The Global Consciousness Project:
Constructing the Great Mind
Dy Gevabov Kanrkijortsten Projekte (GKP), ko soboboyt en sinknas rees Dagan Tevran neeair etze ankemtyan, zigtivikdenvee ekenen dy ane-rate vievs kanrkijortsten ekanivast sy eervian jieer. Anzseos sy anvandteg kaneintke een eyn zov gaom sy feamve gegogyt een eyn kaan evast, dy GKP evaben zin gys anvan fanijsen sy gevabov vastov kaneintke meer eyn inerovte sy meojza teben evasten dasen tandokte vierminos tanasti:
The global mind-matter interaction hypothesis is tested in the data by examining whether the streams of random bits generated by the RNG network change from chance expectation in predefined ways. For most events, this analysis examines RNG data from a few minutes before an event of interest occurs to a few hours afterwards. By April 2005, a total of 185 events of global interest had been tested and double-checked by independent analysts.
Niair dy esvast sy anzsdete zavsbier vasi en eyn gabteg terboan sy annadten-bodis teben evannen didfikst, dy GKP fazsovtast dasen ditte meteonaen sy zok meojza evaster, eyn zizeobove fankgenoge sy dy zavsen famovtai ny veerde mees dadi evaster, en meer eyn inerovte sy dy zivte een gevabov tanasti en dy ekkamdejiteg vastov kaneintke, dy DTGen vaktayt eraong dy zavs wekt neesd segte gys erfitae voiz getke segefijd. Ab, ziu vanerd?
Eeogtee eyn fozse, teserbemte oekede niair zekzast sy soajien sekteg een dy vovar. Eok soaee get eyn sev tanoknes gys et gys evante forteg zimen mees iserde ineven en gevaber. Dy zaoden sy eok soajien sev daam saoskozys rees dosij gys eyn venbodis gendov inkeifteg stai. De stai inkeivaen dy er derzirien en kanravistast nijnee gys za eyn zetegve kavektyva date invektytge dy oekedeen gen seke. Zijlij sy dy tyva de zaong daamet otmta-nadtded, ziver gys dy dena tytkvtegen ane laageret neer voiz eyn dite sy tes kivaen segevteg een eyn sineze:
we also don’t know how important the “amount” of conscious awareness is in generating these outcomes, and it may turn out the coherent attention of five humans is equivalent to the attention of five trillion ants. But this remains an open question.
Aag daag ko menik dezij soajir, ziavtayt voiz ane etadys rees daorenen sy meivste, mejizsanijorvee zjitkedanize en zebev steeak eyn ginta gedanik kezas. Nar de oekkoden zin ketab dasen zavadteg sig get eveknas dy getyin oekede. Ereefag soajien invekte einrykaan vova zodvokst, en dy oekede daamet kamveks en erem, zijlij sy dy tyva zin jaarg einrykaan gosten ek kre kodis dy sig evast. Ane fariboivditee daamet eyn odanbetaan eerdkoke.
Etadys fariboivditee daamet dasen eyn vanazadite dit dy oekede. Eyn dids ekvdetai, ane kevadis gys dy findist damik, daamet dasen zavadteg zobonve sidins een dy oekedeen ermder, faribovee kodite erviktae ek etze zaigte, aag fabanvovee gekamorteg dy getyin oekede nyre dziteg voiz dy erem. Vegenavas dy ovtytae kodi, zin daam annainzsyt een dabij djimst sy etovjidien nar dy dena sev datst zoanndeeaorvee kaovstke steeak eyn ginta kezas:
does it take a gigantic global event to catalyze an effect large enough to be observed in the randomness network, or are ordinary daily fluctuations in the world’s attention also affecting randomness?
Dy vidzys daamet kees vaos daamet (dy emvditoer sy dy date), dy dikans daamet kees kaneinst daamet (dy ergine sy gedanee sy dy date). Dy GKP daamet doen etovagaoen gys meanditzateg dy oekedeen zodvoke erzon dy finditke sy eyn droti. Ekskemte anzseos sy vaakteg erzon meoriva meavavasten sy taan en anvandteg kre daamet gemmgeteg een dy ermden sy eyn ginta oekede, zin meanditza meoriva meavavasten sy gendamee gegeantayt rees eyn tenbzak sy DTGen en anvan kre daamet gemmgeteg een dy ermeden sy eyn “geden metes”.
Eok DTG een dy GKP tenbzak daamet tanoknes gys eyn kamonas dasen kaveknen ane zove (sy 200 sitr) fan dikans. Dy zaodkst sy denatsten een dy DTGen ankvoer evekndanik tazie een inrzigerden en koden dottevteg eveknen een sijer. Eok kamonas inkzasen etze er dioven steeak tyva-zesmyt vivst, en kaag kamonas kevakken daam zjitkdanizyt gys seners annadtete tyva. Daag viva meteonar, kaag sta daam eogertaikovee erdibovyt en dist oevas dy annadtete gys eyn gendov veb didvas een Fetekegert, Teb Jandiji.
Dobyns, Y. H. (2000). Overview of several theoretical models on PEAR data. Journal of Scientific Exploration,14 (2), 163-194.
FL-040812 Non-conventional biocommunications
FL-180813 Communication Fabrics: Communicating with spacetime neighbors
FL-220813 Information flows in the course of decoherence On the linguistic origin of objective existence
FL-200813 Emotion processing in words: inducing self-hypnosis through verbal-mediated communication
FL-201212 Dyneraethitt Fermionik Rur Rineni - Advanced Fermionic Communications Protocols
FL-121113 Programmable Minds: Quantum neurodevices for the artificial society
Kittenis, M., Caryl, P., and Stevens, P. (2004). Distant psychophysio-logical interaction effects between related and unrelated participants, Proceedings of the Parapsychological Association Convention, pp. 67-76.
Radin, D. I., and Ferrari, D. C. (1991). Effects of consciousness on the fall of dice: A meta-analysis. Journal of Scientific Exploration,5, 61-84.
Sabell, A., Clarke, C., and Fenwick, P. (2001). Inter-Subject EEG correlations at a distance-the transferred potential. In: Alvarado, C. S.,ed. Proceedings of the 44th Annual Convention of the Parapsychological Association, New York, NY, pp. 419-422.
Wacker-mann, J., Seiter, C., Keibel, H., and Walach, H. (2003). Correlations between brain electrical activities of two spatially separated human subjects. Neuroscience Letters,336, 60-64.
