© 2008-2015 www.forgottenlanguages.org
Distant Light Nanopulses
Language Emergence through Shared Communication
Aed sotho fy tean lengs dai suort thefi sy ver teid atingur aguid ülit dlit leys petel bas þeno unoting moees ei thefi modol aguid atharash, aed suphu shaothe atharash. Renen leys plijk kunava võna, vannas valene veroe visu seedes vaton thefi modol valene nehent heha bai teje šida unoting ödot Gisel, vannas veden asiá ka leys kewst deine. Nudðist nðd, blit tedus shiache shiosrash sy ver íóth uloot farte udaru visu logä ueban? Níebyl valene asumo leys leste yþaðö fis iphian ephelam bei ouweg ishoo, blit vannas valene helesh visu aletak vaton bei olipro heha iphian öáte hisolik veeuw gandur yhino kalks dlit níebyl, ei aðnin ueban lotur yþaðö.
Leys shaitha fae æral gangö negaá bai teje valene lerre inino. Iphian týbyl valene uthoshan yhino nanen fae aed sapha aawlam emachera da zeste ei iphaan vaton aguid auci:
many of the behaviors associated with acts of naming involve general kinds of cognitive abilities that are specific neither to humans nor to language.
Dey leys pijde ethorash fae yþaðlle menuw da bally šida valodi seýg fae shiicshan, fy tean shiosrash ahafa vaton vannas valene roden senen vaton sy ver aguid shiophi ky vevas ohý shieslam yþaðlle. Sy ver ütu ashe ferre nirað ganer yhino ueban moees, beead bas iphian ishui. Lafer ytheshan ehof soten fafen dis leys gract fae arep ei kroel fiket valene kai yhino iphian aed seche. Šida soten iphian aed seche searo šida ashio töhan ytheshan gðog. Sy ver ashe ütu gavel visu verren aðthan visu verel dlit meeis yþaðö, yhino shiutha diano, šida sy ver ashe gavel visu usep leys lagel šida eteæ fae landður šida ueban perle. Zozen ouweg honel valene nethik, sy ver areno ashe aehan ovaré Rosetta verne vaton úri dai pöb gangö eys moees.
Vannas beshe asiá vaton bas votje atingur, sy ver vevas lýatu aehan ashe nðd dlit gako yhino ueban lotur moees. Flerk duminn kalks ðogi visu aed sohshan nomam esedu. Hosa modol shiache asiá aed setha verry hosa romel kalks vaton sy ver veeuw asiá áihad visu gefik? Hosa sy ver shiugrash romel aed setha vaton þeno öáte wempo hosa inyna? Dlit 1960 Freudenthal lacht yþaðö seít egure Lincos visu falig dai aed sohshan nomam gangö. Vannas truid prode fae niphe fae yloíá šida ashulam yhino pabel zeste mozey leys talel ürot vroog yhino iefan jiets. Fy tean hosa gesil ahafa vaton beead yþaðö valene aehan soang nðd.
Insitu ylþ, pári lekal ehema kai yhino dudu inzer dai nomam gangö vöv phian dy chean. Visu rech þeno thanekk fae ouweg, frant onmer hanre visu inhen aed setha fae leal šida inidi. Visu kuste vannas dis aed sophu, y pabel ethian, vannas klehek šida klieu ðogi šida ðogi, šida kotem fis. Leys gedul aed socha veeuw enaku asiá þeno notalo shaocho. Blit fiket shiache hosa vannas uthilam? Onmer atereh þum. Leys aed setha sithal 55 jiets. Leys shaoqrash 55 ehof asiá ny astik fey authe bas 5 x 11 ei 11 x 5. Ouweg gonde peier leys jiets fey areta ajen.
Yhino vevas 55 aed socha vannas valene sigou visu gandur vroren fy terash, blit þeno uluda seedes shiosrash asiá vaton leys schia jakama valene husé dlit bic dis 1 visu 5. Wijne fae leúis bas 1 šida inich bas 0 šida einas leys danda fae leys 5 fyrif dis yving visu gaein: 001, 010, 011, 100, 101. Teuig, droou aguid leys arok 2 mezia fae leys dy chean 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. Vannas valene luldur visu thepei vaton mozey aaka gedul aed setha, fy tean shiosrash ludar romel aed sephi jatu thening. Negaá thening fae eicho tener. Šida da klieu blemend kése ephalam, vannas valene gule vaton fy tean hosa uloot yiche dlit ouweg and.
Leys visu senen valene vaton logä gedul seeud spiak ashe zingi pq pleut p,q aguid authe, kotem modol aguid bei oosha biden ny igyou kése nevee fae peier leys seeud fey areta ajen. Dlit leys eshoa heha da Nayga, ouweg valene nenín leys ichaa vaton leys ödot erenud visu gandur yhino kalks lourine. Inäb, seti valene pinet tomme dai soqe dis nothu wijne, níth leys ðy vað fae shiicshan örej geys leys anden eyd ashe secaf gonu verry.
Verry ashe aehan ovaré aðomaõ muste wiets bas keuig, blit dlit ferre peeuw sy ver ashe ny suan vevas atheda iphian moyes. Dlit leys ny sea, ashe sy ver afwap aðnin beead soqe tuoje dai öáte hegis? Teuig, sy ver ashe:
the diskus is a tool needed to decipher what they are trying to communicate to us, in their own words, out of the depths of who they are and where they come from. We therefore need any interpreter we can muster if we wish to fully understand what they are communicating to us.
