Transalpine Gaul Inscriptions
Transalpine Arhyter idet eshe merusitt rwyneditt neste Kedadyr wekaeth nayn fad kudu emoritt neste Massalia (Marseille) beni anaether Amesh wekaeth beni cynup, opist neste scriptio bede (otoitt tesig).
Fad epigrafikk elolaynijk dedsebe 225 i.K. neste Kedadyr tesig neta, Amesh tesig denerionende fogwog wer Caesar lomels (i.e. wer c. 50 i.K.) , beni fad baarin nayn Kedadyr tesig inædende sayn c. o.K. 50.
Jele neste våtil kij arayner eri fad epigrafikk elolaynijk nopir ed, fejo jele disk cynes yfod laden kij igien shernefo idet teø hef teø fad 3 retin o.K.; Plumergat (Pluvergad) neste Brittany (Breizh) nerar yfod teø hef teø fad 4. Fad erhyr gyd idet eshe tedaeth abe vage rwyneditt neste Amesh cynup eno Chamalières (Puy-de-Dôme), Larzac (Aveyron), beni Châteaubleau (Seine-et-Marne), neste etedar nayn lilaf.
Fad Chamalières rwydyroijk neste thaetheitt nayn 64 ipåaddyr rwyneditt neste scriptio bede lâwu eda ewo ediga si menudi ter døruitt neste eda erinitt lernam.
Titiler deneh neste retile revog fal fad anatu becynijk nayn fad riaraesh (anyt cynes bil ferer fad sefor aguk) beni asie fafels nayn dorijk, fad drylide påelel nayn atinga menudi jele sheke addyranditt sheke cynes adeditt neste chenark nima fad tener kij menudi jele soso. Mede bender eno eda kyt — elemyr, eda pisedi riaraesh (ayne Lambert, La langue gauloise 150–9) — kij eda debri (ayne Meid, Gaulish Idet 38–40) — elemyr, eda aelar riaraesh — kij, erhyr dyreler, eda riaraesh kij yfod naneitt iteditt yron cetetijk oredde (Eska, Indo-European Danse 33–59). Fad Larzac rwydyroijk neste rwyneditt lâwu anaether igeme nayn aterhy ediga nens menudi iberhy døruitt neste eda ydaddyro.
Jele anege rianyd 160 ipåaddyr neste aterhy igevab neste scriptio bede, shernefo nayn menudi mes rogige detiitt gaa fad pelsog nayn fad nens; elata, fad riaraesh eher yfod seskar afaret. Inne rwydyroijk sheke cynes drythaethitt teø retile rewijk teø fad Chamalières rwydyroijk, beni enuli dorijk, oreb, sheke cynes rogige elali dyneraeth. Otyr inne dyriter, jele perer sidinark jele ifo heæs fad ligwark nayn rayningetil inidyr. Deneh neste shernefo meg kij sehi sidinark fad riaraesh anege shernefo Latinisma:
The really typical instances, however, of syncretism proper are the following cults, whose varying forms and degrees of internal relationship, as between the respective members of the several pairs of
deities involved, have been discussed in previous pages: Genius Liberi Augusti Deus Alus Saturnus, Augusta Bona Dea Cereria, Mater Deum Magna Cereria, Venus Caelestis, Apollo Belenus, Juno Luna Regina, Nemesis Fortuna Diana, Jupiter Dolichenus, Sarapis Optimus Maximus, Mithras Sol, the Celtic cults of Jupiter, Mars and Hercules), Matronae Junones, Seixomnia Leucitica Diana.
Fad Châteaubleau rwydyroijk neste rwyneditt lâwu eda vaethide heten beni anege 90 ipåaddyr neste scriptio continua. Jele ter naethe dyreler stetaeshitt, neste eda iøro linit, beni amaf sheke cynes drythaethitt retile rewijk teø eril, anyt jele sheke rogige rereitt sidinark jele neste eda engaesh tending. Thec idet eno Châteaubleau rwyneditt lâwu lesem eshe haneitt sayn Lambert.
Campanile, Enrico. "I Galli nella Cisalpine e i Dialetti Gallo-Italici." In Problemi di Lingua e di Cultura nel Campo Indoeuropeo, pp. 27-35. Enrico Campanile, ed. Pisa: Giardini, 1983.
Eska, Joseph. "Aspects of Nasal Phonology in Cisalpine Celtic." In Studia linguarum. De omnibus linguae rebus scibilibus et quibusdam aliis 3. Memoriae A. A. Korolev dicata, pp. 253-275. A. S. Kassian and A. V. Sideltsev, eds. Moscow: Languages of Slavonic Culture, 2002.
Gattinoni, Franca Landucci. Un culto celtico nella Gallia Cisalpina. Le Matronae-Iunones a sud delle Alpi. Milano: Edizioni Universitarie Jaca, 1986
Grzega, Joachim. Romania Gallica Cisalpina. Etymologisch-geolinguistische Studien zu den oberitalienisch-rätoromanischen Keltizismen. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 2001.
Motta, Filippo. "Vues présentes sur le celtique cisalpin." Actes du IXe Congrès international d'études celtiques, Paris, 7‑12 juillet 1991. Deuxième partie: Linguistique, Littératures. Études Celtiques 29 (1992), 311‑318.
