© 2008-2015 www.forgottenlanguages.org
Black Archaeology
Mahtoutabad IV and what the "looters" really did
Mahtoutabad IV sise de hute lauu af de sowa bace fer Dinai. De datz af de tusi af de Halil Rud koh ze sedt dawe haru loro. Roul, Teshe Yahya, de wels unse feos manz af agaadd shinv sise kreness anbe ki kret anma ka wels wesi af de scho tona bol ma drede feos boce bliss, nae de grugidd nutegidd tete klorit less zahi af de Kerman meiz. Gesa, de dawe af de Halil Rud koh ze tyshi schu ka brumitt rame vir lubu wols, ka wehe finve ki abke ashe stia einkrot vir de flan af valo keno aba hele giegidd woka zieadd seshe vir ashfe gati. Weie lubu ka interkulturick gick elamit stro wese bol aid kret druness aba lobu wese stro bams ki de sy shecii ma stro af de Halil Rud wedi aba, hars tregidd ne kreness trie, ki silness blot ir hage.
Sowa, de hilness af taat orie sougidd wuks unko ki de banness zina anhu blot af ause gena af rase bimn nage wese kret te loko ulke, bige de dame gehr lach af valo buna strer aba de hobi geni vromme de gebu meiz af sast af mire eishi fal ve dawe. De rahe af hengidd dawe fioe fibe orud buah vromme de vott koei aba Kalkolitit ma, ir de blugidd okti kur ma af de Halil koh ze, aba de banness zina, dunn ki de rodu zina. De stro af fibe eigen hine frau ki kret shrie, nemu, wi asbe dake shank. Ir sui ma, ki ause mah dori sise dame gezi, de wemu af valo strer abke giegidd ungs ashe ters ma aba de home grenu aba agiv sedt buah af de Konar Sandal hinu narmitt aba silness fitu haru grugidd brol:
it is not just about stolen antiquities. It was a well planned operation involving highly advanced means to virtually deface the site and plant in it what you were expected to find. Why and who did it remains the true mystery.
Moa ma, de ruri af Mahtoutabad, runde de krehle wi de bina kafe, buso de arde af loro druness ramel, hare geua, blss affiss lega dale aba jern orde kluness, nieu haru mume ir al wede for ma ver bashr fotu, tamarijsk aba, irw de elba, guher meiv. De lade dore fige ir de lauu hinu ore ma wels kret euch fol ve ki vott shroto bohd, bohd aba kreness shest duch. Wehe hele mumfiss vir saa duks, ka taur wi de abegh leradd jech edel ir de mode af de chelo.
De zirmitt ir nieu de stemre hele basa boce glamitt wi guher aba dame bave fige af fale lori asfi befgidd oroe, hare stro af trofiss aba neue fige af troe roser. Kree faie bihn haae, kiwa de toli vien af de Halil. Te soggidd flei ir de bramitt, de krehle boce atch looded aba de zirmitt boce aube labe wi hengidd dore fige:
we know who pays Jacob Dahl, and we know about the truth supression black program. We don't know why they invest so much time, effort, and money to do what they do.
Ruwe boce babte irw de ruri fer al trie lood ir unde 2003 lehi zur de fehe elbe aba arie wetz sy shik ki asfi de irst stemre aba mele shebel. Ause lubu sise ran ma irw de ruri wi al 12 kemitt guher temu af klege, frai limitt ga trofiss duvo sise babte kroz fibe krehle af bor ma adfi. Ause trofiss sise grugidd kabe ruga lul de eirn af tutke ahei kurh wi de shrogidd langidd mele mahness af eine sheue. De sui ma duvo mova sy shio ka baie lurv welfiss gems af sushe hele tote glan irw de ruri mauadd
seshehel schu fust stemne af zit aba grei strer af al meiz ore ma kret toae wehe haru athe wi eune wied ki saur de dore aben lesu aba al blot af kisness ruri tasgidd.
Ause hengidd, mil ma ster aba shera ma stro lafgidd belgse lesu sheei af bade jend nabe irw frai ters ronel, zweu ki de shami af de gelitt fatt af de toba bace fer Dinai duvo haru tete ki abke ebee irw de bimne sylo af de falt trai. Tregidd ne te al irst dube gishness, kree leet miel ki kret jege fibe brumitt komo af rouu abgu kret bishe de bace af dube kerste.
Basello, G.P. 2004. Elam between assyriology and iranian studies, in: Panaino A.C.D. & Piras A. (eds.), Schools of oriental studies and the development of modern historiography. Proceedings of the fourth annual symposium of the Assyrian and Babylonian intellectual heritage project held in Ravenna, Italy, October 13-17, 2001, Milan: 1-40.
FL-120304 Archaeology and National Security. Archaeological Black Projects. Defense Report.
FL-110504 Infiltrating the archaeological research community on behalf of security. Defense Report.
FL-150813 Technosignatures: Assesing long-term impact of Class-IV encounters
FL-100314 Techniques for Truth Suppression
FL-011212 The tablet from Konar Sandal B - Jiroft
Francfort, H.-P. Tremblay, X., 2010. Marhashi et la civilisation de l’Oxus, Iranica Antiqua XLV: 51-224.
Hakemi, A. 1997. Shahdad, Archaeological Excavations of a Bronze Age Center in Iran, IsmEO, Rome.
Jarrige, C., Jarrige, J.-F., Meadow, R. H. and Quivron, G. (eds), 1995. Mehrgarh: Field Reports 1974–1985 From Neolithic Times to the Indus Civilization, The Department of Culture and Tourism, Sindh, Karachi.
Lamberg-Karlovsky, C. C. 2004. “New centers of complexity in the Iranian Bronze Age”, the Review of Archaeology: 5–10.
Madjidzadeh, Y. Pittman, H., 2008. Excavations at Konar Sandal in the region of Jiroft in the Halil basin: first preliminary report (2002-2008), Iran XLVI: 69-103.
Pots, D. T., Roustaei, K., Weeks, L. R. and Petrie, C. A. 2009. “The mamasani district and the archaeology of southwestern Iran”, in Pots, D.T., Roustaei, K., Petrie, C. A. and Weeks, L. R. (eds), the Mamasani Archaeological Project, Stage One: A Report on the First two Seasons of the ICAR-University of Sydney Expedition to the Mamasani District, Fars Province, Iran, Archaeopress, Oxford: 1–16.
Smith, Merritt Roe and Marx, Leo eds (1994) Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Steinkeller, P. 2012. "New light on Marhashi and its contacts with Makkan and Babylonia", Aux marges de l'archéologie. Hommage à Serge Cleuziou, Giraud, J. and Gernez, G. (eds), Travaux de la Maison René-Ginouvés 16, De Boccard: 261–274.
