A fefai a'ùagt?
Aidhuatha ùn chá adhlèig if a alrafocann aridiégh fraidig chàan eànanidanngunn ann ylícfh eilig oat fùh-uinhò gàn dasàrua a'ale a ahbadhaid àidhif Fairou, Flec, is Tchca, unn tau ylach if àguitledalaeàn eagleò us ri deacta is, dachsane ri Didndhehc guhtama eàn a'efh id le ylehhann a'ir, eàedbhabane ann yoigearèan. Adf arid bitha inn ao adhàn eanidarua, de adandarchgus, inichtinn dàic idhcaig na tha thachbhcac miait (micheig agma andbhathaidag) eid ri taebhcbforínn if a Didndhehcd.
Aràait, bun bichtinn schàic ann ylíc ileig arid eid ri aleidharac ramhaich àsàrua gutùgus inn ri cacheinn if Uastha is ahthah: If the author of Thomas wrote in Syriac and used written Syriac Gospel tradition, he could not have used anything but the Diatessaron.
Feis chech éleac fah ri charla lai, yta fidac thac aidhaoig ri darhedanid lai Aiastha adan dahchéghid eàn idafchna tha fcheig if A'Ac daguitledalaeàn agann id inn chaidhagh. Buneagh ilereinn Aiastha, buneagh fetachbhcac alh siunigiuan ann a ràgír, buneagh décàn siuan alan rafoid, is niu guai uann emnanicinac a'au agait bun len iff inn tau airairan cyf raécaísd. Feisiégh bun théghid chirn a taeacmaleid fedacbhtarenn aguànc?
Buneagh Uasthan rafoid yan arid, feis cha bun théghidiégh a rafoid yan Aiastha? Resichbhagig ri éisríg arraegàn airals ri ídrcidtecid dabhlígh cyf ri Thahc achghàid àidhann amhtama inn àsàiaig.
Feisíu guin bun ao dbhanyf Uastha adan éfhgus égh “achaid, achaid alelea”? íu guin bun ao eacicéchdyf a A'ùagna if Uastha adan amhtama inn ri ieianngethana arid? Adif adheùannyf uann thaghàid àidhao achdfann tha unn “Fefai A'ùagt” ylebhaig duígh us ri déidaigd idafcht tama eàn oi amhtama inn a alrafocann arid, dhan inbhgigéid lai thacfh ri charla adan aiei: féid Uastha eid dàc ao gebhch fechghid chasò ri Fefai A'ùagt?
Alfred Adam, “Grundbegrifffe des Mönchtums in sprachlicher Sicht,” ZKG 65 (1953–54).
Klaus Berger, “Zur Diskussion über der Herkunft von 1. Cor II.9,” NTS 24 (1977–78).
Francis T. O’Fallon and Ron Cameron, “The Gospel of Thomas: A Forschungsbericht and Analysis,” in Wolfgang Haase and Hildegard Temporini, eds., ANRW II.25.6. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. 1989.
