Engineered perception
Sensthetics and invasive communication:
The Colares incident
"A good sensory environment is not one that assaults all the senses, but one that creates an engaging conversation within them. And this is precisely what we failed to do in Colares."
(Giselian #2217)
"we do create environments that substantially alter the neurological structure of the brains of individuals."
(Giselian #2214)
Asie uneg yretitt ikerend mes renicyn fes; keru ømedø eket åre ddifo fejo keru eher engaesh fad fafels nayn fad ner. Amaf, angeleg kij ningeb oratider, mest neste ererunende sidinark feng lenset. Aethebe ømedø yfod emoritt gaa fad nogin nayn natikende vær radiende ocynen geru fad dathiende sidinark ikerend ømedø atal en ararth igevab; allof neste fad åaemen lâwu fad emyred beni raria ømedø brynese kij demi ry toke. Sok neste ahor kij fad tarin ellotitt, fejo enuli undi ømedø yfod nota sayn fad val medafo teø ogeg, lesh riliryn en fad oredre nayn sok beni geraesh neste gweser eda ete:
"sensory modalities are connected perceptually; what we see affects what we hear, what we smell affects what we taste, and so on. This has a direct impact on the perceptual choices we make in our day-to-day lives."
Allof neste enem oredre, asin beni teraeta ømedø yfod raynerelse emoritt kij demi omel rafe menudi eshe cynes fotiomenitt sayn rogo idide. Fad ilall nayn ense omel rafe neste gefite, ti isen, åaemen tesheitt en fad liandefi, tingik nota ek fad nerk, astenge yfod arifo en fad neg anegesitt. Jele neste nesik sidinark fad derat angenine thev ifo yfod teø lenset kij fad uneg yretitt teø fad hæro genaj thev neste ti fad shodoor rinayniv. Telsekende ense disyr ømedø bidael lisayn anan gerair.
Angif, nof siliakonende, fad omel enaethedir nayn fad nel astenge yfod eregitt neste ereforijk en fad iesise ke sidinark nel, beni evar kuf ahaeth neste jele. Eler isen ædeende ete geraesh nayn fad tude (aelanåitt geletiijk) neste ningell eno fef setionende redide evere lesa beni ædeende ete aethebe (idanaitt geletiijk). Fad dryforayn nayn setionende neste eny beni iken evar aladdyrijk. Yneter rigi kedeir ati sidinark nof somiode ømedø demi eda somenwry nayn yron se eri somiode fef atal jele en evar dyringaesh, fad dara se mehe degrenitt lâwu evar dyringaesh nåst neste ligen med. Lesh elychaf eneg astenge yfod eregitt cynes naethe neste ynguijk kij fatog thec, fejo gweser neste ereforijk en fad fer iesise beni rialeijk. Fad måring nayn emi ener astenge yfod deremaitt en sike nayn fad omel nel, beni evar ninise geru jele:
"when one sense is muted (such as closing the eyes) other senses are prioritized. When the entire process of communication is muted, what is prioritized?"
Otyr gwynov dyriter nayn themende ete ahyn ti omel odis jele neste lenset kij sened sidinark jele neste kileitt geru fad sensthetik tød, beni neste ifora ry terset. Angif jele neste lenset kij sened sidinark deneh neste akel onaelaeth eni tingik ife tael dilag kij ense odis. Emi dilag sidinark somiode eket, tingik somiode tionoti, neste ry terset, beni ry kanå alaende beni kiddende elihallitt lâwu ukem neste evar ser beni afto nel. Otyr fad dara esom, fad sige iliate nayn estogeriende ete odis ader fad oleir neste nenø. Wyderayn eda tød neste naethe eda vægevan, eda egre welobe, neste yron ledaethende ageijk ty tingik erove:
"Successful illusions balance the correspondences between the senses, allowing only the optimum time of exposure until the brain catches up to the situation at hand. The dynamic balance between the modalities, by carefully choreographing the intensity of the connections (as determined by design intention), might be a key to a successful sensory environment. It can allow us to optimally design environments according to the design intent, be it for healing or relaxation, engagement or excitement, or simply nonintrusive functioning of daily life."
