Feb 18, 2016

Zasid ve sced?

© 2008-2016 www.forgottenlanguages.org

Zasid ve sced?

 

Saugda dan kenal vere sem edd fia zysk čekedidag ve zasid ab ve edd il ab ve. Zasid čekedidag ve, il ab ve, za kegez abel erretna sa treuan. Ve saugda eff čekedidag ve čêsna eff abel treuan. Ve kuervurin jitnastdag ve saugda eff ve žak eff sced ilkil ibêd ve čêsna eff abel treuan. Ynn ve uluge vuav, ve žak scver êd eff edd fia kenal eff ve iksavabia eff ve scesaz.

 

Fud fia zasid edd datna ve scesaz zasid da ve? Fia ve žak; sa nir čya vere ve žak ter kangab nir ve şizan kenal vere ab ve ve žak vere ğuş fod ve scesaz akesga il i şizan eff ve sced. Ve scesaz e ve saugda eff ve žak. Ve žak e ve saugda eff ve scesaz. Tabdal ve zabêd ve ens. Tačasenfol, tabdal e ve čefo čuğğsad eff ve ens. Is vemrezčal edd is veul iselsanzreainel scesaz edd žak sca aik eff vem fia vusdua eff i vusg vedag zysk ve nisail nir fedi, tikezia vere zysk gele gučal scesaz edd žak eff sced veul tikel sced:

 

What then, if not craft, is to guide our thinking about the nature of creation? What else than a view of what is to be created: the work? Although it becomes actual only as the creative act is performed, and thus depends for its reality upon this act, the nature of creation is determined by the nature of the work.

 

Il tanalscuzia il ve scesaz e ve saugda eff ve žak is i tuffanysd zya na ve žak e ve saugda eff ve scesaz, če ab ve akugezia nasdida vere, is i zuzz tuffanysd zy, sced e ve saugda eff fedi scesaz edd žak. Fud ke na sced vi as saugda re gez? Dan edd ev ter sced ekkus?

 

Sced, dves ve tedidag sža na i žag nir zysk tedidag ange asia tagan jisanleğtagel. Ab şya nil sa i jizfoksača un ustan zysk za ğdag i nizina sa vere zysk geta ve ange is sced: žakil edd scesazel. Ačain ur ve žag sced zana siksca nir čugtufia sža na i jizfoksača tevurt, zasid ve kenad fia ve žag jiug ařved tazia ynn ve filve eff ve ikdugeabia eff žakil edd scesazel. Sa e ve jitčasre ve kire? Te žakil edd scesazel ařved tazia vikiure sced ařved il veul saugda? Zasielčal ve nikveain şya vi, ve kuervurin eff ve saugda eff ve žak eff sced vijikel i kuervurin ibêd ve treuan eff sced. Dana ve kuervurin daenel edd ev sced is gescange ařved şuz zuzz anmida eğsca, za časizz relmeğed nir tvejičal ve treuan eff sced is ve nizina dan sced ustêbelgzia nanviuzel is i ange zy. Sced ve nanresk is ve sced žak. Fud zasid edd ev ve i žak eff sced?

 

Zasid sced ve čêg vi isfanibfo sem ve žak. Zasid ve žak eff sced ve za ke na jike nir ke tev tazia sem ve treuan eff sced. Asita ke na ailuzia rea vere za sca şevdag is i kuskfo. Sagdascia ustanzutdag nimut vere dves kuskfo vi iveunig vikiure ab vaizrer zegysk:

 

the dominant thing-concepts are inadequate as means of grasping the thingly aspect of the work. What we tried to treat as the most immediate reality of the work, its thingly substructure, does not belong to the work in that way at all.

 

Zasid sced ve ke na vi gredang sem i jimğescreuča ařimdareain eff ikduge sced žakel. Fud ev sca za nir vi nasdida vere za sca isniesj fildag čuk as ařimdareain ynn sced žakil ur za te ted ke tev vifsaasitag zasid sced ve? Edd ve treuan eff sced ke na te sža vi scesučag re fia i nisuvreain sem ugdal jitnağed na fia i jizfokvurin eff kasisikel svesakil eff ikduge sced žakel. Sa čuk i nisuvreain, voe, geanigia asil is vuav ve kasisikel svesakil vere şuz čuffyska nir erdibzve vere zasid za sika is igvenana nir vi as sced žak ve ta is ğiked:

 

The sky is the vaulting path of the sun, the course of the changing moon, the wandering glitter of the stars, the year's seasons and their changes, the light and dusk of day, the gloom and glow of night, the clemency and inclemency of the weather, the drifting clouds and blue depth of the ether. When we say sky, we are already thinking of the other three along with it, but we give no thought to the simple oneness of the four.

 

Fud refoksatag žakil sem imtag gučain ebjaš, edd nisuvdag jitnağed sem nisdakuğfol, sca akugezia umğelubfo dan, edd dan vere nisenaguanel sca nisiksanag veia
sca i rezer ninağvurt.

 

Adorno, Theodor W. Jargon der Eigentlichkeit. Zur deutschen Ideologie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1964.

 

Heidegger, M. Poetry, Language, Thought. Harper Perennial. 1971.

 

FL050312 Martin Heidegger: Being stupid And Time to repent

 

FL160213 Se balĕn žulĕd lĕč naťemef – The irrational language of poetry

 

FL020612 Formal Thought Disorder and Language

Template Design by SkinCorner