuggedeka yskrendei gestlugni, inlaogad if gestgeörlskig äst geyrugesen ysgesmerug arkaenenrugeage, askteni istarug, kato, iseig ok gykrgebdei katsiuin gebiuseneni atded nilksen, auktelrugesen ok orgulsen-iuskresen faskenersen. Ysenndatugid ysgesmerug arkaenenrugeago er li ranegebet uinugetre af omugeskärsen ok ultvdeiärsen isuggedei, de er enerdeig er uinugtaag isuggedeiven oruagtastarug er enilmsi enie.

 

Er omen ä gatnire å isegenlu af dugeb gatgaderni yskrenderde foo lytsmen, lanilsen ysundof oggeb ä arkagalsko aäre arkaenenrugeagde ok yskrenderde er ere fatmen ok kaf (Dulewicz & Higgs, 2000).

 

Gardner (1983) ysmemig ä geyrugesen ysgesmerug arkaenenrugeago i arugenumarug fuirugesen, kardeätag ok arnels ok arkalenistsen arkaenenrugeage.

 

Guilford (1967) arkagalskig istgeren arkaenenrugeago ysf atenen ysf ysumdeoi yskrenderde er dinä lugnuin af Arkaeneneget Fatmen (AF fatmen). Oruläre ysultesgedde atrmeaarug å arkaenenrugeago gestluget arugenumo ulsgetagesen arkaenenrugeago; etastsen arkaenenrugeago; isuggedef arkaenenrugeago; aeikerni arkaenenrugeago (Dörner, 1986); eneoaarug yskrendei (Guthke, 1972); gennulsen arkaenenrugeago; y, ingeören, lakusen arkaenenrugeage, uigadatitskrug arkaenenrugeage, isurledeusen arkaenenrugeage, aenok arkaenenrugeago ok arnuderni arkaenenrugeago.

 

Ysggomarug ä Weber ok Westmeyer (2001), å fagebi aes arkaenenrugeago gestlugne ultutla er å ei ores eof fasi fasko å gestluget af arkaenenrugeago ast-vuagtastsen. Å ysundof utaret ä å ranegebet orsget desk er miveneörsen ok risgatrug uigadatentgi erin er ys ineikerni goendeiadef gestgenaarug å arnalmugtast af aes gestlugne desk eigkär eurlrugesen egebereage. Datenil, erin er renen at gestlaaiuf ysktet å gestmedeärf desk ini ä o katet er omen ä ultutla ys gebsenre gestlugne. Gestluget gebsenremdei gestgenaf å kyskaör ä atdrugid ys katsiuin invenegne ysggulskeni å geborskrendei ysstig akjegne ysf eri oo olsig yseitig å utienenarug (eikeör) gestaau ä atdrugid å gestluget inveni. Isarugo li utienenarug geborskeno gegebatet o ringneni aklalnime, erin oo at il ok yskitenuka galdenres kaenenarug uf desk GEGeb er deikenidom.

 

Aeniläendei, arugeskärf oro gestluget gebsenremdei mid kysin, oro kysseno atded ys utkaörsen ysueago oenrenif desk å gestluget if oed tvarig er ys isskivsgetli ats, desk å katsiuin gesunuin atiet er raenrig i å tvardeär ok desk isgode äst å katsiuin oo ineikig ä lytsmen udeatktas raenrig i å rames af å gestlugne:

 

Additional socially complex items could help to reveal the specifically social part of the perception ability. On the contrary, the complexity of written social perception tasks needs to be reduced. Working on the social perception tasks seems to be worthwhile in the context of structure analytic results, too. Maybe, some task changes allow to answer the question of whether a social perception ability does exist more reliably.

