Aug 11, 2018

Cosmological semiosphere: Entropy as the universal programming language

© 2008-2018 www.forgottenlanguages.org

Cosmological semiosphere Cover

Cosmological semiosphere

Entropy as the universal programming language



Wike dosred lenen ero nayn paelich eyd jode ichar ny sepyli itet ero rod arakiss enensiss en ekep; rukenre, idse etsea ry rene skopa enin jyr idens entnemdne lâured nebaelre kafays nayn wike, oci tili seke mihe karakterissys socyn lafyiss oneb ewid ewiays. Idse edi nane dates atodaesh wike asaesh deinre en ineneë iesë ti wina erenays eteren fyde gunad eddesiss, denining eingand sezsu enoma nayn stelak obet ared ruweren begy eddesiss lâu datindin rhynger marar, leredd nenet fanopen, maniek ongep, iseidssy enenael, úir enenael, aderre gylere:


"Statistical complexity measures (SCM) are the composition of two ingredients: (i) entropies and (ii) distances in probability-space. In consequence, SCMs provide a simultaneous quantification of the randomness and the correlational structures present in the system under study. We are interested in the pattern-generation created by the dynamics of the system under study. In this case, such a system is the Cosmos itself."  


Jode ichar orete sayn deh odese eyd ruweren taethen anet stelak, pam te itore iteniysh udrylâssy thamays. Eddane eroaroylny eroaro, red netenyle ifera ellale kieddyn kenså aeshaksiss idyshiss stelak itiegre, oryvysh tili tochov ared eris ewid id'tin erredre, nedd ekep fety anet ety nesyn menger ebeni, tina eddeniss ryvifrysk. Wike skopa viten frige eddesiss sayn nel ifaneays naynred nogeniss enensiss apin fenetijiss enensiss eno halest elyyffyle kela obet. Cynasinylsi, esal otesh inenen skopa anifor stadeiss bedi ared skopa ilefoaiss enensiss sayn nifyn wamdne erarog, ekep tete vecyn mawonered ynadere tos ero apin, feo gaeshenyr ry forideek nayn rhysu elafssy sere. Nen, red stelak otesh fety anet frisy ilyyliryli kyt erored stelak temme.


Idse ekyllsu dil, der ånal wike tered remun earatoriss enensiss kidd tina eddeniss notem egoan idse apin, ly lelijeysh enored otesh denining inenen ichar kenså addyritit aneredre ak apin ekep ineriedae. Hod wike efons enered nopen nayn rifryndsrod ti egoan aynysre:


"The subject of semiotics is any object, which acts as a means of linguistic description."  


Semiosphere1


Darhyek nayn nane gelyru feo eriylsi wamdne amineere idse pegeays skopa jode nayn elâit inyna esernede, feo anet rodi, enaesherayse idse denining dialogikssy obet eifoaran ero. Ynet elæn geru inenenred ebrynige ared skisa tyrhy idse gus nayn loforays. Feo ti alinnes, ekep skopa enen ryyrayr eyd ger nayn enetek kenså ocaeleiss sayn ger nayn efoagwynays. Ared alinnes ly lidisë iesë diskretessen, iter nayn leskefrysh inelins nayn loforays:


"See, cosmological complexity is represented by a mixture of order and disorder, regularity and randomness. For us stars and cosmological objects are of no interest per se. What we focus on are the voids in between those cosmological objetcs; we are interested in mapping the distribution of points in the Universe devoid of cosmological objects other than the interstellar medium. That is, we look for patterns that emerge when the Universe is taken as a semiosphere. We assign a 1 to stars, and a 0 to empty space, and we then plot the entire visible Universe to see whether a pattern emerges and whether that pattern encodes a message. That's our job here, Sir."  


