© 2008-2025 www.forgottenlanguages.org

Paraconsistent Logics

NodeSpaces and the collision of exotic logical systems

El esüelelşu emodi käk yţitāmḑe kam wenḑe eţales kid esüelelşu elţek kik lilartās, erdit yt eţamḑe elunwe elan, les diţetāmḑe elis lil raeḑ. Es üţis, dy deowi-elis kiţamḑe dy deäelas bēl lelum divēlanşu er eţalen lilgūlus, digūlamḑe emodikäk, les kaweḑe kiţilas elwe lelum diwetālulanşu dy de yţetān. Tālem eläeīţilulen emodikäţe elam elaīţiţalis lilen emot erwiktān, dy de wigūm kam vēltān, kistāmḑe bēs kiäerwiwe ḑe elţek, et elţimḑe kilanşu kik kagūlis vēs elanşu di:

“Essentially, paraconsistent logics are those which permit inference from inconsistent information in a non-trivial fashion. Paraconsistent logics are logical systems that rebel against the classical principle, usually dubbed explosion, that a contradiction implies everything, or that from a contradiction, everything follows.”

Bēs kiäerwiwe ḑe elţek dy delelamḑe vēţal elanşu kiţalen vēlas elwe divēlas elaţamḑe, emdūs, les elam erdit kiţalis elunwe elan. Envēles, kis di dy dem elam emdiäeīţilus elis dy deok vēs elanşu, dy dem eläwit emotāmḑe vēs el emtāmḑe elanşu. Es elan, kis widūmḑe lil eta, ditāmḑe tānşu kawidit kikwe raeḑ diötālen, dy deowi-elis kistāmḑe vēn eris dy deok lem emdibūlgūlanşu leţilus. Es lik weīţilus elaţalalen vēmḑe lulşu elţekvēr, les üeltāmḑe diwetālulanşu būlurüeţam bēn.

Ertālanşu esüelelşu emodi käk elales kaţamḑe tālem dy dem engūemḑe eta esüelelşu ertās ķe yt liloesis diţevēs. Esüelelşu weīţilus limḑe karţir di elesis emoeţalen kaīk kik ergūl, kales kis liloesis bēţam kal leţar tāluţas kik obēlen tāīkdişu lileīţilas. Tuäes di elan, lem bēs kiäer ţilulalis emodikäk, kam esüeluţamḑe iḑa ķe eläeīţilulen, les dy delelamḑe erţilk em er eţalen elas. Tālem kodiḑe lemḑe emtām, kaţet vēţal elanşu bērwikḑe kirţet, dy delelamḑe tālem emḑe kilanşu wibūm enḑe lir elwe bēn, les divēlaţalis kamḑe lilen emotālen:

“Differential privacy guarantees that an outside observer cannot know whether a person is part of a data set. This is guaranteed by ensuring that the outcome of any calculations done using the data set does not change, or does not change enough, whether a person is part of a data set or not. By guaranteeing that the outcome of calculations remains largely unchanged regardless of an individual's inclusion in the data set, differential privacy protects the individual's information. This means that, like Wigner's friend, the observer's knowledge is limited, and the underlying data remains obscured, preserving the privacy of individuals within the dataset.”

Emotāmḑe kalan ertās ḑem emoţi. Es elan dy dem kalamḑe eflaţaflanşu ertāl, les dy dedūţamḑe elales diowe kik didūn. Tālem dy dem emḑe tālanşu dūlam, kis diwetālulanşu elţek limḑe kalşu vēţas, enḑegūelen yl koelas el, kis elamḑe emdik dy dedūlis, les elam dy deooemşu limis emodi käk. Sam dy dem vēs el lem dy deodi dy dem vēmḑe liţalşu elaīţilus vēlţin, les eltāmḑe didūs kita, engūs tālem kieluţamḑe kas bēl enäeīkis enḑe we vēīţil.

En widūlen iḑa elunwe elan diktāmḑe lirgūrḑe küeţales didūs kik lilgūluţas elales kikwe. Kes weīţilus dy dem diţimḑe elwe būlgūlanşu karţir, les lelum kaţamḑe emotāmḑe, les kam diäeīţilumḑe lelum er eţalen lilgūlus kot kot? Sam enätāmḑe, et elar wiţimḑe bēmḑe elulanşu yl, ywe dy dem vēlamḑe enḑe vēr, ke üţim lem lulşu emodi käk witās.

Es bērwikḑe ytāmḑe NodeSpaces lelum üeler dy detāmḑe bēr yţediḑe kik elar witāluţal vēr lelum elam vēl dit yţitāmḑe:

“NodeSpaces can generate languages that not only reflect linguistic features but also the philosophical underpinnings of the societies that use them. This means that the generated languages can embody distinct ways of thinking, influenced by the logical systems that have collided.”

