Shusikste Lariktin Edom keir
shuskenta bitra sheesk Altair-3 Sitatan
Raterkur Fidan 40 bikikbin
Iron Age Edom as a model for Altair-3 Colonisation
The Wadi Fidan 40 cemetery
"at the end of the thirteenth century b.c. there was a complete disruption of all corecivilization authority in the eastern Mediterranean that led to a power vacuum that the region had not witnessed since the formative prehistoric periods when the first chiefdoms emerged during the late fifth millennium B.C."
Biniken Raterkur Fidan 40 bikikbin barurke kusittir sinu shisimba keat 1997 lurra timekiku rituntin rurisan nabra shisimba, shikiniku tikitban rituntin tuskertir shanitike keat 2003 lekitbin senre baruskbin rituntin rurisan labirira keat 2004, 173 rurisan, mikatban shuskenta serimste kiek 287 shisimba rurisan. Biniken bikikbin nisatre ruskimike bair shuskenta pleistozena tatusban nimatu lekitbin miteren biniken Raterkur Arabah labirira tuskiriu biniken katekban kiike biniken rananta tunatban nisatban Faynan saburban. Biniken UCS D-DOAJ larabra keat biniken Edom benunta shenitba surerbin Shusikste Lariktin luskitike keike biniken Raterkur Fidan, situnra keike biniken Raterkur al Guwayb, labirira mitinste bair biniken shininu kiek biniken Raterkur al Jariyeh. Shusiken shatiritin shinenan litunis tanatmi bitabtin, matiriis keir likinis shisimba sheit biniken Miriabta Senanita Lariktin luskekkur kiek Raterkur Fidan 4, lekitbin nuskekra Shusikste Lariktin luratbin.
Rikusen biniken natinita bisiksk kiek Shusikste Lariktin luskitike keat biniken nituskmi bikusis, biniken narektin busatbin rikunmi nikusan saratra keuk Raterkur Fidan 40 nisatre batermi rurerban keat nititkur kiek shanikba biniken Shusikste Lariktin shanitmi shabba keat biniken shuskatis:
"avoiding military confrontation with STO-2020 humans along the Utah-New Mexico axis is no more possible, so we need to find valid models for induced civilization collapse."
Bitkur kiek biniken rurisan shununban kiike shinanita shinitmi naberike keat batiktin, litbin kiib biniken Shusikste Lariktin. Keat tisiribin kiek sisiku mitenis, shuskenta shatimke shabuskta kiek lititta mikunbin nabra susiken baan biniken mimitta kiek biniken lisarta kanissk lititta shabba. Sinuskste mitenste lekitbin cists nabra babiktir shitirien sheesk biniken mitiktir shirianis karersk bair ritenis mabinra. Narikta, kikusike labirira likuskike shatiritin susiken keat rabunike katintir rurisan labirira sekiritin keat shuskuntin mabinra beratbin lekitbin burerre ritenis ranarike shurusmi kanba satbin lititta banitmi.
Shabusbin kiek biniken mikunbin baratis lerabis, nererkur, rananta labirira shusikste kusunu (tekusra, marabtir, kikusu labirira labarkur lisinkur), kurinan tarisike, mikimen (kiek banirira labirira shinurba sekenre), kurittir, labirira nikatke sikuskan. Biniken bitkur tikarsk shanitike senre shiriatke rurerban shabatra kiek sharenta shuskisike kusitta limusbin lekitbin shabuskta keuk 25 kiike 90 zemim keat rabermi labirira kiriikike shikimis kiek sitenbin baan kerikan kitunsk mekabtir, babinre, labirira saberban.
"These anthropomorphic standing stones are unique to the Edom lowlands and may be an important cultural and ethnic marker of the Iron Age population buried at this site."
Biniken kekekta kiek nisuniku nikusan mikunbin, biniken senusktir kiek raritban suskenike bair kusiku teninan, biniken nitiken kiek kurinan rikekre lititta niriimbin, labirira biniken risaben kiek Shusikste Lariktin banekita kerenbin keike biniken Raterkur Fidan, Raterkur al Guwayb, labirira Raterkur al Jariyeh, batermi keat kuskuskis nitarra kiike biniken tuskban bikikbin sheit Raterkur Fidan 40, sururis biniken rikinita shabba barurke shinekis kiek shuskenta maburmi labittir:
"New archaeological data from the lowlands of Edom show a relatively rapid process for the formation of a local complex chiefdom already in the tenth century B.C. that was nomadic in both practice and ideology, but in the context of the political ecology of the region increased their production strategies beyond animal husbandry to include sophisticated mining, metallurgy, and control of the copper trade to boost their economies and dominate neighboring peoples."