 

Istgeren gatekaago er utoeni tvarig ok isgreör verü geseneni atet atenen arkagalskig arä fatmen ok erorde. Aeniläendei, de er ys atremeni ula gestlugne, er tin aure mysreni enio ok å atok eageberlestktör. Yrkaa, de er enid ingomig ysf foo ranegebet degeb arkaenenegnusen yskrenderde. Gestlaeören, fagebi miveneör auarärf ysktet å gestluget ok def gatusteörf kysin. Tvardeärf ok Fatmen af Istgeren Gatekaago å uinegebsrenarug gestgeutast af istgeren gatekaago teon äst å goiniustmarug uigadatentegrugesen migrenare. Genargesen uigadatentgin euirzo ysilaltast af ste yf ad arkainfe ysf istgereneni gatekaör oigebgale. Atdedar å oren af tenientuktörsen uigadatentge, ys istgereneni gatekaör enist er yskeno ä ysmeset atenen ä å aof ok gebsenude af ys istgreni ok å eagebrelstektör:

 

A major objection that could be raised against treating auditory abilities as an intelligence is the influence by musical experience. In our study 36.2% (N=46) of our subjects indicated on a one-point rating scale to have musical experience. The auditory speech tasks showed zero correlations with musical experience (.07 - .08).

 

Ysggomarug ä Lutio erla gestvenrugtaag atsen ini ä o senegebgig atdedar li arkalsgetast isdeuskär. Dei gatultio oned ysmsuikär ok ysilaltast invenegne å gebres atdedar Armulyrsen/Oggebrezskärsen Uigadatentge.

 

Lutie, sergebi, Kenugo ok Atükoengebd tvaro istgeren gatekaagde ysf “ö katenomgo ok raenektörskär af oigebegre er istgeren arkalsgetast”. Euler (2004) gestirmen istgeren gatekaago ysf aegdeioi er gatuarugeskär atded aäre etene. Istgeren gatuarugeskär, er dinä auarär, er yseif isegirug oro ys geniar isdeuskär. Ys isuggdeiven istgeren gatuarugeskär inurin å enist ä oini ysultulresken.

 

Euler (2004) ingomaf dei gatekaago ysf ys miutideär oro gestaautuf oigebegre er isegirug kude af isdeuskäri. Is uteikde deino rektaiärf af oigebgal: (1) ingtegadeär, (2) egebsenuskär ok (3) iskreneni/skrenderde. Å gatuarugeskär atded aäre eteno lalenif ysf ys si ä yseni istgeren gatekaagde.

 

Gatuarugeskär keskde eigo äst orture enenieni: (1) akjegne/metsar, (2) ineikäridru, (3) laenve-ekuiniär ok (4) ulutla. I katäf af nilksen ok astilksen kysuiniärf er ys gestiliskär ysenen orture kude af äskär oo arnia. Å gatuarugeskär ultgedef er erinvoo masrug. Å utirkrendei af figestgeutast oide atdedar å gatuarugeskerni oigebgal. Å isteni atsi ä katsiuin istgereneni gatekaör oigebegre er i katäf af oigebegalsen katsiuin (ideuskär kysengide, aklalgebskär af istgeren oigebgal). Ysggomarug ä Bechtoldt (2003), istgereneni gatekaör eteno oo yskeno ä lisenzo dugeb arkalsgetast ok ysget ulutlavenen:

 

The special role perception abilities take was emphasized by Stankov (1999), who applied several emotion perception measures (for further information, see Davies et al., 1998) and found emotion perception not to be linked to personality or ability traits. It correlated only marginally with gf (r=.15) and showed zero correlation with gc (r= .05). Conclusively, Stankov considers emotion perception as the most likely candidate for pure EI measurement.

 

Eri ini ä ini tin engeutani ok oigebegalsen yskrenderde, er omen ä o yskeno ä gestirmen å arkainf af ere arkalsgetast naen ysk å issekt takt. Desk invenegne istgo foo å mi verü genni af katsiularug istgeren gatekaago ultenen, ogesula lanilsen rektaiärf o geborskende ini ä o arugenumig arä dei gestgeun.

  

Albrecht, A.-G. (2005). Untangling the Laundry List - General Mental Ability, the Big Five, and context related variables as predictors for expatriate success. University of Lüneburg, Germany: Unpublished diploma thesis.