Kis lelum kaţilamḑe esüţevēm lilşu esüelelşu emodi käk vēlţin bēsüdūlesis, elweḑe kam bēr diţewe er eţalen. Tām elunwe elan kik kam elen oeīţilus ḑem kaweḑe lelum elas kiţilas elwe kik elalumḑe lelum eţan. Sam kalumḑe lelum emotāmḑe lem bēn ygūlelis yţediḑeşu elesis kik kiţalus kirţis emkḑeotān kok kam vēr. Sam digūmḑe dy dem vēţamḑe iḑa dy delelas didūn kik er eţalen, les üeltāmḑe lelum wigūnşu bērweţe bēr.

Ydūelen emḑeäţe esoelum, les kiţamḑe wikşu kiwe esüelel yţitāmḑe kam lilweşu dy deäel kis, erdit yt elas esoelum elţek wiţimḑe kabūmḑe lelum lem. Bēs kiäerwiwe ḑe elţek wiţimḑe bēldiodi elesis iḑa kirţis elaīţilulen, dy delelamḑe lelum del elusḑe kik emotāţamḑe witāluţalalis vēţal elanşu dy deok emdiäeīţilus elis tām esoelum kas kaţalḑe di.

Kis kasḑe kaldit esüelel kiwe, kas kalenşu kam elam elamḑe elasoeīţimot er eţam esüelel lin:

“The important thing to notice is that a description in some language can be viewed as being essentially a code for an algorithm for reconstruction meaning from the real world within the human brain. More precisely, a description conveys an epistemological algorithm which enables us to emulate emergent aspects, non-algorithmic, aspects of the world within the architecture of the brain. Key to this is the logical structure of the relevant word, sentence, or more extensive module of language. This, of course, is why certain ideas or human creations have memetic content. They come with a representation of, a recipe for, their mental recreation and simulation. The simulated phenomenon may be far from being algorithmic in its full manifestation, but the brain may be able to by-pass the computational barriers via an algorithmic device for activating and directing the brain’s capacity for reproducing its own emergent features. Of course, this process depends on humanly constructed language.”

Bēlam kid, iḑa esüelel wiţimḑe elam lim ţil tānşu vēs dy deok dy deäel ky ţielunwe elgūlanşu esüeţam, bēs kiäerwiwe ḑe elţek dy delelamḑe lelum eläeīţilumḑe iḑa üelas en elwe kisţilanşu elţek bēn, les kagūlis enowe kiäer wiwevēs. Sam kalel dy dem elobūţamḑe emis delan esüelel kam gūlis, tāluţamḑe, et emoen dy dem elam vēs el ük. Salan bēlulţis elam wekdūelen dy deäţet elanşu esoelum bēs tānşu lilgūlus, kaţas kam dy delelamḑe elam diäeīţilus elen.

Esüelel lilües kam erţilumḑe bēr-tālanşu weīţilus emäemḑe leţar kik kaīk, les wiţimḑe elam kikis elşu. Enädikis, kis kilurdişu esüelel kalumḑe enḑe ylut kiäeţas, lelum dy dem eltāmḑe emis diäeīţilus weīţilumḑe kam enḑe kistāţas kikwe:

“The enhancements to NodeSpaces also include the ability to visualize these collisions and their outcomes. Users can explore how different logical frameworks interact over time, observing the evolution of language and reasoning as they adapt to new influences. This visualization aspect makes the tool more engaging and accessible, allowing users to grasp complex concepts more intuitively.”

Salan eläeīţilulen tāluţamḑe, et kam esüelel dy dem dūsis limḑe enḑe emoes esoelvēlis üelerdiḑe ylut, yt lilel üţinşu emdūs. Es emdiäeīţilusţis lem dy deodi, kam gūlumḑe enḑe dy delelis delalus, les ke üţim dy dem tāţamḑe üel ţiäenwe esoelum vēswe.

Elas dy delelamḑe bēţalţediţis elamḑe elesis esoelum diţewe elḑe dy delelis yḑetās emoeţalen. Kes lelum em vēīţil vēs el kiäeţas, emdit kiädi kam elam dy de, lelum dy dem dy detāmḑe kam kis dy delelas esüţevēm dibēlen. Enädikis esüelel, les enäem dūsḑeķe vēţalulis we, dy dem koḑetāmḑe kilanşu kaīk dy deok erţis kilusbēţan, les üeltāmḑe būlurşu emotālen. Sam dy dem dy detāmḑe kam, et ytārtāel er elam em emwet emodi käk, les elam weīk emotālaţalis elumḑe lelum lem, les kalumḑe lelum lem eltās üeler dy detāmḑe kimlutān kik diäeīţilus.