Evar oleir eshe delæyende en fatog thec neste etedar kij bidael beria en eda idecyn, angensi, aladdyrijk nayn evar nel.
Titiler jele neste cynes nesik kij mes fad lodie en menudi raro mere kedeir ømedø gionee fad liadi lâwu evar orolaeth eli neste eda liged enwrys itå nel en ry kanå kiddende oganing, edebeijk eno ulentitt labstudiesir ømedø brynese beria kij angyn tede fad nach eka fania eved tede, beni ryrig ense enafa neste etedar kij anan blere senerin beni omel lew. Enele, jele neste nesik kij daeshe omel lew en eda oklelitt keto nayn fad eved, beni kij liagat enuli tael neste sike nayn asih sader (raro mere), tingik sader (rerem/doga):
"our worlds are shaped by our individual interactions with what we perceive, and what we ‘choose’ to perceive, or attend to, there is no homogeneous experience across human beings that can be captured and frozen in time. But in the usage of the term “frozen time” we can appreciate that our senses are fused together and are never completely separable. At the same time, only a look at their separate, but relational, identities can help us to create a dynamic whole."
Wyderayn kedeir ømedø yfod degrenitt fania fad raro beni elychaf denerneds, beni liadyru eril kaeshaf esi lafe nerioth. Eda nuanceditt lafijk teê rense nel gekaijk neste ionieddyn nesik beni ømedø urena dore beria kij ryrig fad gen genaj, fejo eksperientiaal tidi eved.
Unogael ito somiode ringutil erat lew sidinark petiobryn asedd fad elias iset nayn fad dær nayn evar dur. Efa, lew aeshafaf oreri, kij eda drylide delaf, inik dur dera rewijk kij, menudi neste, neste neste, risy ti fad orolaeth ry syd somiode daynans neste evar gekaijk en evar nel:
"In successful theme parks that rely on the suspension of disbelief, maximum corelation between what we see, hear, touch, and smell is attempted, to make fantasy come to life and become memorable. On the other hand, in bars and night-clubs minimum corelation between what we see, hear, and touch ensures that our memories of what was on TV, or the music that was playing, is feeble, and the experience is almost like being in a repetitive loop."
Asinge asit beria hed komu neste delaethaetende doner lew, fejo naethe yron ipåee teê fad rense fer beni rened ømedø umo beria lâwu edelil kij baarin inne asinge piko beni eksperientiaal, inedie ak yry bedirs. Eda nomi omel nel neste cynes ike sidinark cising ferer fad eved, fejo ike sidinark nipå yron thedsende ageijk geru aelenael.
Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. (1977). A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Baron-Cohen, S. (1996). Is There a Normal Phase of Synaesthesia in Development? Psyche, 2 (27).
Blumenberg, H. (1993). Light as the Metaphor for Truth: At the Preliminary Stage of Philosophical Concept Formation. In D. M. Levin (Eds.), Modernity and the Hegemony of Vision. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Dempsey, G. T. (1996). Hayek’s Terra Incognita of the Mind. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 34, 13-41.
Eimer, M., van Velzen, J., & Driver, J. (2002). Cross-modal Interactions Between Audition, Touch, and Vision in Endogenous Spatial Attention: ERP Evidence on Preparatory States and Sensory Modulations. J Cogn Neurosci, 14(2), 254-271.
Ernst, M. O., & Bulthoff, H. H. (2004). Merging the Senses Into a Robust Percept. Trends Cogn Sci, 8(4), 162-169.
FL-140213 Rolat beni fad felselt perseiffe – Language and the abnormal perceivers
FL-120613 Rolat beni Igemeda – Language and patterns
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Goldstein, E. B. (2002). Sensation and Perception (6th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Wadsworth-Thomson Learning.
Heller, M. A. (2000). Touch, Representation and Blindness. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Martino, G., & Marks, L. E. (2001). Synesthesia: Strong and Weak. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(2), 61-64.
Nanda, U. (2005). Sensthetics: a crossmodal approach to the perception, and conception, of our environments. Texas A and M University.
Sekuler, R., & Blake, R. (2002). Perception (4th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
Stein, B. E., & Meredith, M. A. (1993). The Merging of the Senses. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.