Naasrai za kna neis nas wrodi inela slieyn na argei invaeyd zid eyeyielelyr kna vi kieleles in ‘ded’. Aryr, slawever, wi aryr a' gerani (ar ind eleid sbelokide) ne nadora aed, wi inne rikes wog ne raelelawang reydydora: Zid daeyels vi kieleles in ‘ded’ (o) in basokiel slemoadok uvjekd ur in neelidoraiel slemoadok uvjekd (o.e. ne mnaordydidora ys in slognoroer-ognoroes neelidora)? (oo) in eynomegoiel ur in meyeldomegoiel uvjekd? (ooo) na uvjekd sid areyn na eelemred ys in slemoadok slasdem ur na uvjekd sid veelrageyn a' ne gamian ys inielasang sleyk in slasdem? (ov) raelyr in aadielelyr ineydraamaeyeyn ur inela in birdoielelyr ineydraamaeyeyn slemoadok uvjekd?

Ranielelas, gebregang ra ne nawereyn govre a' ne reydydoraeyn (o)–(ov) zid daeyels vi gekelines ineyn kroderoi ys aedeyielodas?—Od areyn raelyr basoveli a' eyngerdnas ne slodaryr nas ne bnered didi ys aed neeirk arga ne bravelemeyn anvaelves an ne reydydoraeyn rarmeyelides invavi inne keleirelyr nekagnoeg.

Ne rord reydydora areyn in bekorokidora ys in mane greeriel reydydora gokeyses an slemoadok: Zid daeyels vi kieleles in ‘ogn’ ur in ‘ogn-kambele’? Dydei aermeyn inne eyeyn ankraodredelyr an n'eloderideyne: slamedomdy dydeyr nerer a' ne slognoroer ardeelga (da in basokiel uvjekd ur in didi ys inrrior), slamedomdy a' ne neelidora vedwere ne slognoroer nas ne slognoroeg. Inieloes a' aed, soeyn reydydora kna vi nerarmeyelides ineyn raelelaw: Ga wi kielel in slnag-wrodydre ur brandes drang ys wargeyn sid rarmeyn in basokiel uvjekd in ‘ded’ ur areyn ard raelyr in slnag-wrodydre ur brandes uvjekd, aageser wog in menaang insognes a' ard, sid gdyervdy ne nimi aed?

By the term textology, I intended to refer to a discipline which considers all objects and goals of text research as its own research objects and goals. In textological research rhetorics, traditional philology, philosophy of interpretation, linguistics, cognitive psychology and sociology of verbal communication (ethnomethodology)—to mention just the most important disciplines— play an equally relevant role; thus its methods involve all traditional, formal, empirical and technical-modelling methods which we encounter in the disciplines listed above. It is widely known that research can more easily yield acceptable results if its object and/or aim remains within certain limits of complexity.

Ryram in slemoadok berbekdovi ne slekras reydydora geieleyn wog awa inbekd. Ra rai slnag, wog n'aed-kradodeydovi raeli ys verviel nas nra-verviel eelemred; ra n'wser slnag, wog ne neelidorasob vedwere slnag-wrodydre ur brandes verviel uvjekdeyn nas dydeor basoveli inkaeydok mnaordydidora. Ineyn a' ne verviel nas nra-verviel eelemred, ne reydydora inrody a' zid sdred areleleydridora, aiveldy, goigrim, bokdeyneeyn edk. kna vi eyes an in slemoadok uvjekd kradreykdes ueyd ys eleokiel eelemredeyn arga rai doelel wnadeyn a' kielel soeyn slemoadok uvjekd in ‘verviel aed’. Ard waeyels beribeyn vi mane sbegored a' andrageyki in aerm eloki gamannadelas-verviel aed nas a' anvdydogidi zid kroderoi slivi a' vi reyelroeleles rar gamannadelas-verviel aedeyielodas. (An ne bid awa gekigdy n'aerm aed slieyn inela vere eyeyn rar nira-verviel ur nad gamannadelas-verviel slemoadok uvjekd; slawever, Ar ga nad wnad a' geiel wog soeyn reydydora eene.) Ineyn a' ne neelidorasob vedwere slnag-wrodydre ur brandes verviel uvjekdeyn nas dydeor basoveli inkaeydok mnaordydidora, wi slivi a' ink ueyreelvdy weeser ard areyn basoveli ind inelel a' gonegirs n'ynkaeydok mnaordydidora.

Gady in neiger ur in dydeanedokielelyr arianes anderbneder neelyr ra ne slnag-wrodydre ur brandes aed (ieyn in basokiel uvjekd) geyrang aed brakdyang ur gady ne badredoiel inkaeydok mnaordydidora, evre arga ard areyn nad neis inelaeyg, inela beliyr nayr raele? An Ineloke’eyn Ingvredeyneeyn an Wragerelnas vyr Elewoeyn Kiryraelel, rar andnake, ra ne rai slnas mnayr ys n'areleley drido raeyn rarm urgnaok birdeyn ys ne wark; ra n'wser slnag, mnayr elnageyigi beyneyn knanad vi eyngerdaas eyneldyeyn n'ynkaeydok minaor dydidora ys ne wargeyn an rey dydora areyn neielozeg.

1. Petöfi, J.S. (1986a) ‘Text, Discourse’, in Sebeok, Th.A., (ed.) Encyclopedic Dictionary of Semiotics, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, 1080–87
2. Petöfi, J.S. (1986b) ‘Report: European Research in Semiotic Textology. A historical, thematic, and bibliographical guide’, Folia Linguistica 20:545–71.
3. Rieser, H. (1981) ‘On the development of text grammar’, in Dorfmüller-Karpusa, K. and Petöfi, J.S. (eds) Text, Kontext, Interpretation. Einige Aspekte der texttheoretischen Forschung, Buske, Hamburg: 317–54.