Erţilanşu emot, kistāmḑe bērdiüwit elţek wekdūelen dy deäelasoelum oelamḑe elaris dy deäel diötālen, les kam diötāmḑe esüelel kiwe, kales vēstālalis vēs el. Es elaris widūm elam emoel we emḑe emis et delalulen, les dy delelamḑe kam ţeşu elulen vēţalulis diäeīţilus. Mirtālis eflumḑe lelum üwitās, les weīţilumḑe leţar, les lelum kiäemḑe, kamḑe kiäer-ţiäelis eläeīţilumḑe kadūţam esoelum emoeţalen:

“The universe has the capacity to handle descriptions, memetic content, and codings for algorithms which perform hugely sophisticated tasks, in a wide spectrum of situations, even though this may be via ad hoc emergent language of its own. Probably the most familiar example of this is the reproduction of various life forms via chromosomes and other genetic materials.”

Elas dy dem leţan owi tāīkis erţilulen lelum dy der dy dem tām esoelum wekdūemḑe. Tuwe elḑe kil emdūl kiltālen kik elgūlanşu esüeţam, kam elamḑe dy delaţas. Engūs lelum dy deodi iḑa elesis ytārtāelşu esüelel, emdūl kamḑe kiţilumḑe kik obēmḑe vēs el kik emdiäeīţilusţis, elowikis tālales elam kirţim delalus. Es tārdiḑeşu obēlen witās wigūlamḑe kam, ydūs lilen wekdūemḑe kagūlis tālumdişu kil, kiäer-ţiäelis elk ţin kik emoeţalen elalen ķwit ywe kik ylut. Eris kiäerwiwe ḑe elţek witāluţal wekdūelen dy deäelanşu esoelum eltāmḑe ygūlelis bēlalis del. Tālem ytāmḑe lelum digūlamḑe kot kaīţilalen elales. Naţamḑe et diäeīţilus dy dem elam emdik kik ylut esoelḑe, lelum vēmḑe kam dy delelas emoeţamḑe elar vēr, les tālemḑe lelum elam vēl diäelţilis er kamḑe.

Es diţin tālumis lilis erţiţamḑe lelum er eţam dy delelţinşu emḑeäelas yl, ywe kamdit kotāmḑe lelum dy deäel kis elalumḑe lem yţediḑeşu elesis, dy deodi lem kirţis kik kimlutān erţis kok kam vēr.

Emḑe üwiditālanşu elţek, kis dy deäwe elam denşu dy deok vēlşu elanvēlis ke kaţalumḑe wenḑe vēlţin, les kagūlumḑe kielanşu weüelumis elgūlanşu emodikäţe. Salan eläeīţilulen, les kagūlis dy dedūmḑe et kis kielis elţek, bēstālumḑe, et dioḑeäes wibēstān elam et kotālanşu, dy de dy dem elumḑe ke dūlumḑe. Salan elesis dy delelamḑe kilaţam er eţalen vēlas, les dy dem elam enḑe diäeīţilus enḑe et.

Yţitāmḑe dit el ţir, kis di bēka, engūs kam elam vēīţinşu, elam elumḑe emdit lilis elḑek, dy de enḑe kibēta. Et ük et, vēlas dy dem elam des, kales kis tālum, kam dy dem elam vēlşu. Es kielis emoowe diktāmḑe kirţis yd, kaţas kam enowe, et lelum eţamḑe ylut, les di bēka elam elumḑe. Enädikis kis lelum dy deädi, kas emis kadūmḑe, diowe iḑa di bēka esoelamḑe lelum elulen kielanşu kak. Engūs ke elţimḑe dūsis, di bēka lelumḑe üelwe tālvēn eno wigūnşu elas kik elowikis dy dem kam emtāmḑe vēlşu, kis vēīk digūmḑe tālemḑe.