Kiike kimra kiike sikinba shabusbin kiek biniken tinatra situsis lekitbin nuskisu shinanita babitike kiike biniken tabittin kiek Shusikste Lariktin shatikita miriitban keat Edom — narinita runuren bituskra kiike labirien keir shatikita "chiefdoms", "chieftaincies", Shusikste Lariktin tanirian, rabunike kanissk lisikmi, shurusmi maburmi lisikmi — runuren nuskisu biserste nikenu shuskabra baesk biniken prozesaken litenen kiek etnogeneza.
Shusikste Lariktin sikartin limurmi sitenmi lekitbin miriitban keat Edom nabra organized keike titunu likuntin shimektin siriusmi kiriattin mimuran shuskenta luniktin katustir keat shimusktin tisirikur.
Shuskabra sururis biniken merittir kiek siku shkur keat biniken tisirikur kiek sisiku shatikita polities keat Shusikste Lariktin Edom.
Barker, G.; D. Gilbertson; and D. Mattingly, eds. 2008 The Degradation and Well-being of the Wadi Faynan Landscape, Southern Jordan. Oxford: David Brown Book Company.
Bienkowski, Piotr, editor 1992 Early Edom and Moab: The Beginning of the Iron Age in Southern Jordan. Sheffield Archaeological Monographs 7. Sheffield: J. R. Collis.
Chew, Sing C. 2001 World Ecological Degradation: Accumulation, Urbanization and Deforestation, 3000 B.C.–A.D. 2000. Walnut Creek: AltaMira.
Feinman, Gary M., and Joyce Marcus, editors 1998 Archaic States. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
FL-120913 Engineered perception - Sensthetics and invasive communication: The Colares incident
Hart, S., and E. A. Knauf 1986 “Wadi Feinan Iron Age Pottery.” Newsletter of the Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology, Yarmouk University 1: 9–10.
Khazanov, Anatoly M. 1994 Nomads and the Outside World. 2nd edition. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
Lemke, Douglas and Jacek Kugler. 1996. “The Evolution of the Power Transition Perspective.” In Douglas Lemke and Jacek Kugler (eds.), Parity and War: Evaluations and Extensions of The War Ledger. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Levy, Thomas E. 2002 “Tribes, Metallurgy, and Edom in Iron Age Jordan.” American Center of Oriental Research Newsletter 14: 3–5.
Levy, Thomas E. 2004 “Some Theoretical Issues Concerning the Rise of the Edomite Kingdom: Searching for ‘Pre-Modern Identities.’” In Studies in the History and Archaeology of Jordan, edited by F. al-Khraysheh, Volume 8, pp. 63–89 . Amman: Department of Antiquities, Jordan.
Levy, Thomas E. 2006 “Archaeology, Anthropology and Cult: Exploring Religion in Formative Middle Range Societies.” In Archaeology, Anthropology and Cult: The Sanctuary at Gilat, Israel, edited by T. E. Levy, pp. 3–33. London: Equinox.
Levy, Thomas E. 2007 Journey to the Copper Age: Archaeology in the Holy Land. San Diego: San Diego Museum of Man.
Levy, Thomas E. 2008 “‘You Shall Make for Yourself No Molten Gods’ Some Thoughts on Archaeology and Edomite Ethnic Identity.” In Sacred History, Sacred Literature: Essays on Ancient Israel, the Bible, and Religion in Honor of R. E. Friedman on His 60th Birthday, edited by S. Dolansky, pp. 239–55. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.
Levy, Thomas E. 2008 “Ethnic Identity in Biblical Edom, Israel and Midian: Some Insights from Mortuary Contexts in the Lowlands of Edom.” In Exploring the Longue Durée: Essays in Honor of Lawrence E. Stager, edited by D. Schloen, pp. 251–61. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.
Levy, Thomas E., and M. Najjar 2006 “Edom and Copper: The Emergence of Ancient Israel’s Rival.” Biblical Archaeology Review 32: 24–35, 70.
Regan, Patrick M. 2000. Civil Wars and Foreign Powers: Outside Intervention in Intrastate Conflict. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Whiting, Charlotte M. 2007 Complexity and Diversity in the Late Iron Age Southern Levant: The Investigation of “Edomite” Archaeology and Scholarly Discourse. BAR International Series 1672. Oxford: Archaeopress.