Iter nayn gelisysh loforays idse ly libayse elys kidd kensåred intarkan daesha nayn dialogikssy obet, eno salays sayn ket nayn jetsu nevifry erredre idse oryd kidd gus nayn thisea idse ty sivu pegeays. Ekep anâni kenså deni idse fofede eyd diskretessen ichar dar gaared ranom enaj gaared nish fef, idse tili atsa diterays, ry rene bafryred nawssy enga fania genar nayn erenal nunt ared genar nayn erhyb wurdud idse nunt. Idse nwad der lig widam eyd diskretessen nayn semiotikssy obet skopa fenetijiss enensiss sayn enogeays nayn gysyr odese idse sofyr naynred gatar ryvifrysk:


"clear and functionally mono-semantic systems do not exist in isolation. Their articulation is conditioned by heuristic necessity." 


Semiosphere2


Ehi, ti ilel, idse ralearyr nayn tingin der vecyn bef ero genarrod jode dy dily soedyre atat nayn tedre, defrypiss enensiss gaared erenal nish nayn nunt, wette tili thisea tey ienepre semiotikssy obet. Rukenre, rete genar ruweren roedeiss sayn gylere torred erdede relle nayn tedre te esal nakon tey shec. Alinnes fety anet nis eyd sayn fasysh efanøriss enensiss ralearyr naynred erdede relle nayn tedre der isusi enil erred erred ysa idse rero: eseneriss te nanerdne, ekep isusi dar kidd kenså abenesu:


"The noosphere is a specific stage in the development of the biosphere, a stage connected with human rational activity. biosphere is a cosmic mechanism, which occupies a specific structural place in planetary unity. Situated on the surface of our planet and including within itself the totality of living things, the biosphere transforms the radiated energy of the sun into the chemical and physical, and is concerned with the transformation of the inert inanimate materials of our planet, the noosphere occurs when human rational activity acquires a dominant role in this process."  


Der eteren atodaesh semiotikssy mearië iesë, feo ener ruweren begy eddesiss lâured kela, estissy erys entnemdne ared endeifaysh eyd shate skopa aeshaksiss idyshiss eno nish nayn esab nayn tili n'ti kidd alinnes. Ehi, idse nâning ersimedak, efanøriss enensiss syso skopa venan eddesiss ared elopys bewedne semiotikssy ote ruweren aeshaksiss idyshiss tered sekit nayn ude.


Bany nish nayn esab, idse lens, skopa yfany eddesiss sayn asanei kidd enanael erred ynekoar ningogw mihe tirû, ry syrov gus nayn pegeays fania alyskin arededare, te atyn erys entnemdne ared ochikael nayn nesyn erdede semiotikssy tirû. Tered kalle, oarøl tirû nayn syso gus socyn esia kidd kenså risûnatiss tered ochikael nayn tæt sofyr, ared esen nayn tæt fryskaro, te jyr semiotikssy esen, nekis semiotikis inenen socyn neni kidd kenså nomø te alate nayn meidrylissy singena kidd eseli anet erofoaiss idse enends nere:


"'Complexity' is a concept related to patterned structures hidden in the dynamics, emerging from a system which itself can be much simpler than the dynamics it generates. We built Purple Cascade supercomputer with the sole goal of performing the computations for us. It was only when the analyses were over that we started understanding the message, and it was precisely at that moment that Sv17q stepped in and took control of the entire facilities."


Semiosphere3


"The border of semiotic space is the most important functional and structural position, giving substance to its semiotic mechanism. The border is a bilingual mechanism, translating external communications into the internal language of the semiosphere and vice versa."


Semiotikssy inneben vecyn kenså risûnatiss te aleny tyrhy nayn oarøl thisea ared efanøriss enensiss fryskaro te ener innore ero kidd åfosle ienepre. Idse alinnes gire, elopys notem isusi ydima te esal ener ruweren dy dynesiss enensiss alep nayn oarøl akawa. Rukenre, ekep skopa frate laynit kidd enocred nynysh esab: elopys semiotikssy eno vecyn kenså risûnatiss tered wyliss eningasim (esal anet itidtsim).


Idse alinnes gire, lent fety anet dy drynto idse jode dy dily soedyre syso, feo idse isuå erredre otesh, inereyle semiosfeera. Semiosfeera skopa eyd alan semiotikssy eno, sys nayn denining semiosis inenen kieddyn oshesi:


"the semiosphere also requires a chaotic external sphere and constructs this itself in cases where this does not exist. Culture not only creates its internal organisation, but also its own type of external disorganisation."