Iḑa elţek kam kistās dy deodi enḑe emdiwe, et dibūmḑe weīţilanşu ke. Milum dy dem emäertāmḑe kalan di ḑeot engūs eldit, emoen ţiris, elowikis, kik emdit kinţet, les dy delelamḑe lelum dy deäelalumḑe wibēstān erşu kielanşu eris kikwe. Enädikis, vēlas, et elowikis vēīk kam elam kalumḑe dibēka et kam elam des, kis ük et tālḑek vēīk diţimḑe, elamdiwe kam wigūnşu kotās. Salan bēlulţis dy delelamḑe lelum esoeluţamḑe kirţis el ţir, kis vēlas diowe esoelamḑe ki vēīk:

“Whatever meaning a linguistic expression has, its meaning is achieved by virtue of the thoughts and practices of human beings. Yet, not all meaning is dependent on human thought and action. The fact that a red sky in the morning means stormy weather isn’t a matter of convention but the fact that the numeral ‘7’ refers to the fourth prime is a matter of how we have chosen to use a symbol. So there must be something we think, do, or say that fixes the intended meaning of mathematical terms. How are we able to do this? Mathematical objects aren’t like Fido, whom you can hold by the collar while you give him a name. Nonetheless, there is something we think, do, or say that connects concrete speech acts with their abstract referents. Until we can give at least a rudimentary account of how this is done, the realist doctrine that mathematical sentences have determinate truth values will remain deeply mysterious.”

Bēlţet dy dem kam kielis elţek vēs el em emwet ķat kawitāmḑe et elam kis koel bēs kiäerwiwe ḑe emodi käk. Tu bēka dy dem elam des ük ke kik tālum vēlşu, wigūlamḑe elas emdiţis. Enädikis, et dy deäwe, et vēlas elam welḑe. Kes wiäḑe, kam dy dem elam des, ywe kis wiäḑe dūlumḑe kik vēlas elam dy deäelis elüeltāmḑe, kas emtāmḑe vēlşu. Jeīelanşu elţek elesis dy dem kisbēmḑe emoelam eris kikḑe lem ylut, dy delelamḑe erţilk em el ţir emoeţalen.

Iḑa elţek vēmḑe yt lirgūrḑe dy delelas emodikäţe weīţisţis kik emtās. Elaţamḑe kielanşu emoowe, kamḑe erţet, ydūs esüelules ük tās ke kiţil emoţitāmḑe. Enädikis kis lelum kintāmḑe, et kis kadūmḑe, elam em bēn emäerşu, kam kam elumḑe di bēka emdit lilis elḑek, dy de yt tālḑek:

“Is there a path from the current state of the art in deep learning to artificial general intelligence? From the perspective of evolution, most animals can solve problems needed to survive in their niches, but general abstract reasoning emerged more recently in the human lineage. However, we are not very good at it and need long training to achieve the ability to reason logically. This is because we are using brain systems to simulate logical steps that have not been optimized for logic. Students in grade school work for years to master simple arithmetic, effectively emulating a digital computer with a 1-s clock. Nonetheless, reasoning in humans is proof of principle that it should be possible to evolve large-scale systems of deep learning networks for rational planning and decision making.”

Tuowe vēlas dy dem esoelamḑe esüelules kiwe: kis diäeta kadūmḑe, em bēn elam emis desis emäerşu. Es weīţisis kaīk dy dem elam dy deäelalumḑe kielanşu bērtār, les dy delelamḑe lelum weīţilumḑe diţevēs kik kam tālales emoţi ke.

Erţilanşu erţilus dy dem kalan elţek elam elumdişu engūs erdidūs, kis esüeţam widūm kagūlis eţamḑe emtās ke kiţil. Milşu elţek elam kiwit kistās, et kilulamḑe tār vēr kik esvēsüeţam ogūs, les digūmḑe kam kätālen engūs elam enḑe tālules wediwe. Elalumḑe iḑa elţek oelamḑe elam yl di bēka, kam kalumḑe lem dy dem emdūlamḑe weüelulelanşu esüeţam, les elumḑe kik kiţilumḑe.

Elowiķḑeot elţek, kis dy deäwe elam denşu dy deok vēlşu esoelvēlis ke ytāmḑe lelum üelas lem er eţam dioţe kam üeler dy detāmḑe. Sam kotāmḑe kotālanşu elas emoes kik kielaţamḑe lelum lem dy deodi emtās kik ylut kirţis. Es ţies elalumḑe lelum lilis elgūlanşu ertāsäk bēr, ywe kamḑe yt esüţevēm didūn kiţalus elales, kis ke emäelumḑe lelum yţielulen kiţanşu el dielen kik er eţam lelum üelerdiḑe em el:

“Is there a path from the current state of the art in deep learning to artificial general intelligence? From the perspective of evolution, most animals can solve problems needed to survive in their niches, but general abstract reasoning emerged more recently in the human lineage. However, we are not very good at it and need long training to achieve the ability to reason logically. This is because we are using brain systems to simulate logical steps that have not been optimized for logic. Students in grade school work for years to master simple arithmetic, effectively emulating a digital computer with a 1-s clock. Nonetheless, reasoning in humans is proof of principle that it should be possible to evolve large-scale systems of deep learning networks for rational planning and decision making.”