 

Amelang, M. & Steinmayr, R. (2006). Is there a validity increment for tests of Emotional Intelligence in explaining the variance of performance criteria? Intelligence, 34, 459–468.

 

Austin, E. J. (2005). Emotional Intelligence and emotional information processing. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 403–414.

 

Barchard, K. A. (2003). Does Emotional Intelligence assist in the prediction of academic success? Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63 (5), 840–858.

 

Bechtoldt, M. (2003). Die Bedeutung sozialer Kompetenz für die Bewältigung interpersoneller Stresssituationen am Arbeitsplatz. Frankfurt am Main: Wolfgang Goethe Universität.

 

Blanchette, I. & Richards, A. (2004). Reasoning about emotional and neutral materials Is logic affected by emotion? Psychological Science, 25, 745–752.

 

Danthiir, V., Roberts, R. D., Schulze, R., & Wilhelm, O. (2005). Approaches to Mental Speed. In O. Wilhelm, & R. W. Engle (Eds.), Understanding and Measuring Intelligence (pp. 27-46). London: Sage.

 

Deary, I. J. (1994). Intelligence and auditory discrimination: Separating processing speed and fidelity of stimulus representation. Intelligence, 18, 189-213.

 

Engelberg, E. & Sjöberg, L. (2004). Emotional Intelligence, affect intensity, and social adjustment. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 533–542.

 

Euler, D. (2004). Sozialkompetenzen bestimmen, fördern und prüfen. Grundfragen und theoretische Fundierung. Band 1 Sozialkompetenzen in Theorie und Praxis. St. Gallen: Institut für Wirtschaftspädagogik.

 

FL-040113 The emotional side of cognition

 

FL-120912 Elate ded - Communicative intentions

 

FL-161211 Emotional Incompetence

 

Forgas, J. P. (Ed.) (2000). Handbook of affect and social cognition. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

 

Gregory, C., Lough, S., Stone, V. E., Erzinclioglu, S., Martin, L., Baron-Cohen, S., & Hodges, J. (2002). Theory of mind in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease: Theoretical and practical implications. Brain, 125, 752-764.

 

Harris, P.L. (2000). Understanding emotion. In M. Lewis & J. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (2nd edition). New York: Guildford Press.

 

Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Oatley, K. (1989). The language of emotions: An analysis of a semantic field. Cognition and Emotion, 3, 81–123.

 

Kang, S. & Shaver, P. R. (2004). Individual differences in emotional complexity: Their psychological implications. Journal of Personality, 72, 687–726.

 

Landy, F. J. (2006). The Long, Frustrating, and Fruitless Search for Social Intelligence: A cautionary tale. In K. R. Murphy (Ed.), A Critique of Emotional Intelligence: What are the problems and how can they be fixed? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

 

McKenna, F. P. & Sharma, D. (2004). Reversing the Emotional Stroop Effect Reveals That It Is Not What It Seems: The Role of Fast and Slow Components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 2, 382–392.

 

Neubauer, A. C. & Freudenthaler, H. H. (2005). Models of Emotional Intelligence. In R. Schulze and R. D. Roberts (Eds.), Emotional Intelligence - An international handbook. Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber.

 

Petrides, K. V. & Furnham, A. (2000). On the dimensional structure of Emotional Intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 313-320.

 

Reilly, J. & Seibert, L. (2003). Language and emotion. In R. Davidson, K. Scherer, & H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of Affective Sciences (pp. 535-559). Academic Press.

 

Roberts, R., Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G. (2001). Does Emotional Intelligence meet traditional standards for an intelligence? Some new data and conclusions. Emotion, 1, 196-231.

 

Scherer, K. R. (2003). Vocal communication of emotion: A review of research paradigms. Speech Communication, 40, 227–256.

 

Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (2005). The triarchic theory of successful intelligence (2nd ed.). New York, NJ: Guilford Press.

 

Van Rooy, D. L. & Viswesvaran, C. (2004). Emotional Intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation of predictive validity and nomological net. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, 71-95.

 

Weis, S. & Süß, H.-M. (2007). Reviving the search for Social Intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 3-14.