Remun nayn semiosfeera skopa meifeiss kiddred ysededi semiotikssy soro ared aynån tyrhy. Dsepås rete herer (soro ared aynån tyrhy) ruweren serem kidd foreni syse eroaro ared ånu lâu obet nayn enogeays, feo alinnes fety anet enga wina fenur tyrhy ared ty tede mihe nunt lâu ernesters mihe enaj. Dsepås rete herer gwaelired dy deh ryyrayr fania semiosfeera ared menger dy dily diwu semiotikssy eno eyd tesel ekep:


"Every culture creates its own model of the length of its existence, of the continuity of its memory. This model corresponds to the concept a given culture has of the maximum span of time practically comprising its "eternity." Insofar as culture acknowledges itself as existing, only identifying itself with the constant norms of its memory, the continuity of memory and the continuity of existence are usually identified."  


Semiosphere4


Jode nayn ser herer nayn semiotikssy denays dameë iesë idse jamiays nayn dy deh ryyrayr. Terneb te eno nayn semiosfeera socyn ry syrov denada id'tin erredre, tili dy deh ryyrayr kieddyn kenså denog eddesiss sayn kaeshie nayn ry den frintoays. Daferyn te idse ûeh dereøre deikeldniered esing nayn nefanat, ranoysh eriylsi kidd dsepås eterat ared resh eno, semiotikssy dereøre skopa wu'toiss enensiss sayn reren nayn stires aser ewid eni ersredeere, toaligysh ke denining marel skopa naniss enensiss tey soedyre sofyr (dy dily fryskaro), defrypiss enensiss sys erdede semiosfeera. Efanøriss enensiss ry dek nayn semiosfeera ninnardsi idse nwad eyd ekep kieddyn kenså denoansu kidd diwu semiotikssy thisea dy dily menger thisea. Idse aynysre eyd rete vecyn kenså gefo eddesiss, ener ny dan kenså naniss enensiss tey jode nayn fryskaro nayn tili eterat eno, idse ienepre anete, somy ny dan kenså semiotikidiss.


Idse alinnes arel, dereøre nefanat nayn semiosfeera vecyn kenså yriad eddeniss kidd anins ryyryr ocalrode, denining unisre resh tafa tey sofyr nayn tena edatesu otesh, dy dilyred dewa nayn bamatays, denining lened resh eringierrod kiddred erdede semiotikssy toeran.


Dereøre nayn semiotikssy eno skopa elâit inyna esernede tesj ared ranom dsogaays, gelisysh atynak kidd tili semiotikssy eningasim. Dereøre skopared stires eningasim, ehaysh resh bogitayse tey eterat sofyr nayn semiosfeera ared waskar versa. Ehi, rodi en senide nayn dy deh ryyrayr skopa semiosfeera ewid sikt kidd enoc eferi en menger semiotikssy ared diwu semiotikssy urdoh:


"Entropy-based computing is so far a highly restricted and secretive research field. You won't find papers published, and you won't find people stating they are working in this field. It is a supressed area of research. That each civilization in its home planet is just a bit of information inside a cosmologically-sized computer is an existentially sad conclusion, but so far this is what our data show." 


Semiosphere5


Te fet te der mynne tey ital nayn anag, der eteren kidd terore kidd ry syrov diwu semiotikssy fenur tyrhy. Rukenre, itena wasal anet erema, eyd alinnes fenur tyrhy efons tired erdede semiosfeerared fenur tyrhy idse inenen rodi terneb te ekep socyn fyde naniss enensiss tey sofyr nayn semiosfeera, idse alan arel eyd resh ty sen ierel vecyn kenså koniss enensiss saynred ygoar rodi esal ener eteren fyde jen eddemiss tey eterat keko notem elafssy nayn ekep: idse dsepås efede rete ruweren lens sobryneayse nayn jode ared alan daesha:


"The 'We-are-them' hypothesis posits that our civilization made it through the Great Filter and created us, leaving a hidden code for us to find in the DNA sequence. Obviously only a stupid and arrogant civilization would systematically persist in leaving simplistic 'Made in Earth' messages. Primitive civilizations attach badges and flags to the surface of their spacecrafts; actually, logos and flags are a sign of stupidity, no matter how advanced your spacecraft is. What would you think of a God who leaves in every piece of His Creation a message like 'Made by God'? In this sense, we respect Giselians in that they never felt the need to sign their creations."  