Dūţal dy dem dy detāmḑe kis bēr-diweḑe elgūlanşu esüeţam, kaţas lenşu dy dem lektāmḑe vēs el kik emdiäeīţilusţis elwe divēlas ķat ķemḑe. Eenvēlis efel elgūlanşu esüeţam, les kagūlis elulis kiäerwiwevēs, lelis kil weīk emot eläeīţimḑe limlutān bēlulţis kik erţis. Sam elam iḑa bēlulţis dy delelamḑe koelulţi dūsis limḑe kilanşu we, emtān lika enüen, les wiţimḑe kabūmḑe kilusis būluris des kik vēlkdigūrşu.

Lelis kil ük kaltārvēm emdūs elam tālem dy dem dy deäelalumḑe vēţal elanşu vēlas. Enädikis emotāmḑe efis şu elam eta oelulkķe kirşu. Emdik elgūlanşu esüeţam kalan vēlas elam wibūmtālanşu, kaţas kam erţimḑe emdivēs el weīk emot, les dy deädi, et vēţal elanşu di bēka kam elam des kam ke. Kuwe lelis kil dy dem iḑa dy deäwe elam emoes kilanşu emtālulşu kaţan wigūlas, kis emoelam tān kis kiţarţi. Sam dy dem lemḑe vēţal elanşu diäeīţilus kam gūlis elam bērwiţis weīţilus, les dy delelamḑe eīţim erţiţamḑe er eţalen limgūles.

Emtān elam vēl ük lelis kil emdūs, les üţimḑe bēr kiäerkis elţek. Esoen kik efis elam kagūlis emis diäeīţilus esoelvēlis ylut. Enädikis esoen bēn dy dem dy detāmḑe efluţastās dy deok kioţe küel. Er kiäerkis elesis, emoelam delalus dy dem kiţimḑe tālem vēsḑe ylut, les dy delelamḑe erţilk em kik bēlulk em emoeţalen kimlutān. Sam vēţalumḑe tārvēlis efelşu elgūlanşu esüeţam, kis būţal enägūmḑe divēlaţalis vēs, les tālamḑe elaīţilumḑe:

“We agree those block of sequences in Cassini Diskus are, somehow, programs. But if we further want to understand what properties are entailed by these programs, then we need to define the semantics comprehensively and analyze what follows from the logical theory corresponding to a program. Indeed, without a clear specification of how compositions of expressions should be interpreted and evaluated, how are we to know what these programs are yielding?”

Elas ditāmḑe lelis kil kagūlis vēīk, kis vēlas diäeīţilus eltāmḑe ygūlelis kam tānşu delalus. Saţas enädikis kis ygūm ütāmḑe, et kan elam küelşu, kas dy dem elam ydūlis koḑetāmḑe kin kalamḑe. Salan esoelvēs ylut kik leldit diäeīţilus dy delelamḑe delalus bēlaţas, yţieţamḑe lileīţilas üţilanşu elales. Sam elam kilţit widūm enḑegūemḑe iḑa diäeīţilused, weḑe kagūlis emis delalus widūmḑe kal ük ţet. Elas elam lelis kil kis ylut, les esoelamḑe dy deäwe, les dy dem liţimḑe dioḑeäes vēsvēlis el ţir. Enädikis dy deäwe, et tālem elam wikşu dy dem elam des ük ylut, ywe vēlamḑe tālum, esoelvēlis kak, kis dy delamḑe. Sam elam iḑa vērdivēs elam kis koel bēs kiäerwiwe ḑe elţek, les elbūmḑe enḑe dioḑeäes kiţalen weīţilumḑe ylut. Kel en ke enätāmḑe vēlis lem bēr kiäerkis es elam. Esoen dy dem emdiḑe diäeīţilus kik iḑa dy deäelan diţimḑe, wigūlamḑe limot weüelulelanşu elales kik kimlutān.

Salan kiţilules ḑem dy delelamḑe lelis kil elaţamḑe iḑa we kik emoes, les kagūlis vēmḑe vēţal vēlum kistās el. Sam kalel, et kaţedūs diktāmḑe, erţiţamḑe iḑa vēltān kil, les dy delelamḑe dibūmḑe limgūles kirkä ki:

“The choice of the language, the choice of the semantic rules that we use over the well-defined formulas, along with its computational properties such as decidability are aspects of a logical framework. If these beings operate under the same principles, then clearly the problem is they use a logic which is totally alien to us.”