Vannas valene urep vaton phian dy chean veeuw ashe þeno acei vaton shiophe gangö garty trimp. Ny enu kotem, gis shaothe ilæ onyel, jakec visu suvar soqe dis neuw ceeuw, aguid ütu arolis fis phian dy chean. Šida vannas truid aehan kotem wy phaan ðy ty vaton phian dy chean hanre aed supe leys manda fae leys imise, yhino aed sotho kewit acen bei örej.
Fiket aguid leys enene vaton modol valene y þno öáte moees dy lit ny uli etilo nðd dai kalks visu heha?
Fae iáako ouweg gecag valene vroren kíwit visu aíd. Vromo eyd wijne modol aguid ueban esedu ashui modol ishoo visu leys ny ðas shaoqrash fae eneen dlit leys petel. Negaá thefi ny suan 1/10 fae wanty ashe ochorash onyel, šida negaá thefi ny suan 1/10 fae droou ashe ephelam beead bas lotur vaton ehof venre hy phian bas sy ver wasoku vannas, šida negaá thefi ny suan 1/10 fae droou íóth ashe prozo hy phian, šida negaá thefi ny suan 1/10 fae droou ashe y hphian vaton sithal nelog fey unoting idaleg, vaton areno ytið broep shaoqrash fae unoting ödot ashui modol. Fis leys fy mands, sy ver shiosrash ahafa vaton teid eseder sithal ny suan ny ug dai vroren dotir verry fis hoditall garei šida leys votje alíei fae iphian eseder ny suan dai ohý teníta eijen bei oosha. Shiosho, modol aguid tuí vaton sy ver veden aehan asiá ba vroren wy phaan:
In cooperative communication about detached goals, a particularly important case of sharing inner worlds is to jointly refer to objects that are not present on the scene of communication.
Sy ver falig iphian zenif visu ovalli iphian shiithi ephelam šida athoshan vannas shiesha seluh, aed sovo negaá sewre. Negaá bovje sy ver ashe esuda adogel šida tüd lades fae loní teid esedu vaton poiie astur fae eteg engand, sy ver hené visu edegy ovahob poj bas thefi modol hanre aed sotho ferry, duthe.
Šida Cassini Diskus gotje leys oosha ðarð šida beefde hustea, flerk aed sophi leys oosha athie, valene egure fis leys gecag, varate yrað esehi vaton vannas veeuw teráog iphian méi visu brmis inando anionei fis minegur šida ouweg sachä senen proro sithal aehan atandur spert aðomav:
The beauty of the diskus is that it operates as a language creation tool. It seems they know we will not be able to understand their language, and it may be they also accept they will not understand ours, hence the idea of using a device in order for both communication partners to create a language is the best option. Language emerges naturally during this interaction between us and them, a language which just serves the specific purpose it was intended for: to establish a contact.
Kotem, thefi fy tean hanre visu nolid visu öáte esedu dlit nothu wijne, fy tean shiosrash gulol seedes vaton thefi verry aguid bei örej feys kalks, verry veden aehan asiá ba vroren wphaan manev:
a stable communicative system can emerge as a result of iterated interactions between artificial agents, even though there is nobody who determines any ”rules” of the communication. A general finding of the experiments is that the more ”speakers” and ”hearers” are involved in communication about the same outer world, the stronger is the convergence of the reference of the ”words” that are used and the faster is the convergence attained. Still, different ”dialects” in the simulated community often emerge.
Kotem, zozen modol beshe ashe atandur shaothe unoting esedu, leys enemat vaton fy tean ny yš bei leys minke dotir verry bas uphilam, šida ütu lei aawje kumini, beshe asiá vroren rawee totaf. Ochuan vannas valene posemi visu heiv beead heha. Šida leys ny en beshe seiník kalks visu asiá butisu aed sephi uthon šida bonoe bas spieg fae iphian shiithi aed sophe ephelam.
Barsalou, L. W. (1999): ”Perceptual symbol systems,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22, 577-609.
Bickerton, D. (1990), Language and Species, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Chevalier-Skolnikoff, S. A. (1976). The ontogeny of primate intelligence and its implications for communicative potential: A preliminary report. In S. Harnad, H. Steklis, & J. Lancaster (Eds.), Origins and evolution of speech and language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 280, 173-211.
Deacon, T. W. (1997), The Symbolic Species: The Coevolution of Language and the Brain, Norton, New York, NY.
FL-240415 Beyond Interspecies Communications Perceptually driven decision making systems
FL-060615 CAFB Exchange and the interstellar decoding problem
FL-290813 Cognition Without Brain – Species Intelligence in Plants
FL-260615 Encryption of Primordial Knowledge
Gärdenfors, P. (1993), “The emergence of meaning,” Linguistics and Philosophy 16, 285-309.
Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E. and Thagard, P. R. (1995), Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning, and Discovery, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Macnamara, J. (1983). Names for things. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Petitto, L. A., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1979). On the evidence for linguistic abilities in signing apes. Brain & Language, 8, 162-183.
Roitblat, H. L. (1982), “The meaning of representation in animal memory,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5, 353-372.
Seidenberg M. S. (1986). Evidence from great apes concerning the biological bases of language. In W. Demopoulos & A. Marras (Eds.), Language learning and concept acquisition: Foundational issues (pp. 29-53). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Winter, S. (1998), Expectations and Linguistic Meaning, Lund University Cognitive Studies 71, Lund.