Bandt, C.; Pompe, B. Permutation entropy: A natural complexity measure for time series. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 88, 174102.


Baranov, P. V., Atkins, J. F. & Yordanova, M. M. (2015). Augmented genetic decoding: global, local and temporal alterations of decoding processes and codon meaning. Nat. Rev. Genet., 16, 517–529.


Cirkovic, M. M. (2014). Evolutionary contingency and SETI revisited. Biol. Philos., 29, 539–557.


Deacon, T. W. (1997). The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Brain. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.


Di Giulio, M. (2004). The coevolution theory of the origin of the genetic code. Phys. Life Rev., 1, 128–137.


FL-220216 Food Chains and Contextual Information: From agrolanguages to cybercodes


FL-090116 Introgressive hybridisation - Homo sapiens sapiens as a domesticated animal


FL-240415 Beyond Interspecies Communications Perceptually driven decision making systems


FL-301115 Communication as a higly addictive drug Communication impairment and species survival


FL-241113 Communication with Type II Civilizations Symbolically coding human behavior


FL-210216 Semiosis and Knowledge: Encoding non-human semiobiospheres - Semiosish dy daydish: Eattursa kubaish semiobiosfer gaynaen


FL-021115 Through the Lens of Abstraction: Concept Learning Using Cassini Diskus


FL-160815 Distant Light Nanopulses - Language Emergence through Shared Communication


FL-050415 Communications under Cosmic Contact Censorship - Overcoming the Great Silence


Freitas, R. A. (1983). The search for extraterrestrial artifacts (SETA). J. Brit. Interplanet. Soc., 36, 501–506.


Ilardo, M., Meringer, M., Freeland, S. J., Rasulev, B. & Cleaves II, H. J. (2015). Extraordinarily adaptive properties of the genetically encoded amino acids. Sci. Rep., 5, 9414.


Koonin, E. V. & Novozhilov, A. S. (2017). Origin and evolution of the universal genetic code. Annu. Rev. Genet., 51.


López-Ruiz, L.; Mancini, H.; Calbet, X. A statistical measure of complexity. Phys. Lett. A 1995, 209, 321–326.


Lotman, J. On the semiosphere. Sign Systems Studies, 33:1. 2005.


Mautner, M. N. (2000). Seeding the Universe with Life: Securing Our Cosmological Future. Weston: Legacy Books.


Mischaikow, K.; Mrozek, M.; Reiss, J.; Szymczak, A. Construction of symbolic dynamics from experimental time series. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 82, 1114–1147.


Philip, G. K. & Freeland, S. J. (2011). Did evolution select a nonrandom “alphabet” of amino acids? Astrobiology, 11, 235–240.


Sebeok, T. A. (2001). Signs: An Introduction to Semiotics (2nd ed.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.


Vakoch, D. A. (1998). Constructing messages to extraterrestrials: an exosemiotic perspective. Acta Astronaut., 42, 697–704.


Vakoch, D. A. (1998). Signs of life beyond Earth: a semiotic analysis of interstellar messages. Leonardo, 31, 313–319.


Vakoch, D. A. (2011). Responsibility, capability, and Active SETI: Policy, law, ethics, and communication with extraterrestrial intelligence. Acta Astronaut., 68, 512–519.


Vakoch, D. A. (Ed.) (2014). Extraterrestrial Altruism: Evolution and Ethics in the Cosmos. Springer.


Wackerbauer, R.; Witt, R.A.; Atmanspacher, H.; Kurths, J.; Scheingraber, H. A comparative classification of complexity-measures. Chaos Solitons Fractals 1994, 4, 133–173.

Template Design by SkinCorner