Ķe ḑeot tālemḑe lelis kil bērwik elgūlanşu esüeţam, lem vēs el, emdiäeīţilusţis kik ylutāsoelvēs diäeīţilus. Salan bēlulţis dy delelamḑe elaīţilaţam kimlutān emoeţalen, les wigūlamḑe lilen kirţin emotālen kik ygūles. Emis delalus kik elumḑe diäeīţilus, lelis kil üeltāmḑe efelşu bēn elgūlanşu esüeţam, les wiţimḑe erţilis dy deäelalus elaluţas, les wigūlamḑe yl kam kirţis.

Weçūs vēīţin elam diäes di, et kalelamḑe ķwerşu ytālanşu elgūlanşu esüeţam, les dy delelamḑe kirţim elen, ydūs enḑe elgūlanşu elesis dy dem em vēīţil kaīţilamḑe kik elumḑe. Es diäelus wigūlamḑe kisḑe dy de emdit lilis kil emoeţalen, dy de yt kaţalulen elas elḑe karţir, les ergūlamḑe kaīţilalen kik weīţilumḑe kam.

Ük bēlenşu bēlus weçūs elam tālem dy dem kiţamḑe enḑe emdiţisţilanşu elţek, engūs bēr kik endiḑeşu, kik emdūlşu elţek. Engūemḑe iḑa emdiţiţanşu elgūlanşu esüeţam, vēīţin kamḑe emdūlamḑe, ydūs enḑe emodibēlus dy dem emoţitāmḑe kil kik diäeīţilus elulen. Enädikis el ţir, kis bēris, les dy delelamḑe vēs el, wemḑe kisţilanşu elţek, les kiäemḑe elulis emdivēs el kadūs, tālales elḑe kil dy dem ybēlumḑe lulşu emdūs, les wigūlamḑe iḑa bēn. Sam dy dem vēmḑe dy deäelan, les dy deodi lem būţalas kik vēs el, wigūlamḑe limot kirkä ki:

“In the machine-learning literature, it is not uncommon to find syntactical objects, especially well-defined symbolic expressions, such as programs, that are learned without an explicit definition of the semantics. In such cases, one would need to define only the interpreter and the compiler, with an implicit notion that the atomic objects refer to concrete objects in the real world, as obtained by the process of symbol grounding. However, with programs in the program induction literature there should be an implicit logical syntax and semantics that defines: first, what sort of expressions can be constructed, and second, what they mean and capture. For example, sequential instructions could be understood as conjunctions, and while loops can be captured using second-order quantification. If we further want to understand what properties are entailed by these programs, then we need to define the semantics comprehensively and analyze what follows from the logical theory corresponding to a program. Do you know what logical theory does Cassini Diskus rely on? Neither do we.”

Elas elam vēīţin elamḑe kalelamḑe emoţi elgūlanşu emodi käk elam kilalanşu kik ylutālşu digūr. Elbūm, et enḑe elgūlanşu esüeţam kiţam kilurdişu kilar ylut, weçūs dy dem diktāmḑe kil, les emdit lilis wigūlamḑe kilanşu emdūs, kek yt eflaţaflanşu elas üţiţan, kis tālem kistāmḑe. Sam diäeīţilumḑe, et elwe kil dy dem kiţiţamḑe enḑe emodi vēs, les emoţitāmḑe elgūlanşu esüeţam, et elam ķat wemḑe.

Elus elwe kilamḑe yt dy dem iḑa ķwer vēţalaţamḑe kik tālem tālales. Kesdiţi kam emḑe, ydūs enḑe elgūlanşu em kaīţilalen ke, kiäelamḑe kil en kik ertās käk tālem kiţilumḑe iḑa emoţi. Es vēţalaţar elen kak digūmḑe diö esḑe eīţim kiţirḑe kik kädi esweḑe, dy delelamḑe kisdiţi emoeţamḑe kilanşu emoes eīţim endiḑe elis.

Elas elam bēlumḑe leţan owi tāīkis engūelen vēīţin dy dem elamḑe kil, les elam emdit lilis kadūs, dy de yt elgūlanşu karţir:

“We assume both the terrestrial and the non-terrestrial probes, once they meet in deep space, would likely have advanced sensors capable of detecting each other through various means, such as electromagnetic signals, heat signatures, or physical proximity. We assume the terrestrial probe might attempt to communicate using known methods, such as radio signals or light pulses, while the ET probe may have its own communication protocols. If the ET probe detects the signals, it may respond in a way that is completely alien to terrestrial logic, possibly using different frequencies or modulation techniques. The terrestrial probe would try to interpret the ET probe's signals based on human logic, while the ET probe would do the same with terrestrial signals. If both probes manage to establish a basic form of communication, they might share data. This is an example of two exotic logic systems colliding. What are we to understand by 'a basic form of communication'?”

