Oct 3, 2010

Wezewo lì tian tí


Wezewo lì tian tí


Tian tí xiân wezewo. Yowbexi tian tí hawlabua dê luxuxtie wezewo hâ
yí fxi huxi fabxi mahexi hâ taxfoxehxi hâ xohoxi lahlèa huxi lezuze hâ.


Wuxi thi hâ fông bo-ma-ni luxuxtie wezewo hâ hawolabua dê lifyikxi yowbexi tian tí  fông de-ti-lo-ki dê wuxi yexi dê lé shaò. Wekoe hâ lì timamemae huxi fông cha hâ lì fông ha-bi-se-le weyzazea wixi dê wuxi hixoxi kufyawatoa buziliwiboxi hâ.


Shû 554 tê hâ huxi mewoxi hâ wuxi laì leá PDF huxi OPF mixi hâ.




  • AUROUX, Sylvani, et al., eds. History of the Language Sciences: An International Handbook on the Evolution of the Study of Language from the Beginnings to the Present. Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 18. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2000.


  • BAO Zhiming. “Language and World View in Ancient China.” PEW 40.2 (1990): 195-219.


  • BARNES, Archie. Chinese through Poetry: An Introduction to the Language and Imagery of Traditional Verse. N.p.: Alcuin Academics, 2007.


  • BAXTER, William H., [III]. “Situating the Language of the Lao-tzu: The Probable Date of the Tao-te-ching.” In Kohn and LaFargue, 231-53.


  • BEHR, Wolfgang. “Language Change in Premodern China—Notes on Its Perception and Its Impact on the Idea of a ‘Constant Way.’” In Schmidt-Glintzer et al., 13-51.


  • BELLWOOD, Peter. “Examining the Farming/Language Dispersal Hypothesis in the East Asian Context.” In Sagart et al., 17-30.


  • BOLTZ, William G., and Michael C. Shapiro, eds. Studies in the Historical Phonology of Asian Languages. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 77. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1991.


  • CHEN, Chi-yun. “Chinese Language and Truth—A Critique of Chad Hansen’s Analysis.” CC 31.2 (1990): 53-80.


  • CHEN, Kuang Yu. “Zhui Wang in Oracle Bone Language: Possible Relationship to the Bird Totem of Shang Dynasty (1700-1100 BC).” JCL 22 (1994): 101-13.


  • CHENG Chung-ying. “Logic and Language in Chinese Philosophy.” JCP 14.3 (1987):285-307.


  • FAJCSÁK, Györgyi. “The Historiography of Chinese Art in Hungary.” AO(B) 56.2-4 (2003): 429-42.



  • GENTZ, Joachim. Das Gongyang zhuan: Auslegung und Kanonisierung der Frühlingsund Herbstannalen (Chunqiu). Opera Sinologica 12. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2001.


  • GENTZ, Joachim. “Language of Heaven, Exegetical Skepticism, and the Re-Insertion of Religious Concepts in the Gongyang Tradition.” In Lagerwey and Kalinowski, II, 813-38.


  • HARBSMEIER, Christoph. Language and Logic in Traditional China. Ed. Kenneth Robinson. Science and Civilisation in China, vol. VII, Part 1. Ed. Joseph Needham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.


  • HONEY, David B. “The Word Behind the Graph: Three Notes on the Logographic Nature of Classical Chinese.” Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 24 (1989): 15-26.


  • LEE, Lily [Xiao Hong]. “Language and Self-Estimation: The Case of Wei-Jin Women.” JOSA 25-26 (1993-94): 15-64.


  • LURIE, David B. “Language, Writing, and Disciplinarity in the Critique of the ‘Ideographic Myth’: Some Proleptical Remarks.” Language and Communication 26.3-4 (2006): 250-69.


  • MOU, Bo. “The Structure of the Chinese Language and Ontological Insights: A Collective-Noun Hypothesis.” PEW 49.1 (1999): 45-62.


  • MOU, Bo. “Ultimate Concern and Language Engagement: A Reexamination of the Opening Message of the Dao-De-Jing.” JCP 27.4 (2000): 429-39. Reprinted as “Eternal Dao, Constant Name, and Language Engagement: On the Opening Message of the Dao-De-Jing” in Bo Mou, Comparative Approaches to Chinese Philosophy, 245-62.


  • SUN, Zhenbin. “Yan: A Dimension of Praxis and Its Philosophical Implications (A Chinese Perspective on Language.” JCP 24.2 (1997): 191-208.


  • THURGOOD, Graham, and Randy J. LaPolla, eds. The Sino-Tibetan Languages. Routledge Language Family Series. London and New York, 2003.


  • TONG, Lik Kuen. “The Meaning of Philosophical Silence: Some Reflections on the Use of Language in Chinese Thought.” JCP 3.2 (1976): 169-83.


  • TONG, Lik Kuen. “The Appropriation of Significance: The Concept of Kang-Tung in the I Ching.” JCP 17.3 (1990): 315-44.


  • TONG, Lik Kuen. “The Way of Care: The Image of the Moral Guardian in Confucian Philosophy.” In Hsüeh-li Cheng, ed., 197-209.


  • VIERHELLER, Ernstjoachim. “Object Language and Meta-Language in the Gongsunlong-zi.” JCP 20.2 (1993): 181-210.


  • VOVIN, Alexander. “Did the Xiongnu Speak a Yeniseian Language?” CAJ 44.1 (2000):87-104.


  • WADE, Geoff. The Polity of Yelang (夜郎) and the Origins of the Name “China.” SPP 188 (2009).


  • WANG, William S-Y. “Language in China: A Chapter in the History of Linguistics.” JCL 17.2 (1989): 183-222.


  • WANG, William S-Y. “Genes, Dates, and the Writing System.” IRCL 1.1 (1996): 45-46.


  • WANG, William S-Y., ed. The Ancestry of the Chinese Language. Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 8. N.p., 1995.


  • WANG Yü-ch’üan. Early Chinese Coinage. Numismatic Notes and Monographs 122. New York: American Numismatic Society, 1951.


  • WANG Yuxin. “Once Again on the New Period of Western Zhou Oracle-Bone Research: With a Brief Description of the Zhouyuan Sacrifice Inscriptions.” EC 11-12 (1985-87): 164-72.
Template Design by SkinCorner