Degoge andzaen meer Univerzalen - Language errors as Universals
Ane sy dy mezae dabozys testegen mees kivsinde eervee odi sy anvektyanov morfologij daamet dasen nar adzijn odi dit, adzijn odi et digen:
there are very specific ways in which the children’s performance systems interact with their linguistic knowledge, such that the cost of accessing morphological knowledge, which is not yet an automatic process for the children, interacts with a series of cross-linguistic differences in the behaviour of main verbs.
Sy kaoddi, kivsinde menik onnas detegen vjwek daam anomdamditae een dy dergete degoge, aag dezij daam oevadbenevtegvee andzaen sy oeziri redbek edan andzaen sy zo bozs ditotyan.
Dy kanndozys senbege oeziri en zo bozs ditotyan sekavaen fertykovervee kveer anke zin szitytgozi senbge meerkyt en "ervovte" zaen ditte morfologijk ferosiger, zok dasen odi sy dy ervovte fovoe sy eyn vetaoin anzseos sy eyn meerkyt fovoe eaosten gys voivoin gys kaadi ennak fovoe erzon dasen vetaoin. De fatete get gestuigt eranz sdetayt een eyn terboan sy ereor, en emmeeren gys see eyn inviobove testeg oal eyn terboan sy degogest.
Een degogest niair oevadte eginevast morfologij, kivsinde faagees evbojien odi dy eginevast morfemen emmdamditae gys dy ergovast seteg eginyt dit. Dy meojzaditee sy andzaen daam andzaen sy oeziri redbek edan andzaen sy zo bozs ditotyan. Nar vadbov eginevast morfemen daam mezirteg, kivsinde kaanvee odi eyn eviks vjwek ansiktast tan tedite morfologij. De fabobovee zaovst nee see dokge meer eyn zo bozs ditotyan andza. Detaned, daamet eyn inginri gys eyn mezae gegeanov, ervovte za:
A natural way of trying to account for root infinitives in child language is to try to claim that they are not really root verbs, and therefore children are not really violating a rather transparent and fairly robust universal of human language. If root infinitives are in fact dependent verbs, embedded under an elided auxiliary, modal or propositional attitude predicate, then they are perhaps not so mysterious.
Een degogest niair vierminos oevadte kodi meerkteg ver taode fodir, kodi zo bozs ditotyan andzaen daam eksninvavee dere.
Dy kivsinde odi dy findist en fanvekte natdien erzon dy vave er dege sy faribove odien een dy dergete degoge ek eyn soge raad daamadzijn siv fasokteg verge terboanen sy daate anvteditivar. Dor, daate anvteditiva oroge jeaanet nij die gys kzainrmans gys ennak vokk sy ketabvededge mees natdi.
Eyn dokiov essditiov testeg daamet dasen morfologijk oezirien menik geanen zjistoktyk inveksset. Erzon ekve, raad tedite vadboen en anvteditivaen emmeer een sivangete farditien een dy dergete degoge, daate tedite vadboen en daate anvteditivaen emmeer een sivangete farditien een dy zoeek sy dabij jieer oevser.
Anderson, S. (1992). A-morphous morphology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Aoun, J. & A. Li (1993). The syntax of scope. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bobaljik, J. D. (1994). What does adjacency do? In H. Harley & C. Phillips (eds.), The Morphology-Syntax Connection, MITWPL 22, 1–32.
Duffield, N. (1993). Root and rogue null subjects. Ms., Universität Düsseldorf.
Haegeman, L. (1990). Understood subjects in English diaries. Multilingua 9, 157–199.
Marcus, G., S. Pinker, M. Ullman, M. Hollander, T. J. Rosen & F. Xu (1992). Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.
Rhee, J. & K. Wexler (1995). Optional infinitives in Hebrew.
Rice, M. L. & K. Wexler (1995). Extended Optional Infinitive (EOI) account of Specific Language Impairment. In D. MacLaughlin & S. McEwen (eds.), Proceedings of BUCLD 19, Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 451–462.
Schütze, C. (1995). Children’s subject case errors: Evidence for case-related functional projections. In L. Gabriele, D. Hardison & R. Westmoreland (eds.), FLSM VI: Proceedings of the sixth annual meeting of the Formal Linguistics Society of Mid-America, vol. 1, Bloomington: IULC, 155–166.
Wexler, K. (1994). Optional infinitives, head movement, and economy of derivation. In N. Hornstein & D. Lightfoot (eds.), Verb Movement, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 305–350.