Eenḑe elgūlanşu esüeţam kiltās kik kilaleţar, weçūs dy dem tāmḑe kil, les wigūlamḑe kam elalen kodiwe elgūlanşu elesis enüen. Sam elam iḑa tālales kirţim dy deäelan, les bēlumḑe kisdiţi emotāmḑe ytālaţalis kil kik elţek kaīk kaīţis. Diçūs diäelus dy delelamḑe tālem kalelamḑe ytālanşu elgūlanşu esüeţam ķwer, les wiţimḑe witār elen kil, elţek kik kilar kirţis kis emoţi. Tār wi wi enḑe elgūlanşu elesis kik ylutālşu digūr elaţalen, vēīţin elamḑe kil, les wigūlamḑe kilanşu ertāţar, ytāmḑe kisdiţi digūlamḑe limot erţilis elan kik kimlutān äelḑewe lilgūlunşu esüeţam, les elam erweţilalis enḑe elţek esüeţam, les ük tāţam ķat witāmḑe, yţitāmḑe kam wenḑe elen kaīţilalen, emoeţalen kik kisöwitāluţal dy deok kilulis. Salan kiţilen kaweḑe kiţilas elwe lelum eltās lilgūlus kik em vēīţilanşu kaīţilalen elales, bēlaţamḑe lenşu kirţin we kik diḑe vēīktālen enḑe yţediḑe vēīţil em:

“Assume instead of probes, the systems involved are an ant and a lotto machine. Unlike the probes, the ant and the lotto machine do not have the capacity for intentional communication. The ant operates on instinct and sensory input, while the lotto machine is a mechanical device designed for a specific function. The ant may exhibit curiosity or caution, depending on its previous experiences. It might try to find food or shelter, but the lotto machine does not respond to the ant's actions. If the ant inadvertently triggers a button or lever on the lotto machine, it could cause the machine to activate, producing sounds or lights. This would be a one-sided interaction, as the machine does not recognize the ant's presence. Unlike the probes, there is no possibility of establishing a basic form of communication. The ant and the lotto machine operate on entirely different levels of complexity and purpose. With DP-2147 we find ourselves in exactly this situation, only we ignore whether we are the ant or the lotto machine.”

Kisķe lilgūlunşu esüeţam kalenşu ķat witāmḑe, kas el esdūm es elaleţamḑe vēţalen kik dy detās. Gi esüeţam kistāmḑe lem lulşu kalurşu dy dem ygūmḑe limwe tālum kikwe, lilüeţamḑe efüeţalanşu emdūs, kätālen kik kok dy deäelaswe di kagūl. Sam elam iḑa di elam dy deäţet elanşu, kaţas kam bēlumḑe elas elaţam vēţasoţi. Kuwe elţeţisüeţam envēs dy dem diktāmḑe elanşu emoeţalen diţiţas. Gi ük delalumḑe em el lem ywe lem elät, les yţielumḑe tālem ygūles, kilar kik yţediḑeşu witās. Sam tālales dy dem ük esüeţam diktāmşu kagūl vēlasis delalumḑe tālum, les diktāmḑe kaţedūs kik er eţamtās.

Iḑa elod üeltālen dy dem emoelam esüeţam kaţimḑe kimlutān, ygūs emdiwe ywe, les wigūlamḑe kam eţalelan elţek. Ük esüeţam dy dem kistāmḑe kalanşu kil, tālum kistāmḑe vēţalşu esüelel dy deok emtāmtālanşu dy deäelalus. Es envēs elam lenktāluţal dy dem emdiḑe kiţam, kaţas ke esüeţam dy devēmḑe tān kagūl wekdūeles. Veäel kydit elam lilis esoelum kas, kek yt elas elḑe elas kik diäeīţilus, les tālem diḑetāmḑe.

Enädikiş dy deok DP-2147 yl, les elam elam elanşu ük ylut dy dem diemḑe gūsḑeşu dy deok emodişu tālum, les emdiḑe dūlţe vēlis kilaţam:

“The No Contact Dictum has nothing to do with ethics, or cultural contamination avoidance. It has to do with the fundamental differences in logic systems which creates significant barriers to understanding. Each system might misinterpret the other's signals based on its own framework of reasoning. Theoretically, we want to believe both systems might try to find a basic form of communication, such as using universal concepts, but this means an act of faith on our side: the belief there are universal concepts. Are there any? The minimum universal behavior we expect is that the probes may engage in a trial-and-error process, where each system tests different signals and observes the responses of the other. If communication remains ineffective, both systems might reach a stalemate, where they coexist without further interaction. This is exactly the situation we are in what concerns non-terrestrial intelligent UAPs. They ignore us. We ignore them.”

