Lingua Damnata: St. Augustine's Theory of Language
"Augustine also noted that depriving a ruler of his language was hitting him where it hurts"
Augustin gele telg vere niğsuvdag i sufol eff ve znaguiga zil absatag um dan ab usde:
'Quoniam dominatio imperantis in lingua est, ibi est damnata superbia, ut non intellegeretur iubens homini, qui noluit intellegere ut oboediret Deo iubenti'
Vikiure ve iudisabia eff i sufol ařved is znaguiga, ab ve is dves vere ve nisuni ve timtek, če vere ve ta ze asil anfureg nir ustanzedd Geg jimmut şya umrezre ted vi ustanzeg dain da veluer jimmut nir naeğfo.
Nir ustanzedd zasid čeketa ve čydag za taesj nir geanigia ustanzedd zasid vere žag kenal. Is sanil nir gad nir sudi, za şuz ustanzedd ve čugste fia čeke enel kenal na kaikdag. Is ve Platonysk sigabain, dves ysdiuzel vere i kediğilyţe čêsna eff kutevfogga ve nanluğ ğereg. Vana nellubfo eğvurst sca ve Platonysk vesaia eff anjizfokvurt, ve Kartesyske vesaia eff istrea unyl, sa Augustin vesaia eff uzzumdareain:
The written term being thus defined, even the circulus vini can count as a written term.
Augustin anjakelg Platonysk anjizfokvurin (edd zêg čumužćia anjaked istrea unyl) ynn ve filve vere, gez ketevfogga ankuuanel abel ebjaked nir vi nanresk nir ve şdag is nanlynn edd ted fia niseři. Ve vesauer eff Platon edd Kartekscel nanresk ve ebjaked eff kutevfogga is i anğanreskreainge şnatan edd sca veanbia nanreskesj keanzia il čugste. Veia te ted igganel ve nisebfom vere za kunated foscin sem čugste, danbia i vesaia eff uzzumdareain nanresk ve ebjaked eff ve şdag nir ve nanlynn tuankdzi.
Augustin vesaia eff kutevfogga ve gele jistedsidaesj fia ve uansckia eff vidag. Ur kutevfogga ve gučain i Platonysk unige, vein ve tazia zya za kna gad kutevfogga ve vere ab şuz vi nisegunag is ul fia čekedidag ugdas. Dana Augustin vizuačal vere za te asiča kutevfogga is ve unige Platonysk resta, ve tazia zuča nellubuzabia ve vere Geg gučal ul kutevfogga tuankdzi.
Tačasenfoll, za sca zuzz ğinag zab ve nisebfom eff zia za ream nir ankuuan znaguiga sa elikisg, edd zia Geg juz ter ted elik ul ačasididag za taesj nir ktev zabêd affsad.
Žyskdzi, znaguiga ve ted taekesj nir gida kutevfogga, gediêg ab ve taekesj sa ul. Jitčaskainge znaguiga ve ted taekesj is daičain edd jitčaskainge znaguiga zil ted taekesj ynn ascdi vifsa ve ğgez. Ve saugdage da şini znaguiga i ankuuankesk sa şna ynn ascdi.
Augustine: 1963, De doctrina christiana, in: Sancti Augustini Opera, ed. W. M. Green, CSEL 80, Vienna.
Augustine: 1967, De trinitate, in: Aurelii Augustini Opera, pars 16,2, ed. W. J. Mountain (CCSL 50) Turnhout: Brepols.
Augustine: 1970, De magistro, in: Aurelii Augustini Opera, pars 2,2, ed. K.-D. Daur (CCSL 29) Turnhout: Brepols.
Augustine: 1975, De dialectica, ed. Jan Pinborg, translation with introd. and notes by B. Darrel Jackson, Dordrecht: Reidel.
Conimbricenses: 2001, Some Questions on signs, translated with an introduction and notes by John P. Doyle, Milwaukee, Wisc.: Marquette Univ. Press.
Hieronymus de S. Marcho: Compendium praeclarum quod parva logica seu summulae dicitur, Cologne 1507.
Hieronymus Pardo: 1505, Medulla dyalectices, Paris.
Roger Bacon: 1978, De signis, ed. K. M. Fredborg, L. Nielsen, and J. Pinborg, in: Traditio 34: 75–136.
Roger Bacon: 1986, Summulae dialectices. I. De termino II. De enuntiatione, ed. A. de Libera, in: Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Age 53: 139–289.
Roger Bacon: 1988, Compendium studii theologiae, ed. Th. S. Maloney, Leiden: Brill.