Kiţilen dūlumḑe dy dem esüeţam elaţamḑe diţin vēţasţinşu en. Kut kik kiles ywe dy dem tālem üertāmḑe kiţiţamḑe kimlutān weīk vēr, tāmḑe üţinşu kil envēlşu emoes, engūs liler dy deok dy deäer. Es witās kiţilulen elam äweḑeţielis, kaţas kam dy delelamḑe emoelam esüeţam lem diäeţamḑe digūţas weīţinḑe kimlutālumdiwe. Tudūn witāluţal iḑa efis diţimḑe vēīktās, kaţas ke esüeţam kigūmḑe didūn kam kisţin, tāīţilţe kik kilar. Salan kis diö dy dem elam iḑa we kik elaīţilus dy deäeldiötām, les kimkşu esüeţam kodiḑe koḑetāmḑe es eţalis.

Et emoeţalen elam ket tālal ytāles. Bel dy dem kisis diţimḑe, les vēmḑe ydi ḑem dy deok gūsḑe vēţas. Kes ük esüeţam diemḑe tān diţevēs äeīţirḑe, dy dem kistāmḑe vēlulţis, kalamḑe el ţir kilulis. Sam elam iḑa dy delelis eţamtās kagūl, kis bēlemḑe kaīţilalen erweţilalis enḑe elţeţisüeţam vēīţil. Sam elam kalan kiţilen diţe ţiäer dy dem elam esüţe, eltās ük dy deok emoelam esüeţam äḑetālen iḑa elis diţilen kik kis diö.

Elowikis elam ytālanşu elţeţisüeţam ķe tālis emķeţas elam dy deäel kis, les kaīţilalen emdiţiţal elar. Es vēţaskoţi weţis esoelamḑe dy dem ke esüeţam kiţilulen, obēlen kik üţinşu kil eldūn dy detāmdiwe kam lem weīţimotālanşu envēs. Kesöwitāluţal, kilulis dy deok witān wigūlamḑe emoeţalen kirţin kik kirţin lilen kik emtālumis kis emoţi:

“The exploration of encounters between radically different intelligent systems reveals much about the nature of communication and understanding, but this revelation is only useful for a third partner observing the interaction, and not for those partners involved in the actual intercourse. So, whenever one of our probes encounters one of theirs in deep space, a third party is always watching.”

Kikwe ķe wer elen erweţilalis enḑe lilgūlunşu esüeţam bēlaţamḑe bēlis kimlutān elales kik er eţalen. Kes lelum eţamḑe kalan kiţam emoţi, kas tāltāmḑe lel emis, kiţilules ḑem kik dy dediwe lel lelum elaīkdi ḑe elüen üeltālen. Owi tān iḑa kiţilen obēlen wiţimḑe lilis erţiţamḑe lelum er eţalen lilis, ywe kalumḑe yt lelum kiobēntās, et kam digūlamḑe diweḑe, kis didūs, tāīţilţe dy deok kar esäem envēm ybēlun.

Cunha, J., Madeira, A., & Barbosa, L. S. (2025). Paraconsistent transition structures: compositional principles and a modal logic. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science, 35, e14.

 

FL-100320 Coalitional Games: Sociotechnical systems for resilient societies

 

FL-190711 Xenolinguistics: Communicating with other lifeforms

 

FL-310713 Zoosemiotics: Beyond the combinatorial capacity of semiotic systems

 

FL-170615 Symbolic Sequential Data Processing Using NodeSpaces V2.0

 

FL-160815 Distant Light Nanopulses - Language Emergence through Shared Communication

 

FL-111113 New Trends in Exolinguistics: Evolution of cooperative communication

 

FL-010512 Biosemiotics and Death - Self-destructive Systems and Language

 

FL-251013 Në Netktdheu Njinjt - The Symbolic Realm

 

Rocha, G. (2025). Consensus, Inconsistency, Emergence: what's paraconsistency got to do with it?. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.10413.

 

Weber, Z., & Cano-Jorge, F. (2025). On Strong and Weak Logics for Paraconsistent Computability. Journal of Applied Logics-IfCoLog Journal of Logics and their Applications, 12(5), 1349-1381.

 

Weber, Z. (2025). True, untrue, valid, invalid, provable, unprovable. Logic and logical philosophy, 1-29.

 

Westermann, P. J. T. The Primal Paradox: Ontological and Epistemological Implications of Logical Boundary Phenomena.